Whole thing Flashcards

1
Q

What is the difference between anarchy and chaos?

A

Anarchy is organized chaos, chaos means complete disorder with no organization or structure at all

Anarchy can exist without chaos, while chaos is inherently disordered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does Fearon (1995) define anarchy?

A

Anarchy is the absence of a central authority capable of enforcing agreements or preventing the use of force between states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why can’t anarchy explain warfare?

A

According to Fearon (1995), anarchy alone cannot fully explain warfare because to fails to address why rational actors would choose costly and risky wars when there are typically negotiated settlements that both sides would prefer to fighting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why may anarchy be a necessary condition for war, but not a sufficient condition?

A

Fearon argues that anarchy is a necessary condition of war, but other conditions are necessary for war or conflict to erupt.

Anarchy creates an environment where conflict can occur, but it is not sufficient in itself for conflict to arise. These conditions are: commitment problems, private information and indivisibility are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does Fearon mean with private information ?

A

War can result from states withholding or misrepresenting key information about their capabilities or resolve to gain better bargaining positions, leading to miscalculation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does Fearon mean with commitment problems ?

A

War may occur if states cannot credibly commit to respecting agreements, particularly in situations of shifting power. Anarchy only exacerbates this issue; it doesn’t directly cause it.

There’s no governing body to oversee countries holding true to their commitments. States are therefore hesitant and reluctant to commit to an agreement (or in essence, peace)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is preemptive war?

A

This type of war occurs when a state believes that an attack by an adversary is imminent and strikes first to gain an advantage. The logic is to disrupt or neutralize the adversary’s ability to launch their intended strike. It is often tied to the concept of a “first strike advantage”, where acting primitive provides a better strategic position or mitigates the anticipated damage from the opponent’s initial attack (Fearon 1995)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is preventive war?

A

Preventive war arises from a state’s perception that its relative power will decline in the future due to the adversary’s growing power. The state then chooses to attack before the adversary becomes too strong or influential. Preventive wars are based on long-term calculations and are linked to commitment problems.

Ex: a declining state fears that a rising power won’t honor agreements when it becomes dominant in the future, leading to the declining state to take action whilst it still holds the advantage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Are intangible incentives rational?

A

Blattman (2022) acknowledges that intangible incentives are rational from the perspective of the actors who hold them, but they often lead to outcomes that are suboptimal or destructive.

He highlights that these incentives shrink the bargaining range because they make compromise seem like betrayal or failure. However, this doesn’t mean the motivations themselves are irrational; rather, they are a reflection of deeply held values and beliefs​.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are Blattman’s five reasons for why we fight?

A
  1. Intangible incentives (direct and indirect utility)
  2. Uncertainty
  3. misperception
  4. commtiment problem
  5. unchecked interests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are specialists in violence?

A

As agrarian societies spread and developed, a surplus of food led to a bigger population. The traditional societal structure of “everyone does everything” was not longer efficient, and the need for sociatel structure and organization emerged. The surplus of food needed to be proteced from bandits, and thus the specialists in violence came to be.

Violence was used to protect food surplus, territory and external threats in general

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are illiberal democracies?

A

Zakaria (1997) defined illiberl democracies without constitutional liberalism. Constitutional liberalism refers to the upholding of rule of law, freedom of speech, religion and assembly.

Illiberal democracies are often characterized by limited freedom of speech, as a means to consolidate power for the government and elite. Illiberal democracies prioritize majority rule, and ethnic groups or other marginalized societies are often repressed - which causes grievances and incentives for discontent amongst the population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are roving bandits?

A

Groups or individuals that pilage and plunder resources in a region without establishing and long-term governance or stability. They prioritize immediate gain, and extract wealth without precaution to long term economic gain in the society.

They do not impose any sense of roder in the area, and their presence is chaos and can dismantel the incentives to invest in the area.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does populism do to democratic norms?

A

Zakaria (1997) wanrs that unckecked populism in democracies can erode democratic norms and lead to illiberal democracies, undermining institutional safeguards.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Misperceptions is considered to stem from irrationality, how so?

A

Mispercpetions is rooted in irrationality because it comes from emotional decisions, biased beliefs, cognitive biases, rather than from a rational analysis of information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Uncertainty is considered rational, how so?

A

Uncertanty is rational becuase the decisions derive drom a rationa analysis of infromation. The problem is incomplete information/private infromation, leading to miscalcualtions and over and underestimating oneself or the enermy

17
Q

What are horizontal inequalities (HIs)?

A

Inequalities in economic, political, or social dimensions or cultural status between culturally defined groups (Stewart 2008)

Macro analysis

18
Q

What is vertical inequaility?

A

Vertical inequality refers to disparities among individuals, usually measured by metrics like income or wealth distribution.

Micro analysis

19
Q

How is HI manifested?

A

HIs manifests disparities in access to resources, public servies political representation and opportunities across identity groups.

This can take the form of a specific ethnic group in a state being systematically excluded from healthcare, education for the children, and not being representated in government. This was well documented in the Nepalese Maoist insurgency.

20
Q

Why isn’t vertical inequality associated with armed conflict?

A

Vertical inequality lacks this collective dimension and often does not lead to organized conflict unless combined with group-based disparities.

21
Q

According to Cederman et al., which inequalities are statistically linked to higher risks of civil war?

A

Economic and poltical had the strongest statistical associations.

22
Q

Is conscription a form of forced recruitment?

A

Conscription by state militaries involves compelling individuals to join the armed forces, often under legal mandates. While it is insitutionalixed and very much legal, it shares elements of coercion seen in rebel recruitment

23
Q

Under which conditions are civil movements likely to fail?

A

Chenoweth and Stephan outlined several condition under which civil movements are likely to fail:

  • Divided leadership
  • Not staying non-violent
  • Mobilizing in low populations areas
  • Protesting in economically insignificant areas

Other include:
* lack of international support
* failure to adapt to new tactics
* repressive countermeasures from government

24
Q

What are the three types of military intervention according to Blattman?

A
  1. Balance of power
  2. Asummetry
  3. Pronderant
25
Q

Explain balance of power in terms of third-party military intervention:

A

Balancing interventions are third-party interventions that aim at creating parity between parties to encourage negotiations - essentially make them more equal so there is more incentive to bargin.

High probability of bargining an outcome, but the conflict might be prolonged

Usually successful

26
Q

Explain predonderant interventions :

A

Type of intervention where the intervention is so forceful that the fight is basically over. It quickly bring conflict to a halt - but according to Blattman it can lead to resentment or a percpetion of illegitimacy.

27
Q

Explain asymmetric intervention :

A

An external actor supports one side of a conflict, creating an imbalance in power between the parties.

28
Q

What is the conflict trap (Fukuyama, 2011)?

A

Fukuyama argues that without the three pillars of political order and stability - we have political decay –> leading to disorder –> leading to more conflict –> leading to more decay

29
Q

What defines state fragility?

A

Economic collapse
Environmental degradation
Widespread corruption
Political crisis and instability
Armed conflict
Escalation of private and social violence

30
Q
A