Week 5 Flashcards
when does an oligopoly occur?
when a few firms between them share a large proportion of the industry. eg coke, ford
- downward sloping relatively inelastic, depends on reactions of rivals
what are the barriers to entry in a oligpoly?
unlike firms under monopolistic competition, there are barriers to entry few new firms, they are similar to a monopoly
- the size of the business, which will vary from industry to indsutry
-
what is the interdependence under oligopoly?
one of the two key features of an oligopoly
- each firm is affected by its rivals’ decisions and its decisions will affects its rivals,
- firms recognise this interdependence and take it into account when making decisions
what does the interdependence of ogliopolists mean for firms?
they either have to collude or compete
what is collusive oligopoly?
when oligopolisits agree formally or informally, to limit competition between themselves. they may set output quotas, fix prices, limit product promotion or development or agree not to pinch each others markets
what is non-collusive oligopoly?
when oligopolists have an agreement between themselves -f ormal, informal, in tacit
- where firms compete with each other and follow their own price, quantity and output policy independent of its rivals
what is cartel?
a formal collusive agreement, the cartel will maximise profit by acting like a monopolist, with the members behaving as if they were a single firm
what is a quota (set by a cartel)?
the output that given member of a cartel is allowed to produce (production quota) or sell (sales quota)
- allows members to share a market and prevents non-price competition
what is tacit collusion?
when oligopolists follow unwritten ‘rules’ of collusive behaviour, such as price leadership. they will take care not to engage in price cutting, excessive advertising or other forms of competition
what is dominant firm price leadership?
when firms (the followers) choose the same price as that set by the dominant firm in the industry (the leader).
- the leaders set the price by making assumptions on its rivals reactions to price changes, it assume that rivals will follow
- the leader will maximise profits where its MR = MC, it knows where its current position on the demand curve is then estimates how it would change in a an industry wide price changes and constructs its demand and MR curves on that basis
what is barometric firm price leadership?
when the price leader is the one whose prices are believed to reflect market conditions in the most satisfactory way
- it tries to estimate demand and MR curves and sets the price where MC = MR
- in practice which firm takes this role changes, as any firm may change their prices
what is wrong with the dominant firm price leadership?
the model assumes that followers will want to maintain a constant market share
its possible that is leaders raise their prices, the followers may want to supply more due to the new price
- on the other hand, followers may want to maintain hat they have for fear of invoking retaliations from the leader in the form of price cuts or aggressive advertising
what is average cost pricing?
another type of tacit collusions, rather than having a leader you can have a established set of rules that people follow
- where a firm sets its price by adding a certain % for average profit on top of average cost
what is price benchmarks?
this is price that typically is used. firms, when raising prices, usually will raise them from one benchmark to the another eg when costs go up
what are factors favouring collusion?
- there are only few firms
- they are open with each other about costs and production methods
- have similar production methods and AC and so are likely to change prices at similar times by same %
- they produce similar products
- there is a dominant firm
- there are significant barriers to entry so little fear of new firms
- market it stable, makes it easier to reach agreements
- no government measure or curb collusions
what is the cournot model?
a model of oliogpoly where each firm makes its price and output decisions on the assumption that its rival will produce a particular quantity
- profit will be less in this model than that under a monopoly or cartel as the price will be lower than monopoly price
what is duopoly?
an oligopoly where there are just two firms in the market
what is the Bertrand model?
a model based on the assumption that rival firms set a particular price and stick to it, eg supermarkets
what is nash equilibrium?
the equilibrium outcome in both the cournot and bertrand models is not in the joint interests of the firms,
- in each case, total profits are less than under a monopoly or cartel but in the absence of collisions, the outcome is each firm doing the best it can given its assumption about what its rivals are doing -> nash equilibrium
what is takeover bid?
where one firm attempts to purchase another to buy the shares of that company from its shareholders
what is kinked demand theory?
A kinked demand curve model occurs because of strategic competition:
-If a firm raises its price, its rivals will not follow. The firm will now find their demand more elastic as consumers switch away to
rivals! (i.e. a flatter curve)
- If a firm reduces its price, rivals will feel forced to lower theirs too (will just move down the demand curve)
what assumptions is the kinked demand model based on?
1- if a firm cuts it prices, its rivals will feel forced to follow suit and cut them, to prevent losing customers to the first firm
= a fall in price, will bring a small increase in sales, since rivals lowers their prices so people dont switch, the firm will hesitate to lower it price. Demand is inelastic below the kink
2- if a firm raises its prices, its rivals wont follow suit since, by keeping their prices the same, they will thereby gain customers from the first firm
= on this a rise in price will lead to a large fall in sales and people will switch to lower priced rivals and so the firm will hesitate to raise its price. demand is now elastic above the kink
why is a oligopoly more advantageous than a monopoly?
- depending on the size of the individual oligopolists, there may be less scope for economies of scale to lower costs and mitiage the effects of market power
- oligopolists are likely to engage in more extensive advertising than a monopolist, this will raise costs. consumer could end up paying, higher prices though it may lead to product development and better info about the product
why is the oligopoly more beneficial to the consumer than other market structures?>
- oligopolists can use part of their supernormal profits for R&D, unlike monopolists, ogliopolistis will have an incentive to do so. if the product design is improve, it may allow the firm to capture a larger share of the marker and it may be some time before rivals can improve theirs. If tech also improves it could result in higher profits which will improve the firms capacity to withstand a price war
- Non-price competition through product differentiation may result in greater choice for the consumer. Take the case of tablets or mobile phones. Non-price competition has led to a huge range of different products of many different specifications, each meeting the specific requirements of different consumers.
what is countervailing power?
when the power of a monopolistic/ oligopolistic seller is offset by powerful buyers who can prevent the price from being pushed up
what is the link between oligopoly and contestable markets?
- The lower the entry and exit costs for new firms, the more difficult it will be for oligopolists to collude and make supernormal profits. If oligopolists do form a cartel (whether legal or illegal), it will be difficult to maintain it if there is a threat of competition from new entrants.
- What a cartel has to do in such a situation is to erect entry barriers, thereby making the ‘contest’ more difficult. For example, the cartel could have a research laboratory, denied to outsiders. It might control the distribution of the finished product by buying up wholesale. Or it might let it be known to potential entrants that they will face fallout price, advertising and product competition from all the members if they should dare to set up in competition.
- The industry can behave competitively if entry and exit costs are low, with all the benefits and costs to the consumer of such competition – even if the new firms do not actually enter. However, if entry and/or exit costs are high, the degree of competition simply will depend on the relations between existing members of the industry.
what are the criticism of the traditional profit- maximising theory?
- firms may not have the information to maximise profits
- they may not even want to maximise profits
- firms dont use MR and MC concepts, even if they know how much they’re selling in a moment, this gives them only one point on their curve and no point at all on their MR curve
- firms operate in a changing environment, demand and supply curves shift, some of this occurs due to factors outside of the firms control, some are a result of a firms policies
what does the traditional theory of the firm assume?
that the owners of the firm make price and output decisions, it assumes that owners want to maximise profits, which is a critique of the theory. but do owners always want to?
what is profit satisficing?
where decision makers in a firm aim for a target level of profit rather than the absolute maximum level, by not aiming for the max profit, it allows managers to pursue other objectives, such as sales maximisation as their own salary or prestige
what is behavioural economics of the firm?
attempts to explain why the behaviour of firms deviate from traditional profit maximising because of the managerial use of mental shortcuts to simplify complex decisions and also managerial preferences for fairness