Week 5 Flashcards
Vertical integration
When a firm takes over ownership of its production, of its inputs, or of the channels it uses to distribute its output.
Diversification
Variety of products a firm offers, or the markets/geographic locations it competes in.
Corporate strategy
Diversification and Vertical Integration are part of corporate strategy.
Corporate strategy involves the decisions that leaders make and the goal-directed actions they take to gain competitive advantage in several industries/markets.
Business strategy on the other hand focuses on how to compete in a single product market.
3 dimensions of corporate strategy that managers need to decide on
- Vertical integration (which stages of the value chain should the firm participate in?);
- Diversification (what range of products and services should the firm provide?);
- Geographic scope (where should the firm compete geographically?).
Outcome of a firm’s corporate strategy
A large outcome for a firm’s corporate strategy is usually growth.
Firms grow for a number of reasons. These include: increased profits, lowered costs (as larger companies have more economies of scale), increased market power, reduced risk (due to diversified product portfolios), and a more motivated management.
However, businesses can also fail because they grow in the wrong way: too fast, too soon, or based on shaky assumptions about the future. In addition, some firms do not want to grow. For example, small family businesses who currently have convenience and stability might think that growth is not in their best interest.
Core competencies
Core competencies are unique strengths embedded deep within a company. They also allow firms to differentiate their products and create higher value, or have lower costs than competitors.
Core competencies and activities a firm does well should be done in-house. Therefore, according to the resource-based view, a firm’s internally held knowledge and core competencies determine its boundaries.
Economies of scale
When a company’s average cost per unit decreases as the output increases.
Economies of scope
Savings that come from producing two (or more) outputs at less cost than producing each individually, through using the same resources or technology
Transaction costs
These are all the internal and external costs associated with an economic exchange.
Transaction costs show that different institutional arrangements (such as markets vs. firms) have different costs attached to certain resources.
2 types of transaction costs
- External transaction costs are associated with the market and include things like enforcing contracts.
- Internal transaction costs are associated with the firm and include things like costs of recruiting, or paying salaries and benefits. Internal costs tend to increase when organizational size or complexity increases.
Make or buy decisions
Transaction cost economics is a theoretical framework that can be used to explain or predict firm boundaries.
Examining transaction costs enables managers to see if it is cost-effective for the firm to expand boundaries via diversification or vertical integration. In other words, transaction costs help a firm to make ‘make or buy’ decisions.
When the costs of pursuing an activity in-house are less than the costs of transacting for that activity in the market, firms should vertically integrate.
Determining firm boundaries in a way that creates a sustainable competitive advantage, guided by transaction costs, is therefore a key challenge in corporate strategy.
Advantage of organizing economic activity within the firm
Ability to make command-and-control decisions among clear hierarchical lines.
It also allows for the coordination of highly complex tasks and specialized division of labour.
A company can also make transaction-specific investments that are highly valuable within a firm but are of little use to the external market.
An example of a transaction-specific investment would be a special machine that the firm only uses for the products of one buyer. Lastly, firms can create a community of knowledge.
Disadvantages of organizing economic activity within the firm
Disadvantages include administrative costs because of bureaucracy, the low-power of incentives such as hourly wages and salaries, and the principal-agent problem. You likely have heard of the principal-agent problem before.
An agent (or manager) performs activities on behalf of the principal (or owner/shareholder). However, the manager is likely to pursue their own interests.
Because separation of ownership and control is mandatory in public firms, the principal-agent problem is inevitable. Manager goals, such as job security, might therefore interfere with principal goals, like shareholder value.
Advantage of organising economic activity through markets
Firstly, markets have high-powered incentives, which can be powerful motivators.
Entrepreneurs can start their own venture and capture more profit than they would by being employed at a firm. For example, being acquired or doing an IPO (initial public offering) are known as liquidity events that provide enough money for life.
Markets also have increased flexibility - transacting in the market allows comparison of prices.
Disadvantages of organising economic activity through markets
The disadvantages include search costs, as a firm has to look for reliable suppliers. Firms also have to look out for opportunism by other parties - as partner firms may be wholly self-interested.
Another threat is incomplete contracting. All contracts are incomplete because they cannot fully include all future contingencies (and certain aspects like quality are hard to specify). This means that even with a contract, you never have full control over your dealings with the partner.
Another thing to look out for in markets is information asymmetry. This is when one party in a deal has more information than the other. Often, sellers have more information than buyers, which can lead to a crowding out of all “good” products.
Alternatives on the make-or-buy continuum
- Short-term contracts. With these, the firm sends requests for proposals (RFPs) to several companies, which initiates competitive bidding for contracts.
This allows for a longer planning period than individual market transactions and lower prices due to competitive bidding. However, firms have no incentive to make transaction-specific investments since the contracts are short. - Strategic alliances. These are voluntary arrangements between firms involving the sharing of knowledge, resources, and capabilities with the intent to develop processes or products. Alliances can facilitate investments in transaction-specific assets, without the transaction costs associated with owning firms in different stages of the industry value chain.