Weeks 9-11 Flashcards
T/F damage is RH is often overlooked with respect to language and communicative competence
True
Symptoms tend to be more subtle with respect to communication
Mess obvious stroke symptoms → physicians (and families) are less likely to refer to SLP for cognitive-communication impairments
Extralinguistic impairments
Occurs with RH syndrome
Impairments in:
Pragmatics
Conversation cohesion
Linking sentences
Integrating verbal with nonverbal info
Understanding main idea
Standard aphasia batteries for linguistics won’t detect RH extralinguistic impairments
Linguistic impairments
Occurs with LH damage
Impairments in language structure
Why is RH syndrome difficult to study or underdiagnosed
No specific “communication areas” → Might be large networks involved in RH communicative functions
No clear patterns for categorization
Pragmatic and cognitive competence on spectrum
Normal declines in communication with aging
RH damage %
~50% with RHD have impaired verbal communication
~80% with RHD in rehab units have cognitive and/or communication impairments
Types of cognitive impairments with RHD
Attention
Visuospatial perception
Learning
Memory
SLPs look at cognition/attention to help figure out comprehension breakdown
T/F - RHD will affect pragmatic competence and discourse level communication MORE THAN word- and sentence- level processes
TRUE
Types of communication impairments with RHD
figurative/nonliteral language
Inference
discourse/pragmatics
RHD is often diagnosed as…
cognitive -communicative disorder/impairment
Or
Cognitive-linguistic impairment/disorder
T/F
RHD can respond appropriately to indiect questions in naturalistic contexts
TRUE
T/F
RHD can directly and indirectly make requests, but often do not justify or provide explanation for request
TRUE
T/F
Fewer formulaic expression produced following RHD when compared with individual with LHD
TRUE
How does RHD have difficulty with inferencing
When situation requires elaborative inferences
When situation has multiple potential interpretations
Difficulty with understanding nad interpreting humor, sarcasm, and emotions when different from their own emotion
Suppression-deficit hypothesis
What is suppression-deficit hypothesis
With RHD, can generate several interpretations, but reduced ability to suppress/inhibit less-likely interapations
E.g. cookie theft picture description task - may talk about the bushes rather than the action of the picture
What are the discourse-level impairments in RHD
name 7
Egocentric
tangential/off-topic/irrelevant content
Difficulty maintaining conversation and linking utternances to overall topic
Disorganized narratives
Theory of mind breakdown: Reduced ability to ID/repair conversation breakdowns
Reduced ability to judge appropriateness of conversation
confabulations : when people say something untrue but not aware it’s untrue
How to assess RHD
Informally test because most RHD tests are not sensitive enough to detect subtle changes in higher-level discourse
Informal test include: narrative, biography, conversation, story-retell, picture description —> responses will be “off” or irrelevant
Many RHD impairments are due to inability
False
Most impairments are due to inefficient processing NOT inability
Do well with straightforward tasks → taxiing system reveals inefficient processing
RHD treatment
Understudied
Target metaphor comprehension → emphasizing use of context
Use contextual clues to facilitate comprehension
Patient uses self-cueing (internal) rather than clinician-cueing (external)
What is aprosodia
RH injury; not aware of it
Difficulty in comprehension or use of prosody to signal linguistic boundaries, meaning of convey emotion
Treatment for aprosodia
Focus on use of prosody to express emotion
Motoric aspects of prosody
Both found to be successful with generalization
Left neglect vs left visual cut
Left neglect → doesn’t’ recognize left side needs attention
Left visual cut → Visual field is cut
How does RHD affect attention
Attention: ability to focus on a stimulus and filter our other stimuli
Inability to focus on one thing
Reduced sustained attention and topic maintenance
Reduced alternating attention
Reduced divided attention b/e multiple tasks
Reduced selective attention
How does reduced selective attention affect communication
Irrelevant content
Inability to shift topics appropriately
May also perseverate on one topic
RHD: Nonlinguistic impairments: neglect
Failure to report, respond, orient, attend to stimuli on the left side of body despite within functional limit of motor/sensory function
Occurs in 80% of RHD patients
Attentional impairment → attention is on right side only
Assessments for neglect
scanning /canceling tasks → line bisetion task
Drawing → draw a clock at 10 o’clock
reading/writing
Types of neglect
Personal Peripersonal Extrapersonal Viewer-centered object-centered
Personal → neglects the left half of body → not shaving left side of face
Peripersonal → neglects half of space within arm’s length such as not eating food on left side of plate or not finding remote on left side of bed
Extrapersonal → neglect half of space beyond arm’s reach, not noticing a window or tv or visitor
Viewer-centered: neglects left side of space defined by patient’s midline; left side will move as patient turns head
Object-centered: neglects left side of an object, regardless of where it is placed; neglecting left side of photo even if the entire photo is place in right visual field
Treatments for neglect
Scanning tasks have limited generalization
External stimulation→ left-neck vibrations → reduced severity several days post tx
Presenting stimuli spanning the midline
Voluntary movement of attention by having patient ID items on left and right sides of pages
Training patient to activity manipulate object in space
RHD impairments in higher-level processing
50% of RHD patient in rehab
Effects on communication like:
organizing/sequencing,
reasoning (implied meaning and theory of mind),
problem solving (reduced ability to repair conversation)
RHD treatment for cognitive deficits
No specific protocol but can use other strategies like treatment for RH TBI
Compensatory strategies are too specific and RHD may have difficulty with abstract thinking, reason so don’t know when to use strategy appropriately
More beneficial to train habitual use (using it all of the time) of strategy to facilitate overcoming deficits
What is anosognosia
Lack of awareness of deficits or reduced awareness of deficits
Co-occurs with neglect
May need increase of supervision
Diagnosis criteria for major neurocognitive disorder (dementia)
Significant cognitive decline
Substantial impairment in cognitive performance
Cognitive deficits interfere with independence in everyday activities
Must specify: with or without behavioral disturbance
Diagnosis criteria for mild neurocognitive disorder (dementia)
modest cognitive decline
modest impairment in cognitive performance
Cognitive deficits do not interfere with independence in everyday activities
Must specify: with or without behavioral disturbance