week 9 - measuring outcomes of brand equity Flashcards

1
Q

what is quantitive research deisgn: survey

A

Survey is structured data collection from a sample of a target population to provide facts and estimates relating to customers, offerings, competitors, environmental factors or other phenomena:
to make accurate predictions about relationships between market factors and customer behaviours & characteristics
Understand the relationships and differences
validate existing relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

if data in survey is collected at a single point in time

A

cross sectional study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

if data from server is collected repeatedly through time

A

longgitudinal study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the multidimensionality of brand equity and the importance of multiple methods to measure it.

A
brand awarness e.g. 
brand peformance
brand imagery
brand judgements
brand feelings
brand peformance - loyalty to a certain brand, wom liklihood to recomend

stonrgly agree, agree etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

measures of marekting peformance - brand peformance

A

market share
brand extension sucess
brand sales revenue per unit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

measures of marketing peformance - customer oriented

A

customer loyalty
customer retention
share of wallet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

measures of marketing - financial measures

A
gross profit
net profit margin
return on assets
customer life-time value
customer equity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

define comparative methods

A

use expirements that examnie consumer attitudes toward a brand, to more directly assess the benefits arising from having a high level of awarness and strong, favourable and unique brand associations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

3 types of comparative methods

A

brand based comparative approach
marketing based comparative approaches
conjoint analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

define brand based comparative approach

A

expierements in which one group of consumer reposnts to an elements of the marketing program when it is attributed to the brand and another group responds to that same element when it is attributed to a competitive or fictiously named brand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define marekting based comparative approach

A

expirements in which consumers respond to changes in elemnts of the marekting program for the brand or competitive brand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

define conjoint analysis

A

survey based multivariate technique that enables marketers to profile the consumer buying deicion process with respect to products and brands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain brand based comparative approaches

A

Competitive brands used as benchmarks by consumers
Exemplar: Category leader or some other brand that consumers feel is representative of the category, like their most preferred brand
Consumption research for new or existing products
Useful to determine brand equity benefits related to price margins and premiums

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

advantages + disadvantages of brand based comparative approaches

A

Advantages
Isolates the value of a brand in a very real sense
Applicable when the marketing activity under consideration represents a change from past marketing of the brand
Achievement of realism

Disadvantage
Simulations and concept statements may distort the results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain marketing based comparative approaches

A

Hold the brand fixed and examine consumer response based on changes in the marketing program
Assessing consumer response to different advertising strategies.
Explore potential brand extensions by collecting consumer evaluations of a range of concept statements.

Advantage
Ease of implementation

Disadvantage
Difficult to discern whether consumer responses are caused by brand knowledge or by more generic product knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

advantage and disadvantage of marketing based comparative approaches

A

Advantage
Ease of implementation

Disadvantage
Difficult to discern whether consumer responses are caused by brand knowledge or by more generic product knowledge

17
Q

explain conjoint analysis

A

Used to estimate the relative importance consumers attach to salient attributes, and the utilities they attach to the levels of attributes
The underlying assumption is that brands are evaluated by consumers as a bundle of attributes
Derived from consumers’ evaluation of product profiles composed of attributes and their levels
Consumers are presented with product profiles with different combinations of attribute levels
Consumers evaluate each product profile in terms of its desirability
For each respondent, conjoint procedures assign utility values to each attribute level
Allows identification of the most preferred combination of features

18
Q

Application of conjoint analysis

A

Brand image analysis:
The relative contribution of each product attribute can be determined for use in marketing and advertising decisions

Segmentation analysis:
Groups of potential customers who place different levels of importance on the product features can be identified for use as high and low potential market segments

19
Q

benefits of conjoint analysis

A

Study different brands and different aspects of the product or marketing program simultaneously.

Ability to provide utility estimates for individual levels of each product attribute

Ability to estimate non-linear relationships among attribute levels

Outcome allows to communicate the most preferred combination of features

20
Q

limitations of conjoint analysis

A

Marketing profiles may violate consumers’ expectations
Difficult to specify and interpret brand attribute levels
Consumers may have difficulty making choices or indicating preferences among large numbers of profiles