week 8 - interpersonal and romantic relationships Flashcards

1
Q

Why do people seek to relate with others?

A
  • a fundamental need for human affiliation
  • social support and wellbeing
  • obtaining social comparison information
  • the effects of social exclusion/ostracism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

why is ‘a fundamental need for human affiliation’ important?

A
  • evolutionary: affiliation and group living enhanced our prehistoric ancestors’ chances of survival and reproduction, as well as the survival of their offspring
  • as a result, natural selection may have forged a strong motive for affiliation as part of the human psyche
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why are interpersonal relations so important for social support and wellbeing?

A
  • a strong association between being in a relationship and overall wellbeing
  • mortality studies: (e.g., patients with coronary heart disease)
  • patients who were married or had a confidant (vs unmarried without a confidant) have a 30% higher chance of survival after 5 years
  • instrumental support - practical assistance
  • emotional support
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain Schachter’s (1959) study on affiliation in distressing situations

A

study 1
- female participants given choice to wait alone or with other people for a study in which they believe they would receive painful vs non-painful electric shocks
- those who expected painful shocks preferred to wait with others significantly more

study 2
- participants given choices to wait alone vs with women who’re waiting for tthe same study vs with women waiting for an academic tutorial
- “misery loves miserable company”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why are interpersonal relationships so important?

A

people affiliate to obtain info about other people’s attitudes and behaviours to:
- reduce uncertainty, ambiguity, and confusion
- provide guidance for how we should respond to the situation

Festinger’s (1954) social comparison theory:
- comparing oneself with others is essential for evaluating and enhancing aspects of life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the effects of social exclusion/ostracism/rejection?

A
  • Cyberball (William et al., 2000): a virtual ball-tossing game between a participant and who confederates (or computer-controlled)
  • participants are eventually excluded from receiving the ball
  • they reported “feeling bad, having less control, loosing a sense of belonging”
  • brain activity also showed that being socially excluded corresponded to the same neurological activity as when feeling physical pain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the link between loneliness and health?

A
  • loneliess is experienced by a substantial proportion of population
  • a meta-analysis of studies between 1980-2014 showed that loneliness and living alone increased the likelihood of mortality by 26/32%
  • a more recent meta-analysis showed medium to large effects of loneliness on all health outcomes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

physical appearance: what are the strengths and weaknesses of being attractive?

A

strengths
physically attractive people are more likely to
- be liked more on a first date
- raise higher sums of money for charity
- be successful in a job interview
- earn more money once they have a job
- be treated leniently in the legal system
- be perceived as trustworthy
- sometimes clled the physical attractiveness stereotype

weaknesses
e.g. more attractive people are often the subject of unwanted advancements and resentment from less attractive individuals. attractive children receive less empathy and help than children who are not as attractive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the matching phenomenon?

A
  • people are more likely to choose people who are a similar match to themselves (in terms of physical attractivness) as partners
  • asset matching: seeking complimentary ‘assets’ (e.g. wealth, intelligence, social circles etc) allows people to exchange what they want from a relationship

do people date others who are ‘out of their league’?
- Berscheid et al., 1971: the salience of possible rejection by the dating choice was varied. For all conditions of choice, people tend to approach people whose attractiveness is fairly close to their own
- Morgan et al., 2010: This study explored online personal ads of 294 heterosexual and homosexual men and women in the United States through a qualitative analysis and comparison of participant-generated “personal” and “preferred partner” narratives. Personal and preferred partner narratives contained similar constellations of characteristics, finding significant correlations on all three variables (i.e., physical, lifestyle, and personality characteristics).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is ‘asset matching’?

A

seeking complimentary ‘assets’ (e.g. wealth, intelligence, social circles etc) allows people to exchange what they want from a relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How do proximity and attraction link together?

A
  • being in close proximity to others can facilitate attraction - the propinquity effect
  • Back et al., (2008) randomly assigned students to sit next to someone, or in the same row as that peron, for one whole term. they found the closer students sat to the person, the more they like them
  • spatial proximity also amplifies attractiveness rating (Shin et al., 2018)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How do familiarity and attraction link?

A

repeated exposure effect on liking
- in a classroom setting, Moreland & Beach (1992) arranged four new female ‘students’ taking part in class on 0, 5, 10, 15 occasions
- they found that the new student was rated as more attractive the more often other students saw her

does familiarity always lead to attraction?

