Week 8: what is the European Union + Caramani ch. 23 and Lelieveldt & Princen (2015) Chapter 3 Flashcards
Why and how did the states start to cooperate? Which factors drove this? -> two views
Intergovernmental view (Stanley Hoffmann)
Supranational view (Ernst Haas)
Intergovernmental view
- National governments are main actors
- Integration only occurs in accordance with member states’ interests
- European Institutions serve member states’ (collective) interests
- From the intergovernmental view, there is no democratic deficit
- Intergovernmental institutions facilitate bargaining
Supranational view
- Neo-functionalism
- “Spillover” -> the idea that if we integrate one aspect, in order to get this benefit, we have to integrate another aspect (there will always be next steps)
- Common market of coal would work better if there was a common market for all goods
- Political, economic and social forces beyond national governments
- The process will ultimately lead to full political integration
Intergovernmental institutions:
- The European Council
- Council of the EU
The European Council
- Founded in 1974
- Heads of State or Government
- Provide political direction
- Highest-level of decision making
- Treaty revisions
- Appointments
Council of the EU
- National ministers
- Meets in 10 different configurations
- Negotiaties and adopts EU law
- International agreement
- External relations
- Accession -> council has to agree with new members
- Budget
- Rotating presidency
Supranational institutions
- European commission
- European Parliament
European commission
- 26 commissioners + 1 president
- “Shall promote the general interest of the Union”
- Initiates EU legislation
- Manages and implements EU policy
- External representation (trade)
- ‘Guardian of the Treaties’ -> To see that all the states stick to the agreements that they agreed to
European Parliament
- Only directly elected EU institution
- 705 members
- Legislator
- Has to approve budget
- Controls the executive
- Appointments (commission)
Legislating in the EU:
- European Council sets the EU’s policy agenda
- European Commission proposes legislation and budget to
- European Parliament and Council of the EU, who jointly decide legislation and budget
- It’s a very high consensus system.
- Power battles are very high in the EU, lots of veto powers
Is the EU democratic? minimalist view:
- Legislature is elected
Parliament, yes
Council, indirectly - More than one political party, yes
-Alteration of power under same electoral rules has taken place, yes
- Chief executive is elected
Question of interpretation -> indirect elections with parliament and council
Also the question if the council president is powerful enough to be called chief executive.
The EU is some kind of democracy but not fully as we learned in CAPI.
Democratic deficit and the EU
- Missing a ‘European demos’ -> there is not a single european people. Means it can never be a full democracy, because there is no one european people
- EP elections are ‘second order elections’. Less important elections, lower turnout
- Voters preferences not clearly translate into executive power
- No collective accountability for council
For example: German and French ministers in the council, no control over from different members - Weak european parliament: no right to initiate legislature, can only ask the commission
EU, a political system?
Yes, using Eastons model:
- Clearly defined set of institutions
- Citizens seek to achieve their political desires through the system
- Collective decisions have impact on the distribution of resources and allocation of values
- Continuous interaction between political outputs and new demands on the system.
It is however not a state since the EU is based on voluntary cooperation between the member-states, there is no direct taxation, the budget is small and the EU relies on the coercive forces of its member-states.
But, there is a constitutional architecture
Vertical dimension: the EU as a ‘regulatory state’
The dominant policy goal of the EU is the creation and regulation of a market on a continental scale. The EU is often described as a ‘regulatory state’.
- Creation and regulation of the single market: the creation of the single market has both deregulatory and regulatory aspects.
- Deregulatory: fiscal barriers; harmonization of e.g. taxes, physical barriers; removing border controls and customs formalities on the movements of goods and people, technical barriers; to free the movement of goods and services whereby e.g. any product meeting the standards of one member state can be legally sold in another member state.
- Re-regulatory: the EU replaced national policies on different matters. (Competition policies: anti-trust, environmental policy: air and noise polution, social policy: rights of workers to free movement).
Economic and monetary union: economic and monetary union is a complement to the single market, in that a single market functions more effectively with a single currency, and a single currency governed by an independent central bank ensures economic stability.
EU expenditure policies: EU expenditure policies are a secondary policy instrument of the EU, and have mainly been used to enable major steps in the process of economic integration by consensus. Consists of solidarity payments (from richer to poorer states) and side payments (bargaining by member states, compensation for losing a battle)
Interior policies and external relations:
The EU has begun to expand beyond economic policies, into justice and interior affairs policies and foreign and security policies, and security policies, and policy-making in these areas has developed rapidly in recent years.
The basic policy architecture of the EU, where a continental-scale market is created and regulated at the European level while spending and security policies remain largely at the national level, means that the EU is more a ‘regulatory state’ than a welfare state or security state.
Horizontal dimension of the EU
- Multiple actors have the ability to block policy changes, leads to hyper consensus system of government
- Executive politics: competing agenda setters
Agenda-setting power is split between European Council and the Commission
Council decides broad policy directions. The European Commission has the monopoly on the initiative. - Bicameral legislative
Over the years, the EU parliament is growing in strength
Maastricht treaty gave life to the co-decision procedure
Council usually votes by qualified majority (55% of member states, 65% of Eu population). On sensitive issues it requires unanimity. Voting, however rarely takes place, strong incentives for consensus - Judicial politics: a powerful and independent court
ECJ have a powerful role. Supremacy and direct effect of EU law