Week 9 Flashcards
Extent of substantive procedures:
Determined by risk assessment.
Trivial or immaterial accounts are either ignored or subjected to analytical procedures only.
Audit risk model used to make a risk assessment on each significant account or disclosure.
High IR, CR: do not rely on and test controls, use significant amount of substantive testing to reduce DR to acceptable level.
Low IR, CR: testing controls shows them to be effective, limited substantive testing required.
Timing of substantive procedures:
Also determined by risk assessment.
Lower DR, more work done at year-end.
Audit firm must also consider availability of resources to conduct procedures around year-end.
Use techniques to influence schedule:
review events prior to year-end
e.g. acquisitions.
Review activity in period to date, e.g. review interim ageing of debtors then update at year-end.
Perform general audit procedures prior to year-end, e.g. read board minutes.
Review provisions prior to year-end, e.g. understand estimation processes used by management.
Leverage off internal audit (ASA 610; ISA 610).
Matters to consider when designing substantive procedures:
Ensure procedures respond to specific risk faced by client from both IR and CR factors.
Different clients may have same overall level of risk but risk caused by different factors.
Procedures would be also different.
Take credit for work already done – early work in audit to assess risk also provides evidence.
Set appropriate testing thresholds – what the auditor considers important for an audit will vary depending on the overall risk assessment.
Substantive testing of cash
Three most important assertions:
Existence:
usually addressed by bank confirmation (AGS 1002).
Completeness:
test bank reconciliation and cut-off of cash transactions
verify reconciling items to next period bank statement.
Classification:
important because of special disclosure requirements.
Substantive testing of cash
Other assertions may also be important:
Rights and obligations:
assertion also significant where clients may pledge assets
pledging restricts client’s rights over cash.
Valuation and allocation:
usually only an issue when client has significant foreign currency bank accounts.
Objectives in auditing cash
slide 15
Process affecting cash:
Auditor assesses evidence obtained from interim testing on significant transactions, control testing.
When CR low, unlikely to do additional testing on cash receipts and payments, focus on balance.
If CR not low, substantive tests of receipts and payments may be required.
Example substantive tests of transactions — cash:
slide 17 18 20
Illustrative procedures for auditing cash:
Testing cash account balances always done at some level, additional procedures required as risk assessment increases.
Tests include bank confirmations, bank reconciliation re-performance, analytical procedures etc.
Substantive testing of trade receivables
Important assertions:
Existence:
Usually addressed by debtors’ confirmation (ASA 505; ISA 505).
Positive confirmation:
auditor requests reply in all circumstances.
Negative confirmation:
auditor requests reply only if debtor disagrees with balance shown.
Usually addressed by debtors’ confirmation (ASA 505; ISA 505).
Confirmations do not provide assurance about valuation because they do not address recoverability.
Valuation and allocation:
Use subsequent receipts test.
Analytical procedures based on ageing.
Other assertions may also be important in the audit of trade receivables.
Classification:
Assertion can also be important because of disclosures, such as related parties and financial instruments.
Rights and obligations:
Can also be important because of restrictions on trade terms.
Completeness:
Can be addressed through cut-off testing.
Objectives in auditing trade receivables:
26
Processes affecting trade receivables:
There are three important transactions that impact on the balance of trade receivables:
sales
sales Returns and Allowances
cash receipts.
Auditor would only consider these procedures if unable to test and rely on controls or it is deemed more efficient to test balance substantively
Example substantive tests of transactions – trade receivables:
28 29 30
Illustrative procedures for auditing trade receivables
31 32 33
Substantive testing of inventory
Two most important assertions:
Existence
Usually addressed by testing client’s annual or cyclical stock take (ASA 501; ISA 501).
Auditor tests client’s verification of physical inventory with records, and auditor must sight inventory.
Lower CR, less likely stocktake is performed only annually.
Valuation and allocation:
Lower of cost and NRV - AASB 102 (IAS 2).
Sighting inventory at stock take allows auditor to assess slow-moving, damaged, obsolete, impaired, excess stock which should be written down.
Typical techniques:
vouching to invoices to verify initial cost
vouching to sales details to verify cost of sales
test provision for impairment calculations.