Week 7-Clinical Aspects of Social Development Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Why is a core diagnostic feature of autism that it’s defined at a behavioural level?

A

Currently, there are no reliable diagnostic biological indicators (e.g. specific brain abnormalities)
■ Earliest possible age of diagnosis: 2-3 years; More commonly: 4-5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the DSM-IV criteria based on “The triad of atypical behaviours” (Wing & Gould, 1979) include in diagnosis?

A

-impairments in social interaction
-impairments in communication
-repetitive behaviours within a narrow set of interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

True or false: Studies have shown these subtype distinctions in autism are not entirely useful for research purposes or in clinical practice (e.g., Huerta et al., 2012; Ozonoff, 2012)

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the requirements to meet diagnostic criteria for ASD in children?

A

a child must have persistent deficits in each of 3 areas of social communication and interaction + at least 2 of 4 types of restricted, repetitive behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the symptom severity levels used in ASD diagnosis?

A

Level 3:”Requiring very substantial support”
Level 2:”Requiring substantial support”
Level 1:”Requiring support”
–Important for clinical planning
–Explicit recognition of the quantitative variability of the
condition (i.e. spectrum)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explanations for autism: Define Central Coherence Hypothesis (Frith, 1989)

A

–Autism is related to a lack of central coherence, reflected in the tendency to process information piecemeal, rather than to integrate it (Frith & Happé, 1994).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the embedded figures test

A

-locating a ‘hidden’ figure (e.g. triangle) in a larger, more complex design.
“Field-Independent” individuals= locate the shape more quickly, being more ready to perceive the constituent parts.
“Field-dependent” individuals= process the “whole”, and are less likely to perceptually deconstruct the visual array into constituent parts.
Individuals with autism tend to be “field-independent” (their tendency towards processing the details is viewed as a processing bias, though not necessarily an impairment.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Happé & Frith, 2006 find?

A

–Some abilities to integrate at a “global” (bigger picture) level but there is a processing bias for local>global levels of info.
–This is not reducible to executive dysfunction, and is only weakly related to social cognition deficits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explaining autism: Define the Executive Function Hypothesis (Ozonoff, Pennington, & Rogers, 1991):

A

autism might be related to a deficit in executive function.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is executive function?

A

the ability to maintain an appropriate problem-solving mindset for the attainment of a future goal., including behaviours such as:
■ planning
■ impulse control, and inhibition of irrelevant responses
■ problem-solving mindset maintained
■ organized search
■ flexibility of thought and action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the behaviour of autistic children in relation to executive function deficits?

A

1.rigid and inflexible:they often become distressed over trivial environmental changes, and insist on following routines in precise detail.
2.perseverative: often focus on one narrow interest or repetitively engage in one stereotyped behaviour.
3.not future-oriented:they do not anticipate long-term consequences of behaviour well, and have great difficulty self-reflecting and self-monitoring.
4.impulsive: they seem unable to delay or inhibit responses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explaining autism: Define the Theory of mind hypothesis (Baron-Cohen, Leslie, & Frith, 1985)

A

the view that people with autism have difficulties in understanding that others have thoughts and beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain what the False Belief Test demonstrates

A

typically developing children will pass this around 4 yrs old those with autism generally fail indicating that they have an impoverished level of social understanding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 3 impairments in Wing’s triad of impairments characteristic of autism (Wing & Gould, 1979)?

A

■ Social relationships
■ Communication
■ Imagination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How is a lack of imagination seen in children with autism?

A

-Autistic children are severely impaired in their pretend play production.
Leslie (1987) suggested a correspondence between:
■The imaginative disengagement from current reality needed for false belief/exhibited in pretend play.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is socialisation and communication seen in children with autism?

A

–Individuals would be in danger of misjudging social situations,
of acting in an inappropriate way, and of saying inappropriate
things. (underdeveloped ToM)
-Social skill often depends on being able to diagnose
other people’s sensitivities, attitudes and knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was found in Baron-Cohen, Leslie and Frith (1985) false belief test success wise?

