Week 5 (Theories) Flashcards

1
Q

What is theory?

A

Theory: A collection of propositions, assumptions or facts that explain and predicts the effects of processes or behaviours
Not a set of unbending rules, but a guide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why bother with theory?

A

Help determine appropriate goals and objectives as well as the strategies used to achieve these.
(Austin & Pinkleton, 2006)

Academic foundation makes PR practitioners more effective in managing relationships between publics and an organisation –>
now a management discipline (Moncour, 200^)

Understand why a certain campaign failed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Public relations theory is…

A

an integration of academic principles of communication, pr research and case history.

Draws on other disciplines, e.g. psychology, sociology, business management, journalism and anthropology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Where does ‘Propaganda’ come from?

A

1600s - Catholic Church established a College of Propaganda to “help propagate the faith”

Lost respectability with the allies use of it in the Great War and Nazi’s use in WWII

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Edward Bernays (Propaganda, 1928)

A
  • importance of “the conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organised habits and opinions of the masses in democratic society”

Believed that it was part of democratic ideals (Harold Lasswell disagrees)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Jowett and O’Donnell, Grunig and Hunt Propaganda view

A

Jowett and O’Donnell, Grunig and Hunt - refer to the manipulation to further the desired intent of the propagandist: use ‘propaganda’ to denote income, distorted or half-true information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Kevin Moloney classification of public relations

A

“PR… is public communication designed to manipulate or persuade. It is weak propaganda - more ‘ordering’ and ‘telling’ than ‘listening’ and ‘talking’

Moloney’s theory suggests that whatever the honourable intentions of PR people: “Modern PR is competitive communication seeking advantage for its principals…”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Symmetrical/excellence theory

A

Developed mid 1990s

Implies that ideal pr work can be achieved by symmetrical two-way communication

If two-way, should be win win → possible if parties are able to reach agreement or at least partial agreement, however ultimately opposed they are:

“Excellent public relations departments develop programs to communicate actively and symmetrically with activists. Organisations that collaborate with activists develop a competitive advantage… because they behave in a way that is acceptable to publics and therefore make fewer decisions that results in negative publicity and regulation, litigation and opposition” (Botan & Hazleton, 2006)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Grunig and Hunt’s ‘Four Models’ 1984

A
  1. Press agentry / publicity model (stunts)
  2. Public information model (accurate info disseminated
  3. Two-way asymmetric model (open dialogue, modifies messages to influence audience)
  4. Two-way symmetric model
    (feedback used to change organisational practices)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Critics of Symmetrical/excellence model

A

Moloney 2006: “communicative idealism”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Situational Theory

A

Non-publics (not worried about it)

Latent publics (not aware of it)

Aware publics (know and might be come ACTIVE) (only if they’re sufficiently motivated and feel as though they can create change)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Systems Theory

A

An org can be seen as a system. When it is working properly it is in ‘equilibrium’

Boundary spanner –> when the org crosses boundaries with departments or even communicates to external systems

Open and closed systems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hierarchy of effects theory

A

Suggests sequence in which people may come to be persuaded:

  1. Awareness
  2. Comprehension
  3. Agreement or acceptance
  4. Retention of the acceptance and consequence behaviour change

A PR campaign needs to be designed with these stages in mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Persuasion and media effects theory

A

20th century - interest grew in the ways mass media affected public opinion and purchasing decisions
No longer believe hypodermic needle theory

Main concepts:

Beliefs: may be shaped by formal/informal education or lack of it; political social, cultural, economic factors; religious observance

Attitudes: arise from rational and irrational beliefs

Opinion: Ultimate expression of people’s knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, values and knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Agenda-setting theory

A

Theory that news media suggest an agenda of what the think about (not what to think)
News media prioritise what news is ‘important’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Social exchange theory

A

Points that people are more likely to open their minds and behave in a certain way if there is an exchange of good will
E.g. local company sponsoring the town sports team; MD taking into account employee wished before seeking reciprocal consideration

17
Q

Elaboration likelihood theory

A

Sometimes the most effective way to get a message across is to send the same message in different ways via different media

Same message, different mediums
Reinforces the message

18
Q

Co-orientation theory

A

Do not presume how others think!

Co-orientation theory looks into internal thinking → how people code their communication
Importance of testing campaign messages on a sample public before general release

Importance of testing campaign messages before releasing them

19
Q

Framing theory

A

The use of styles of discourse that ‘frame’ a discussion in someone’s preferred terms