Week 8 - Other anomalies, Asset Prices Flashcards

1
Q

Open-ended funds v closed-ended funds

A

Open-ended funds create new share, cost = NAV

Closed-end funds issue fixed number of shares

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How are shares traded

A

on exchanges, buy at the prevailing price from another investor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Closed-end Funds Puzzle

A

puzzle: fund share prices differ NAV - typical fund trades at a discount to NAV of about 10% on average

Difference between price and NAV varies substantially over time

When closed-end funds are created, share price is typically above NAV

When they are terminated, either through liquidation or open-ending, gap between price and NAV closes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rational explanations

A
  • Expenses
  • expectations about future fund manager performance
  • tax liabilities

BUT: none of them can explain all aspects of the evidence - management fees explain why fund usually sell at discounts but not why they sell at a premium or why discounts vary from week to week

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Behavioural explanations

A

Investor sentiment
- individuals who are the primary owners of closed-ended funds are noise traders
- Sometimes they are too optimistic, other times they are too pessimistic
- changes in sentiment affect fund share prices and hence difference between prices and NAV

Owners of closed-end funds have two sources of risk
- fluctuations in value of assets and noise trader sentiments
- rational investors demand compensation for this

This also explains why new closed-end funds are sold at a premium
- entrepreneurs whill choose to create closed-end funds at times of investor exhuberance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Limited Attention 1

A

Because of limited attention, investors may underreact to news

May explain PEAD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How to test Limited attention

A
  1. PEAD is stronger for firms that announce earnings at the same time as many other firms
  2. PEAD stronger for firms that announce earnings on Friday
  3. PEAD stronger for low volume stocks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Underreaction to Customer links

A

firms are required to report their major customers - investors are slow to recognise that good news for a customer is good news for associated firm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Underreaction to Demographic news

A

Investors are slow to recognise impact of demographic shifts on the future profitability of firms with age-sensitive products

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Limited Attention 2

A

Attention more important for individual investor’s buying decisions than for selling decisions

Barber and Odean (2008) - there is stronger buying interest than selling interest for attention grabbing stocks (stocks with extreme returns, high volume or news announcements)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How do prices comove according to traditional view

A
  • Common factor in future cash flows
  • Changes in rf
  • changes in risk aversion
  • common factor in news about risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Example of comovement anomaly 1

A

Twin shares (eg. Royal Dutch and Shell)

  • Shares should move in lock-step, but they dont
  • Royal Dutch shares comove strongly with S&P
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Example of Comovement anomaly 2

A

Closed-end Funds

  • CEFs comove strongly with one another even though their asset fundamentals are weakly related
  • CEFs comove with small stocks even when they hold only large stocks
    -Closed-end country funds comove as strongly with the national market in the country where fund is traded as with the market where the assets are traded
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Frictional explanation for Comovement

A
  • Based on investor Habitats
  • Some investors choose to hold and trade only subset of all securities
  • As risk aversion or sentiment changes, they buy or sell this subset - common factor in returns of securities in this subset
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Behavioural explanation for Comovement

A

Assumptions:
- Investors group stocks into categories (eg. value, growth, small-cap, large-cap, etc.)
- investors’ beliefs about future return on a category is a weighted average of its past returns

Predictions:
- excessive comovement within a category

Applications:
- Comovement of value stocks, small stocks
- Comovement of commodities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Categorical thinking

A

Barberis, Shleifer, Wurgler predict that stocks added to the S&P500 will comove more with the index after addition than before

17
Q

Bubble definition

A

Bubble is an episode in which an asset become significantly overvalued for some period of time

  • price is higher than a reasonable present value of its future cash flows
  • Price is higher than it would be in an economy with fully rational investors
18
Q

Empirically-based definition of bubble

A

Episode in which the price of an asset rises sharply over some period of time and then collapses
- during the price rise, there is much talk of overvaluation in the media and among investors

19
Q

Facts about Bubbles

A
  • Very high trading volumes
  • Extrapolative expectations
  • Sophisticated investors ‘riding the bubble’
  • Good fundamental news near the start of the price rise
20
Q

New models to understand bubbles

A

-All use extrapolation to get rising prices

  • Different in volume mechanisms
21
Q

Barberis et al. Model for Bubbles

A
  • Extrapolators form their beliefs based on two signals - value and growth signal (opposite directions)
  • relative weight an extrapolator puts on the two signals varies slightly over time
  • this is called wavering
  • variations stem from small fluctuations in relative attention extrapolators pay to the two signals
22
Q

Barberis et Al. Volume mechanism

A
  • degree of wavering is constant over time but endogenously generates much higher volumes during the bubble

Extrapolator i’s demand:
Wi,tVt + (1-Wi,t)Gt

  • 0.01 shift in Wi,t leads to a change in share demand of 0.01(|V-G|)
  • during normal times, value and growth signals have small magnitudes so shift in W leads to small demand shift
  • During Bubble, Value and growth signals have much higher values so shifts are much more impactful for demand
23
Q

DeFusco et al Model for bubbles

A
  • more tailored to the housing market
  • investors have different holding horizons - price increases endogenously attract short-term buyers more strongly than long-term buyers
  • Short-term buyers amplify volume by selling more frequently, and they destabilise prices through positive feedback
  • Model predicts a lead-lag relationship between volume and prices
24
Q

Liao, Peng, Zhu model for bubbles

A
  • Theory based on extrapolation and the disposition effect
  • Disposition effect: investors’ tendency to sell stocks trading at a gain and hold on to stocks with losses

During a bubble:
- Extrapolation induces outsiders to get in
- Disposition effect prompts insiders to get out
- leads to high volume