A

–20 participants with autism
(mental age ≥ 4 years)=20% success
–14 participants with Down’s syndrome (mental age ≥ 4 years)=86%
–27 typically developing participants (chronological age ≥ 4 years)=85%
-The difficulty in acknowledging false belief therefore seemed to arise from autism rather than any associated learning disabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Explain the false photo test

A

■ a doll sat on a box (scene 1) and the participant took a photo of it.
■ the doll was then moved to a mat (scene 2).
■ participants were asked which scene (1 or 2) would show in the developed photo.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did Leslie and Thaiss (1992) find in both types of false tests?

A

–Typically developing children would pass both tests.
–Autistic children would only pass the False Photo Test.
ALSO
Cassidy, Ropar, Mitchell, & Chapman, 2014:
–Adults with autism found to be less capable of retrodicting (guessing what causes a reaction) events involving recognition of genuine and feigned positive emotions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What about autistic individuals who pass the false belief test?

A

Baron-Cohen (1989) suggested second-order belief attribution: Not what a person thinks about an aspect of reality (e.g., where Sally thinks her ball is)
BUT what a person thinks another person thinks about an aspect of reality (e.g., where Mary thinks Sally thinks her ball is)
■ Individuals with autism who passed a simple false belief test failed this complex test more frequently than those typically developing, or with Down’s syndrome.

21
Q

Give contradictory evidence on the false belief test results seen given by Bowler, 1992

A

–Some high functioning adults with autism pass both belief tests.
–Although they can process simple and complex beliefs, these individuals still present the defining features of
autism.

22
Q

Give 3 facts about social anxiety

A

1.One of the most common anxiety disorders, with a lifetime prevalence of 13.3% (Kessler et al., 1994)
2.Severe and disabling and, without treatment, tends to run a chronic course(Solyom et al., 1986)
3.Characterised by a marked fear of scrutiny and evaluation by others(Rapee, 1995)

23
Q

What does social anxiety result in?

A

–severely restricted social functioning
–significant somatic(body), affective(emotions) and cognitive disturbances

24
Q

What can be some causes/contributors to social anxiety?

A

■ Aggregates in families
– 25% children of affected parents develop anxiety disorder
■ Genetic contribution is modest
■ Parenting likely to be important(Murray, Creswell, & Cooper, 2009)

25
Q

Maternal Social phobia effects: what was the process used?

A

■ Mother-infant face-to-face=5 mins
■ Stranger=2.5 mins where the stranger approaches, pauses and picks-up
-infants were 10 weeks old

26
Q

True or false: maternal behaviour with the infant is similar in both the control/social phobic mothers in relation to sensitivity (responsiveness)

A

True

27
Q

True or false: infant behaviour with the control/social phobic mother is the same in relation to positive communication/distress shown

A

True

28
Q

What were the results of the maternal social phobic effects experiment?

A

-Infants of mothers with social phobia showed diminished social
responsiveness by 10 weeks (decrease in positive communication during interactions with a stranger)
-mum showed less engagement to stranger and infant paid more attention to mum when she had social phobia

29
Q

What may be the cause of these socially phobic maternal effects?

A

– Infants highly sensitive to adult communication in first few
months (voice quality, gaze direction, contingency, facial expressions of emotion)
–Mothers tend to modulate these behaviours to maintain + regulate infant engagement and affect
–reduced social responsiveness seen in infants with socially phobic mums might be a consequence of the attenuation of these regulatory maternal behaviours
■ socially phobic mothers=more withdrawal and less encouraging
ostensive marking in the presence of the stranger

30
Q

When do infants typically develop a fear of strangers?

A

9-12 months

31
Q

What does social referencing show about infants?

A

■ Infant sensitivity to maternal signals seen around 12m (Feinman, Roberts, Hsieh, Sawyer, & Swanson, 1992; Baldwin & Moses, 1996)
■ Infants sensitive to both +/-maternal messages to a non-social referent
–Gerull and Rapee (2002) trained mothers to either express fear/disgust to possible fear-provoking toys OR display neutral expressions, when toddler was present
■ Infants sensitive to positive maternal messages to a social referent(Feiring, Lewis, & Starr, 1984)

32
Q

Explain the social referencing (observational learning)
paradigm experiment

A

10 14 months
– Episode 1:mother interacts with stranger (2 min) infant observes
– Episode 2:stranger makes graded approach to infant (2 min) infant observes mum’s response
Behavioural Inhibition (fearful/inhibited/withdrawn behaviour towards novelty) may influence this
-It’s a temperamental trait with a genetic component

33
Q

What were the results with the social referencing (observational learning) paradigm from 10-14 months?

