Week 4 Rules Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Interpretation of the parties agreement F

A

The court has to find the common intention of the party Art. 1156 CC (Art. 1157-1164 CC)

Exception: unclear terms = according to meaning of the contract and usage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interpretation of the parties agreement D

A

The aim of interpretation must be to ascertain the real intention but that interpretation should take place in accordance with fairness and reasonableness taking into account general practice §§ 133, 157 BGB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Interpretation of the parties agreement E

A

reasonable person having all the background knowledge which would reasonably have been available to the parties in the situation which they were at the time of the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Interpretation of the parties agreement NL

A

The court has to find the common intention of the party –> What could they reasonable expected from each other

Case: Hoge Raad

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Contra proferentem rule F

A

Art. 1162, 1602 CC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Contra proferentem rule EU

A

Art. 5 (2) Directive 93/13 on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Contra proferentem rule D

A

§ 305c (2) BGB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Contra proferentem rule UK

A

Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Contra proferentem rule NL

A

Art. &:238 (2) BW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ad hop gap filling PECL

A

Art. 6:102 CC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ad hop gap filling D

A

§ 157 BGB good faith and sound business practice

Case: Swapping doctors 1954

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ad hop gap filling F

A

Art. 1135 CC constructive interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ad hop gap filling NL

A

Art. 6:248 BW reasonableness and fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ad hop gap filling UK

A

Does not regard ad hop gap filling instead terms implied in fact

Case: Liverpool City Council v Irwin (1977)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ad hop gap filling UK

A

Does not regard ad hop gap filling instead terms implied in fact

Case: Liverpool City Council v Irwin (1977)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The principle of good faith D

A

§ 242 BGB

17
Q

The principle of good faith F

A

Art. 1134 (3) CC

18
Q

The principle of good faith NL

A

Art. 6:248 BW

19
Q

The principle of good faith PECL

A

Art. 1:102 (1), 1:201 PECL

20
Q

The principle of good faith E

A

Does not recognize the principle of good faith

21
Q

Unforeseeable circumstances D

A

§ 313 BGB

22
Q

Unforeseeable circumstances NL

A

Art. 6:258 BW

23
Q

Unforeseeable circumstances F

A

Art. 1195 new CC

24
Q

Unforeseeable circumstances E

A

Not accepted

25
Q

Unforeseeable circumstances PECL

A

6:111 PECL

26
Q

Fairness D

A

§ 307 (1) BGB

27
Q

Fairness E

A

Consumer Right Act

28
Q

Fairness F

A

Art. 1171 new CC

29
Q

Fairness NL

A

Art. 6:236, 6:237 BW