Week 8 reading 2: Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behaviour: a developmental taxonomy Flashcards
Delinquency conceals 2 distinct categories of individuals
-Life course persistent= small group of individuals engage in antisocial behavior in 1 sort or another at every life stage
-Adolescent limited= larger group of individuals is antisocial only during adolescence
-Two qualitatively different categories requires two distinct theoretical explanations. Antisocial behaviour across time is incredibly stable for some people, and not stable at all for others.
How does life-course persistent antisocial behaviour arise?
-Children’s neuropsychological problems interact cumulatively with their criminogenic environments across development resulting in a pathological personality
-Theory must locate casual factors early in childhood and explain the continuity in their troubled lives.
How does adolescence limited antisocial behaviour arise?
-A contemporary maturity gap encourages teens to mimic antisocial behavior in ways that are normative and adjustive
-Theory must reflect the discontinuity in their lives (have causal factors that are proximal to the issues)
Age and antisocial behaviour
-Rates of crime peak in adolescence (age 17) and then drop in young adulthood
-General pattern remains for both genders and across most types of crime, in numerous western nations
-Previously curve based on arrest statistics. Not necessarily the best indicator of antisocial beahviour. Now, self-report measures included (again not perfect).
Proposed reasons for the age/ antisocial behaviour curve (i.e. what explain the peak in offending?)
-Does a small and constant number of offenders simply generate more criminal acts while they are adolescent?
-Or does adolescence cause an increase in the number of people who are willing to offend
-Evidence suggests the second option (new people not acceleration of pre-existing people).
How do the life-course persistent and adolescence limited individuals differ?
-Etiology (cause)
-Developmental course
-Prognosis
-Classification of their behavior as either pathological or normative
Is adolescence-limited antisocial behavior a normative part of adolescent development?
Yes, the paper argues that adolescence-limited antisocial behavior is a normative part of adolescent development and is not indicative of a deeper antisocial personality.
What negative outcomes are associated with life-course-persistent antisocial behavior?
Range of negative outcomes, including criminal behavior and poor social and economic outcomes.
What are some of the risk factors that contribute to the development of antisocial behavior?
-Individual factors (e.g., low IQ, impulsivity, poor self control)
-Contextual factors (e.g., family dysfunction, exposure to violence).
(influence both types but to varying degrees)
Is life-course-persistent antisocial behavior more strongly influenced by individual or contextual factors?
Life-course-persistent antisocial behavior is more strongly influenced by individual factors than adolescence-limited antisocial behavior.
Dual taxonomy of antisocial behavior
Two underlying dimensions of antisocial behavior:
-a “dimension of severity”
-a “dimension of age of onset.”
Dimension of severity
Extent and severity of the antisocial behavior.
Dimension of age of onset
The timing of the onset of the antisocial behaviour
What are the scores on the dimensions of severity and age of onset for life-course-persistent antisocial behavior?
Individuals who exhibit life-course-persistent antisocial behavior have high scores on both dimensions.
(High score of age corresponds to young age onset)
What are the scores on the dimensions of severity and age of onset for adolescence-limited antisocial behavior?
Those who exhibit adolescence-limited antisocial behavior have high scores on the dimension of severity but low scores on the dimension of age of onset.