A

Mothers with Social Phobia vs. Control:
–Sig. more socially anxious in Episode 1 and 2 at 10- and 14-
months
–Sig less engaged with the stranger at 10- and 14-months
–Tendency to be less encouraging of their infant’s interaction with the stranger at 10-months (p = .07)

34
Q

True or false: The level of maternal positive encouragement in engaging the stranger (10 months) was found to mediate (explain) these differences in infant avoidance to the stranger

A

True

35
Q

How can infant behaviour change around strangers from 10-14 months in the presence of socially phobic mums?

A

■Inhibited infants of mums with social phobia became more avoidant during the stranger approach over time(mediated by low levels of encouragement by mums with social phobia)
-Also become more avoidant of the stranger during the pick-up over time (mediated by maternal expressed anxiety during the infant-stranger interaction) at 10-months

36
Q

How can infant behaviour change around strangers from 10-14 months in the presence of socially phobic mums?

A

■Inhibited infants of mums with social phobia became more avoidant during the stranger approach over time(mediated by low levels of encouragement by mums with social phobia)
-Also become more avoidant of the stranger during the pick-up over time (mediated by maternal expressed anxiety during the infant-stranger interaction)

37
Q

Define parental narratives

A

specific types of conversation where a story is related about
experiences
■Experiences undergo cognitive + affective (emotional) processing, children need to make sense of what happens to them (parental narratives can support this)

38
Q

What do parental narratives provide?

A

–Coherence
–Temporal and causal structure
–Links between internal states and behaviours
–Highlighting of salient experiences
–Socialisation regarding circumstances for different emotions
–Meaning-making function

39
Q

What could be the potential challenges for the mother when her child starts school?

A

–Mother encounters unfamiliar people
–Needs to help child adjust to new situation, including social relationships

40
Q

What assessments were done in the study of social phobic mothers/children starting school?

A

1)Preschool
■Maternal mental state
■Mother-child narrative about starting school
–Picture book as prompt, showing preparation, arrival, classroom, playground
■Child Doll Play representations
–Scenarios depicting range of school experiences, as above
2)2nd half term
■ Child’s mental state
■Internalising problems (e.g., withdrawn, anxious-depressed behaviour)

41
Q

What narrative coding for anxiety-relevant maternal cognitions were used?

A

■Encouragement/autonomy promotion (to navigating new experience)
■Attribution of threat to the environment
■Attribution of vulnerability to the child (giving impression child may not be able to navigate)
■Promotion of avoidance

42
Q

True or false: 57.53% of index group mothers no longer met full DSM-IV criteria for Social Phobia in school experiment

A

True BUT their symptoms for social phobia were much higher than the control group so were still included in the group overall

43
Q

School study: what was found about maternal narratives

A

-control group much higher in + encouragement
-social phobia group much higher on attribution of threat/vulnerability and avoidance promotion
Independent of maternal anxiety, behavioural inhibition was associated with higher attribution of threat

44
Q

School study: what was found with child doll play representations? (re-enacts potential school situations with dolls)

A

■Negative representation about school:sig more likely in children of mothers with Social Phobia than controls
■Children with negative representations:mothers showed sig less positive encouragement in their narratives
■Relationship between representation/maternal + encouragement: dependent on the child’s behavioural inhibition (high=+ encouragement has a huge effect reducing this)

45
Q

Explain Differential Susceptibility

A

Belsky and Pluess (2009):
–Go beyond the ‘diathesis-stress’ model
–Certain temperamental/genetic traits may cause a greater vulnerability to negative environments BUT a greater capacity to benefit from positive environments
■Child behavioural inhibition could be seen as a kind of sensitivity, with its +/- connotations.

46
Q

True or false: Child Social Anxiety cause wise has an association with positive maternal encouragement

A

False it doesn’t, the attribution of threat tends to play a larger role (+ encouragement more a mediator rather than a cause)

47
Q

What were the maternal ratings with children’s internalising problems?

A

-social phobic mums had kids with higher internalising problems compared to the control
■ The level of positive encouragement in maternal narratives was found to mediate (explain) this difference.

48
Q

What were teacher’s ratings with children internalising problems?

A

■Internalising problems only with high behavioural inhibition:
–Low maternal encouragement
was associated with higher
teacher-reported internalising
scores