Week 7- Hearsay Flashcards
Define hearsay
A statement is hearsay if:
o it is made out of court; and
o the person that made it intended another person to believe it; and
o it is adduced as evidence of the matter stated.
In what circumstances can a spouse/civil partner of D be compelled to give evidence for the prosecution?
What are the limitations on privilege against self-incrimination?
What is examination in chief and what form of questioning should be used?
Describe how a witness might refresh their memory
Must be outside of court- can’t have witness statement in front of them
What is a hostile witness and how should they be treated?
What is the general rule regarding the admissibility of a witness’ previous allegations against D?
In what situations will evidence of previous allegations be admissible?
- Res Gestae
- D’s response to allegation by police
- Previous complaints by complainant where complainant testifies that the earlier complaint was in fact made and was true (s.120 CJA)
- As part of rebuttal of claim that witness is fabricating testimony
In cross-examination, what happens if you don’t challenge an element of a witness’ account of events?
In what circumstances is a police witness statement admissible?
What is the rule on finality of collateral matters?
The rule of finality to collateral matters prevents trials from splintering into multiple insignificant disputes about credibility related matters collateral to the issues in the case.
Eg: If a witness to a bank robbery is asked in cross examination whether they once lied on a mortgage application and they say no, the defence would be prohibited from adducing evidence of the mortgage application because the matter was collateral to main issues and the answer “no” was final in the eyes of the law.
What are the 3 stages of examination of a witness?
- Examination in chief (by side who called witness)
- Cross-examination (by other side)
- Re-examination (by side who calld witness)
What form of questioning can be used in cross-examination?
What is the general rule regarding admissibility of hearsay evidence?
What are the 4 groups of exceptions to the general rule against admissibility of hearsay?
s.114(1) CJA 2003
(a) Statute makes it admissible,
(b) any rule of law preserved by s.118 makes it admissible (i.e. preserved common law rules),
(c) Party agreement: all parties to the proceedings agree to it being admissible, or
(d) the court is satisfied that it is in the interests of justice for it to be admissible.’