Will Contests Flashcards

1
Q

In general, grounds for a will to be denied admission to probate are:

A
  1. Defective execution;
  2. Lack of testamentary capacity;
  3. Undue influence;
  4. Fraud; or
  5. Mistake.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A person has standing to contest a will if they have…

A

a pecuniary interest that will be impaired by the will’s admission to probate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The burden of proving capacity is on the…

A

will proponent (the one offering the will to probate).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Proof that a will was validly executed raises a…

A

presumption of capacity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Once the presumption of capacity exists, the will contestant…

A

has the burden of going forward with evidence to overcome it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

To establish undue influence, the contestants must prove:

A
  1. The existence and exertion of influence;
  2. that overpowered the testator’s mind and fee will; and
  3. that produced a will (or gift in a will) that would not have been made but for such influence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A presumption of undue influence arises if it is proved:

A

by clear and convincing evidence that the testator:

  1. suffered from weakness of mind;
  2. named a beneficiary with whom the testator had a relationship of confidence or dependence; and
  3. previously had expressed a contrary intention or no intention regarding the disposition of their will.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Even if there is no presumption of undue influence, a presumption of fraud arises if…

A

the will was drafted by a person in a confidential relationship with the testator, and there are suspicious circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The elements of fraud are:

A
  1. Material misrepresentations by the speaker;
  2. Made with the intent to deceive;
  3. The other party’s ignorance of the falsity; and
  4. Reliance on the misrepresentations that induced the party to act to their injury.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If execution of a will is the result of fraud…

A

the will is invalid.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A court may reform a will or codicil to conform to the decedent’s intention if it is proved by clear and convincing evidence that…

A

both the decedent’s intent and the will’s terms were affected by a mistake of fact or law, whether in expression or in inducement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

(TRUE/FALSE): Extrinsic evidence is admissible to show that the testator was unaware of the nature of the instrument they signed.

A

TRUE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Traditionally, no relief would be granted if the mistake involves the reasons a testator made their will in a particular way and the mistake was not fraudulently induced, however, in Virginia

A

the will can be reformed if it is proven that the will or its terms were induced by mistake.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ambiguity in a will is found when terms are…

A

reasonably susceptible to alternate meanings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A _____ ambiguity exists when the will’s language is clear on its face in describing a beneficiary or property, but results in a misconstruction when applied.

A

latent

[e.g., I give my watch to my brother, Sara].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A _____ ambiguity exists when the uncertainty appears on the face of the will.

A

patent

[e.g., I leave 25,00 to Bob].

17
Q

What type of evidence is admissible to cure a latent ambiguity?

A

Both facts and circumstances, along with the testator’s declarations of intent.

18
Q

What type of evidence is admissible to cure a patent ambiguity?

A

Facts and circumstances, but typically not the testator’s declarations.

19
Q

When will a testator’s declarations be admissible to cure a patent ambiguity?

A

ONLY if there is an equivocation.

[where words describe two or more persons or things equally well]

20
Q

A ______ clause provides that any person who contests a will forfeits their interests under the will.

A

no-contest

21
Q

Does a request for interpretation of an ambiguous term in a will constitute a challenge of the will for purposes of a no-contest clause?

A

No.