Who innovates, and why? Flashcards
Determinants of innovative activity
Economists interpretation: costs and benefits of innovation are dominant drivers of innovative activity
- whoever stands to gain most innovation will be most likely to perform it
- whoever has the lowest cost of doing an innovation will be most likely to do it
Schumpeter classical question: what market structure is most conducive to innocation
Schumpter I:
- entrepreneurs and new firms drive innovation (fragmented markets)
II:
- large firms drive innovation
-> markets with some monopoly power
Arrows model
- ex-ante perfect competition -> ex-post monopoly
- ex-ante monopoly -> ex-post monopoly
- lowest inventive (cannibalization effect) - ex-ante social planer -> ex-ante social planer
efficieny effect
if the innovation is only slightly better than existing products it is more attractive to remain the only player in a monopolistic market than to become the second player in duopoly
Liabilities of newness
lead to increased failure rates vs. older firms
roles and tasks have to be
assigned (takes time, creates
inefficiencies and conflicts)
– new organizations lack reputation
and experience
– exchange relationships with
various actors have to be
established
– new firms have to rely on
interactions among “strangers”
advantages of new firms
Organization-related advantages:
– no path-dependence; can create
business from scratch, thus more
willing to pursue completely new
approaches
– less “inertia“; company structure
more flexible
– more open and flexible culture
▪ HR-related advantages:
– can hire people that exactly match
the task at hand; no need for retraining
– will have, on average, more
flexible employees (younger,
more entrepreneurial)
Liabilities of smallness
lead to larger failure rates
limited resources (financial,
personnel, …)
▪ low variety of skills in the firm;
some critical skills may be lacking
▪ no buffer to survive times of crisis
▪ disadvantage on the job market
(as an employer)
▪ low market power
▪ little “organizational slack”
available for innovation, training
etc.
advantages of smallness
more flexible processes
▪ company structure easier to
identify, clearly laid out
▪ short ways, direct communication
▪ fast decision-making
▪ job satisfaction typically higher
Disruptive innovation model
Christensen characteristics of these innovations:
– These innovations are technologically straightforward
– Initially, they do not satisfy customers in established markets
instead, they are sold to niche or new markets
– Over time, however, performance of both established and new
technology grow faster than market needs
– Eventually, the new technology supplants the old one even in the
established, main market