Week 6, Liquidity Risk and the Protection of deposits Flashcards
Explain what Liquidity risk is and how it can arise from both sides of the balance sheet
Liquidity risk is the risk where an ADI has a shortage
of liquidity, it will not be able to access funds to make
payments as they become due.
Liquidity risk can arise on both sides of the balance
sheet: the asset side as well as the liability side.
Liability side: Depositors and other claim holders decide to cash in their financial claims immediately.
Asset side: Borrowers decide to use the loan commitment facilities provided by the ADI.
Explain the costs to the FI if there is a liquidity crisis
Shortage of liquidity exposes the ADI to additional costs.
Higher cost of borrowing (at short notice or ad hoc
borrow)
High costs for turning illiquid assets into cash
Quick asset sales may result in; in worst case, firesale
price.
What are the consequences of failure to meet liquidity to the FI
If payment can not be made
- threatens confidence in ADI
- may cause a Bank Run
- disrupt to financial system (contagion effect)
How does an ADI estimate the need of its funds?
ADIs must estimate funds needs, which is based on deposit inflows and outflows and varying levels of loan
commitment.
Inflows – Settlements, Holding of Liquid assets, access
to borrowed funds
Outflows – withdrawals from saving, drawings on loans
How can ADI meet liquidity
ADIs can meet liquidity needs via either asset liquidity
and/or liability liquidity
Asset management – meeting liquidity needs by using
near-cash assets, securitisation.
Liability management – meeting liquidity needs by using
outside sources of discretionary funds
How does a liquidity affect the banks risk and return (3 points)
From a policy standpoint, an ADI should develop a liquidity plan or strategy that balances risks and returns.
Excessive liquidity (or liquidity buffer) offers safety but can decrease bank profits.
Aggressive liability management can increase bank profits but can also increase the risk of illiquidity problems.
What are the Risks to Central Banks if there is a liquidity problem in one of its FIs
Central Banks are worried about systemic risk because
they are also responsible for financial system stability
Define systemic risk
Events which may jeopardise financial system stability
and cause harm to the real economy
They may include the risk that the failure of one participant in a payments system, or in financial markets generally, to meet their required obligations when due, will cause other participants or financial institutions to be unable to meet their obligations (including settlement obligations in a transfer system) when due. Such a failure may cause significant liquidity or credit problems.
If bank failure occurs in a multilateral net settlement system, what are the 3 main ways to ensure that settlement can proceed
- “defaulter pays” system: liquidate the assets of the default FI to pay others
- “survivor pays” system: those who didn’t fail need to make-up difference by failed FIs
- The Central Bank provides the funds
In handling systemic risk, what does the Central bank need to consider
The design of the payments clearing system
The risk that an institution will be unable to meet its
obligations
Enforceable arrangements
Likely disruption to the financial system
What are APRA responsibility for Liquidity Management (3 points)
- Shall implement and maintain a liquidity management strategy that is appropriate for the operations of the ADI to ensure that it has sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations as they fall due.
- Shall adhere to its liquidity management strategy at all times and review it regularly (at least annually) to take account of changing operating circumstances.
- Shall inform APRA immediately of any concerns it has about its current or future liquidity, as well as its plans to address these concerns
How does RBA help ADI manage their liquidity requirements and therefore achieve financial system stability
A safe and efficient payments system is essential to
support the day-to-day business of the Australian economy
and to settle transactions in its financial markets.
When payments are cleared between institutions, they
accrue obligations which must be settled.
In Australia, final settlement of obligations between
payments providers is by entries to their Exchange
Settlement (ES) accounts at the Reserve Bank
Explain the function of the Exchange Settlement Accounts and how they operate
In Australia, Exchange settlement accounts are provided
by and held at RBA for settlement of inter-bank
transactions.
FIs make use of ESAs to make payments on behalf of
customers.
Settlements take place by debiting and crediting the ESAs
Balances are deposits of undisputed quality; and They provide a convenient central mechanism for effecting settlement
What is the RITS of the rba
How are high value payments settled
How are the outstanding balance pf payments settled
RBA Information and Transfer System (RITS)
RITS is the means by which ESAs are accessed and it
facilitates banks’ credit and liquidity management by providing tools with which they can exercise control over the settlement of payments.
Australia’s high-value payments system across
which settlement of interbank payment obligations
occurs on a real-time gross settlement (RTGS)
basis.
Over 90% of interbank payments by value are
settled on an RTGS basis
The balance of outstanding payments is settled under
a deferred net settlement (DNS)
What is the difference between RTGS and DNS
RTGS: banks settle all high-value payments in real
time across their ES accounts (90% payments
settled through the RTGS systems in Australia)
DNS: is used for high volume low value transactions