Week 8- Class I, III, VI direct composite restorations Flashcards
according to the ADA, if done properly, posterior composites can have same longevity of amalgams?
true
longevity of posterior composite directly r/t factors such as
restoration size
caries risk
operator technique
what is the main contraindication of posterior composite?
area that cannot be isolated
large occlusal stresses
if box extends onto tooth’s root surface:
do not use composite
advantages of composite restorations
aesthetics conserve tooth structure less complex tooth preps insulation decreased microleakage short term strength of remaining tooth structure
disadvantages of composite restorations
polymerization shrinkage low fracture toughness technique sensitive greater localized wear unknown biocompatibility
contraindication to pit & fissure sealant
active caries on tooth
pit/fissure sealants use
low viscosity resin after etching
process of applying sealant
- clean tooth with pumice
- rinse
- etch
- apply sealant
true or false: you can combine a small class I restoration with sealant
true
primary choice of restoration for primary occlusal lesions
preventative resin and composite restorations
class VI restorations
small faulty developmental pit on cusp tip
lesion usually restricted to enamel
how is retention obtained in class I direct composite restoration?
bonding
class I direct composite restoration
create convenience form
retention obtained by bonding
small to moderate class I restorations
conservative flared cavosurface forms
no uniform or flat pulpal/axial walls
moderate to large class I restorations
flat walls perpendicular to occlusal forces strong marginal configurations enter tooth area most affected FIRST depth .2mm internal to DEJ follow central groove
to maximize polymerization effects
cure incrementally