If the initial reaction is negative, repeated exposure may lead to hostility.
A meta-analysis by Montoya et al. (2017) revealed a ‘inverted U’ function that liking increases with repeated exposure but then decreases after a certain number of exposures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the Arousal attraction effect?

A

its possible for people to make mistakes about what is causing their physical arousal

arousal attraction effect (Dutton & Aron, 1975)
- male participants either crossed the risky Capilano suspension bridge or a safer bridge
- researcher (male vs female) at the end of the bridge asked them to fill out a questionnaire, and gave them a phone number to call in case they had any questions

results show a misattribution of physiological arousal for attraction. with the female experimenter, 40% of participants called when crossing the shaky bridge, vs the 10% who called when crossing the stable bridge.
When the experimenter was male, only 10% called when crossing the shaky bridge, and even less for the stable one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does similarity affect attraction?

A
  • similarity of attitudes, interests, and values is one of the most important positive psychological determinants of attraction
  • law of attraction: attraction towards a person is linearly related to the proportion of attitudes shared with them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does mutual liking affect attraction?

A

in general, we like people who like us and dislike people who dislike up (reciprocity principle)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who proposed the reinforcement affect model?

A

Byrne and Clore (1970)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the ‘reinforcement affect model’? (Byrne & Clore, 1970)

A

people can be liked or disliked depending on their association with positive/negative feelings
- liking by association: people associate others with features of the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did Griffitt and Veitch (1971) research about reinforcement in relationships?

A

heat, population density, and attitude similarity as independent variables - people associated others with features of the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What does social exchange theory posit?

A

relationships work like economic exchanges
e.g. love, status, information, money, goods, and services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

According to social exchange theory, what 3 things do people’s evaluation of their relationship depend on?

A
  • rewards gained from relationship
  • cost incurred from relationship
  • The relationship they expect (comparison levels) and the likelihood they could have a better relationship with another person (comparison levels for alternative)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is equity theory?

A
  • people are happiest in equitable relationships in which the cost-reward payoff is approx the same for both parties
  • oven-benefiting may lead to guilt
  • under-benefiting may lead to resentment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are 4 criticisms of social exchange and equity theory?

A
  • the rule-based system doesnt account for individual differences (e.g. how people perceive reward and cost)
  • it doesnt always work as an explanatory model for relationships - parents and children for example don’t follow these equity rules
  • in communal relationships, members are motivated to provide benefits without the expectation of receiving benefits in return
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is correlational evidence by Schafer & Keith (1980) for equity theory?

A

correlational studies of married couples
- people who perceived their relationship to be unfair felt more unhappy and distressed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is correlational evidence by Stafford and Canary (2006) for equity theory?

A
  • partners who perceived their relationship as fair experienced the most satisfaction, followed by those who over-venefitted, while under-benefitted partners showed the lowest satisfaction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What does an experimental study by Sprecher (2016) manipulate to suggest a causal link between equity and relationship satisfaction?

A

manipulation of equity: asked participants to write bout a past situation in their relationship where they either over-benefited, under-benefited, or where there was equity

26
Q

What is the evolutionary approach to relationships concerned with?

A
  • concerned with how various behaviours promote the survival of genes into subsequent generations
27
Q

What are some criticisms of the evolutionary approaches to reltionships?

A
  • studies mainly on heterosexual relationships
  • reinforces gender stereotypes
  • reductionist
  • does not consider personal experience
28
Q

What do cognitive behavioural approaches to relationships suggest?

A

perception of relationship events affects subjective experience

29
Q

What does Heider’s balance theory (1958) suggest about relationships (cognitive-behavioural theory)?

A
  • people sharing similar attitudes are likely to reach balance - a positive emotional state
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT): help people evaluate their maladaptive thinking and attribution as well as correct their communication and behaviour
30
Q

What do attachment theories suggest about relationships? what studies support this?

A

the need for affiliation is fundamental and powerful
- Harlow (1958) and Bowlby (1969) showed distressing effects of social deprivation on new-born rhesus monkeys and human infants
- Bowlby (1969) argued that infants’ attachment behaviours, such as seeking to be reunited with the mother, are indicators of the innate affilative drive
- attachment behaviour is not limited to the infant-caregiver experience but can also be observed throughout the life cycle

31
Q

WHo conducted the ‘strange situation study’ to examine attachment styles?

A

Ainsworth et al., 1978

32
Q

What are the 3 attachment styles defined by Hazan and Shaver (1987)?

