Week 6-10 Flashcards
Uses of aggressive appearance and behavior
1) Protect food access
2) Protect territory
3) Protect reproductive opportunities
Novel environment hypothesis
Hypotheses to explain maladaptive responses to signals (when signals call for mates but also predators)
Current environment is sufficiently different from that in which the behavior evolved that there has not been enough time for a species to adapt
Net benefit hypothesis
Hypotheses to explain maladaptive responses to signals (when signals call for mates but also predators)
Sensory mechanism that may result in fitness losses for some individuals under some circumstances but does not erase the fitness gains that receivers derive on average for reacting to a sender in a particular way
Sexual selection
Mechanism of evolution that occurs when organisms compete for mates
Can lead to emergence of traits that can expose individuals to predators (decrease survival) but increase reproductive chance
Anisogamy
Sexual reproduction where the fusing gametes differ significantly in size
All Possible mating structures
- Monogamy (female = 1; male = 1)
- Polygyny (female = 2+; male = 1)
- Polyandry (female = 1; male = +2)
- Polygynandry and promiscuity (female = 2+; male = 2+ )
Hypothesis underlying monogamy (3)
1) Mate limitation: hard to find mates
2) Mate guarding: possible to restrict mating of others
3) Mate assistance: hard to raise offspring alone
Female defense polygyny hypothesis
(Hypothesis to explain why males are polygynous)
Resources are evenly distributed in space but females form groups to better access those resources or to help dilute the risk of predation, males will follow and guard a group of females
- Crabs with shells
Resource defense polygyny hypothesis
(Hypothesis to explain why males are polygynous)
When resources are clumped, attract multiple females, and are easily defensible, males will guard the resources (and by extension the females) by setting up a territory
- African cichlids with shells
Lek polygyny hypothesis
When resources are distributed heterogeneously and females are widespread and do not form groups, males will wait for females to come to them
- Topi in lek
Scramble competition polygyny hypothesis
When resources are distributed heterogeneously and females are widespread and do not form groups, males will seek out females
4 criteria to determine if a species form a lek
1) displaying individuals are spatially aggregated
2) displaying individuals contribute nothing to offspring or their mates beyond gametes
3) choosy sex visits the lek only to mate
4) choosy sex has unrestrained access to mating partners
Hotspot hypothesis
(Hypothesis to explain why males congregate at leks)
Males cluster in places (“hotspots”) where the routes frequently traveled by receptive females intersect
Hotshot hypothesis
(Hypothesis to explain why males congregate at leks)
Subordinate males cluster around highly attractive males to have a chance to interact with females drawn to these “hotshots”
Reproductive insurance hypothesis
Mothers in siblicidal species lay a second egg as insurance against hatching failure