Week3 Flashcards

1
Q

Outcomes of this are conceptual models and propositions. It uses research strategies such as case studies, interviews, etc as data analysis method. + subjective

A

Qualitative research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The results are usually hypothesis tests and optimal choices. It utilises research strategies such as surveys, experiments and mathematical modelling. + objective

A

Quantitative research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Advantages of combining research strategies

A

enrich interpretation
Better methodological quality (triangulation)
better generalizability and conving results of the research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

case study

A

A case study is a research strategy that involves an in-depth investigation of a specific phenomenon, event, organization, or individual within a real-world context. It is commonly used in qualitative research, though it can include quantitative elements.

not suited for decision science

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Advantages and disadvantages of case studies

A

Advantages of Case Studies
✔ Provides deep insights into a specific problem
✔ Helps generate new theories (inductive approach)
✔ Can combine qualitative & quantitative data
✔ Useful for real-world business problems

Disadvantages of Case Studies
✘ Findings may not be generalizable to all situations
✘ Can be time-consuming and require large amounts of data
✘ Risk of researcher bias due to deep involvement in the case

Case studies are appropriate for many research objectives: what, how, why, etc. But nog for: how many, how often. -> harder to quantify the relationship between variables using case studies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

2 types of case studies

A

single and comparative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Difference between cross-sectional and longitudinal case studies.

A

A cross-sectional case study examines a phenomenon at a single point in time or within a short time frame. It provides a snapshot of a situation but does not track changes over time.

A longitudinal case study examines changes in a phenomenon over time, often spanning months or years. It tracks trends, developments, and cause-effect relationships.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does it mean when a study has an embedded design?

A

The study then has multiple levels of analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Difference between unit of analysis and level of analysis

A

The unit of analysis refers to the primary entity being studied or observed in the research. It defines what or who is being analyzed to answer the research question.

The level of analysis refers to the perspective or scale at which the data is interpreted. It defines how findings are generalized and at what level patterns are observed.

If you analyze individual employee responses, your level of analysis is micro.

If you compare departments or teams, your level of analysis is meso.

If you compare industries or generations, your level of analysis is macro.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Common data sources in case studies

A

Interviews
Documentation
Observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Data triangulation

A

Combining two ore more sources of data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How to get convincing results in case studies?

A

Use more than one source of data.
belangrijk begrip: Informant triangulation -> ask similar questions to multiple respondents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Three types of interviews

A

structured, semi-structured and unstructured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Questions that lead the interviewee to the answer that you are expecting.

A

Leading question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Thematic analysis

A

Thematic Analysis is a qualitative data analysis method used to identify, analyze, and interpret patterns (themes) within textual data. It is commonly used in research that involves interviews, open-ended survey responses, documents, or other qualitative data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Coding (qualitative data)
3 types of coding

A

Critical process in making sense of qualitative data.

First-level codes -> The initial stage where researchers assign labels (codes) to raw data.
These codes are descriptive and close to the original text (surface-level meaning).
Focuses on identifying recurring words, phrases, or ideas in the data.

Second-level codes -> The process of grouping first-level codes into broader categories (themes).
Looks for relationships between codes to form meaningful patterns.
Helps in categorizing similar ideas under overarching themes.

Third-level codes -> The highest level of coding, where broader themes and theories emerge.
Themes are linked to theoretical concepts and the research question.
Used to build narratives or frameworks based on findings.

17
Q

Synonyms for first, second and third level codes (respectively)

A

Open, axial, selective coding

18
Q

Validity

A

Instrument measures what it is intended to measure

19
Q

Reliability

A

Findings will be the same if the research is replicated

20
Q

3 types of validity

A

Construct validity:Ensures that your survey, test, or experiment accurately measures the concepts it is supposed to.

Internal validity: Ensures that X causes Y and not due to other factors.
External validity: Ensures that findings apply beyond the study sample (to other people, settings, or time periods).

21
Q

3 general threats to validity in qualitative research

A

Informant bias (the one that is being questioned): topic is too personal or sensitive. personal connection or event discussed happende a while ago.

Researcher bias: researcher has personal connection or lacks the necessary research skill.

Idiosyncratic bias: cases of informants are unique, making it difficult to generalise.