Week 5 (Theories) Flashcards
What is theory?
Theory: A collection of propositions, assumptions or facts that explain and predicts the effects of processes or behaviours
Not a set of unbending rules, but a guide
Why bother with theory?
Help determine appropriate goals and objectives as well as the strategies used to achieve these.
(Austin & Pinkleton, 2006)
Academic foundation makes PR practitioners more effective in managing relationships between publics and an organisation –>
now a management discipline (Moncour, 200^)
Understand why a certain campaign failed
Public relations theory is…
an integration of academic principles of communication, pr research and case history.
Draws on other disciplines, e.g. psychology, sociology, business management, journalism and anthropology
Where does ‘Propaganda’ come from?
1600s - Catholic Church established a College of Propaganda to “help propagate the faith”
Lost respectability with the allies use of it in the Great War and Nazi’s use in WWII
Edward Bernays (Propaganda, 1928)
- importance of “the conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organised habits and opinions of the masses in democratic society”
Believed that it was part of democratic ideals (Harold Lasswell disagrees)
Jowett and O’Donnell, Grunig and Hunt Propaganda view
Jowett and O’Donnell, Grunig and Hunt - refer to the manipulation to further the desired intent of the propagandist: use ‘propaganda’ to denote income, distorted or half-true information
Kevin Moloney classification of public relations
“PR… is public communication designed to manipulate or persuade. It is weak propaganda - more ‘ordering’ and ‘telling’ than ‘listening’ and ‘talking’
Moloney’s theory suggests that whatever the honourable intentions of PR people: “Modern PR is competitive communication seeking advantage for its principals…”
Symmetrical/excellence theory
Developed mid 1990s
Implies that ideal pr work can be achieved by symmetrical two-way communication
If two-way, should be win win → possible if parties are able to reach agreement or at least partial agreement, however ultimately opposed they are:
“Excellent public relations departments develop programs to communicate actively and symmetrically with activists. Organisations that collaborate with activists develop a competitive advantage… because they behave in a way that is acceptable to publics and therefore make fewer decisions that results in negative publicity and regulation, litigation and opposition” (Botan & Hazleton, 2006)
Grunig and Hunt’s ‘Four Models’ 1984
- Press agentry / publicity model (stunts)
- Public information model (accurate info disseminated
- Two-way asymmetric model (open dialogue, modifies messages to influence audience)
- Two-way symmetric model
(feedback used to change organisational practices)
Critics of Symmetrical/excellence model
Moloney 2006: “communicative idealism”
Situational Theory
Non-publics (not worried about it)
Latent publics (not aware of it)
Aware publics (know and might be come ACTIVE) (only if they’re sufficiently motivated and feel as though they can create change)
Systems Theory
An org can be seen as a system. When it is working properly it is in ‘equilibrium’
Boundary spanner –> when the org crosses boundaries with departments or even communicates to external systems
Open and closed systems
Hierarchy of effects theory
Suggests sequence in which people may come to be persuaded:
- Awareness
- Comprehension
- Agreement or acceptance
- Retention of the acceptance and consequence behaviour change
A PR campaign needs to be designed with these stages in mind
Persuasion and media effects theory
20th century - interest grew in the ways mass media affected public opinion and purchasing decisions
No longer believe hypodermic needle theory
Main concepts:
Beliefs: may be shaped by formal/informal education or lack of it; political social, cultural, economic factors; religious observance
Attitudes: arise from rational and irrational beliefs
Opinion: Ultimate expression of people’s knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, values and knowledge
Agenda-setting theory
Theory that news media suggest an agenda of what the think about (not what to think)
News media prioritise what news is ‘important’