Week 4 Questions - 4a Flashcards
Habitat
resources and conditions present in an area that produce occupancy by an organism
habitat selection
the process by which an animal chooses which habitat components to use
habitat preference
- the consequence of the habitat selection process
- resulting in the disproportional use of some resources over others
habitat availability
the accessibility and ability of an individual to obtain physical and biological components of the environment
habitat quality
ability of the environment to provide conditions appropriate for individual and population persistence
Macrohabitat
- large spatial extent that equates to the first level (order) of habitat selection,
- i.e., landscape-scaled features such as seral stages or zones of specific vegetation associations (CWH, ESSF, etc.).
Microhabitat
- finer-scaled habitat features, such as
- home range, specific sites scale, or for specific components within their home ranges; and the resources/microsites level
realized niche
- the observed abundance or distribution of a species
o usually will not include the full range of conditions the species could inhabit,
o It will likely not include the physical conditions where the species does best
Potential niche
the potential abundance or distribution
Why is geographic scale important (1)
Different animals operate at different levels of scale
What are the four levels of scale?
- Geographic range
- Home range
- Specific sites for specific components within home ranges (winter range, breeding grounds)
- Resources/microsite level
What are three concerns about the ‘resource use/habitat use’ concept that needs to be acknowledged and removed?
- temporal variation in resource use is often ignored by biologists/restorationists.
- fundamental concepts should be well defined and understood
- habitat terms are imprecise and ambiguous
How can conspecific attraction benefit restoration goals (1) or possibly significantly bias our understanding of animals’ use of ‘habitat’ (2)?
- can be used to enhance the occupation of restoration sites (choose sites that already have individuals on it)
- but, the absence of individuals does not mean a site is inappropriate for occupancy -> need to understand why they use some habitat and not others
-> critically evaluate baseline information
What should you look for/do to identify potential bias due to conspecific attraction?
- are there inconsistencies in the results of similar studies?
Specifically in observations and study results?
When measuring animal-habitat attributes, what are you measuring?
- sum of the specific resources needed by organisms
i. movement corridors (e.g., migration and dispersal), and
ii. the land animals occupy during breeding and nonbreeding seasons.