A
  • Secure: trust and a secure feeling of being worthy and liked
  • avoidant: low trust and avoidance of relationships
  • anxious: concerned that feelings are not reciprocated

early attachment experiences are associated with the nature of attachment in adult relationships

33
Q

What are 2 types of love?

A
  • passionate love: intense and occasionally confused emotions
  • companionate love: calmer, friendly affection and attachment
34
Q

What 3 components are measured by the passionate love scale (Hatfield & Sprecher, 1986)?

A
  • cognitive components: (e.g. intrusive thinking)
  • emotional components (e.g. attraction to partner)
  • behavioural components (e.g. actions to determine other’s feelings)
35
Q

Who identified six basic love styles? (colours of love)

A

Lee (1973 & 1976)

36
Q

What are the 6 basic love styles identified by Lee (1973 & 1976)?

A
  • eros - passionate love
  • storge - friendship/companionate love
  • ludus - game-playing love
  • mania - posessive and dependent love
  • pragma - logical, practical, realistic love
  • agape - selfless, transcendent, unconditional love
37
Q

Who proposed the triangular theory of love?

A

Sternberg (1988)

38
Q

According to the triangular theory of love (Sternberg, 1988), what are the 3 key factors of love?

A
  • intimacy
  • passion
  • commitment

combinations of each results in different kinds of love

39
Q

According to the triangular theory of love (Sternberg, 1988), what is ‘liking’?

A

intimacy alone

40
Q

According to the triangular theory of love (Sternberg, 1988), what is ‘companionate love’?

A

intimacy + commitment

41
Q

According to the triangular theory of love (Sternberg, 1988), what is ‘empty love’?

A

commitment alone

42
Q

According to the triangular theory of love (Sternberg, 1988), what is ‘fatuous love’?

A

passion + commitment

43
Q

According to the triangular theory of love (Sternberg, 1988), what is ‘infatuation’?

A

passion alone

44
Q

According to the triangular theory of love (Sternberg, 1988), what is ‘romantic love’?

A

intimacy + passion

45
Q

According to the triangular theory of love (Sternberg, 1988), what is ‘consumate love’?

A

intimacy + passion + commitment

46
Q

What is the social-constructionist view of love?

A
  • love is a social construct (Beall & Sternberg, 1995)
  • societies/cultures in different time periods differ in their understanding of love. e.g.,
  • love became a foundation for marriage, which is a new development
  • monogamy and polygamy across cultures
47
Q

What are methods for studying relationships?

A

ways of studying intimacy ethically
- self report methods
- observation
- experiments
- interaction based methods
- physiological methods

48
Q

What are self-report methods for studying relationships?

A
  • questionnaires
  • diaries & interaction record studies
  • most common method (80%)
  • correlational
49
Q

What are advantages of self-report methods for studying relationships?

A

Tap into people’s subjective experiences, access private emotions

50
Q

What are disadvantages of self-report methods for studying relationships?

A
  • can’t establish causal relationships
  • reporting issues, demand characteristics, social desirability
  • responding to decontextualised hypothetical situations
51
Q

What are advantages of observational methods for studying relationships?

A
  • objective methods
  • reliable data
52
Q

What are disadvantages of observational methods for studying relationships?

A
  • time consuming
  • effect of recording
53
Q

What are advantages of experimental methods for studying relationships?

A
  • hypothesis testing
  • establish causal relationships
54
Q

What are disadvantages of experimental methods for studying relationships?

A
  • artificial
55
Q

What are advantages of interaction-based methods for studying relationships?

A
  • capture describable relationship practices
56
Q

What are disadvantages of interaction-based methods for studying relationships?

A
  • does not tap any traditional experimental criteria
57
Q

What is an example of physiological methods for studying relationships?

A

empathy within couples: “the female volunteers activated the affective component of their own pain experience when they observed their loved one receiving painful stimulation to his right hand” (Singer, 2006)

58
Q

What are advantages of physiological methods for studying relationships?

A

objective methods

59
Q

what are disadvantages of physiological methods for studying relationships?

A
  • technical
  • costly
  • invasive
60
Q

What are 4 critical issues in studying relationships?

A
  1. decontextualised
  2. disembodied relationship antecedents - film still vs complete film (partical, narrow, incomplete accounts of relatioships)
  3. sampling issues (heteronormative, ethnocentric)
  4. focus on problems