Week 4: Performance management & equality Flashcards
Performance management
tracks the organizations performance and ensures that it achieves its objectives (monitors performance, enhances employee engagement)
Performance appraisal
interview between employee and the manager.
When employee perf. is measured:
*review employee performance
*set future goals
*make decisions regarding promotion and development
HPWPs
High Performance Work Practices
Advanced HR practices- people management practices strategic and progressive in the nature.
Ex. Pay for performance, information sharing, team work, performance management.
AMO model
A+M+O–>Ability; motivation; opportunity
By improving AMO:
*training increases ability (does employee have right skills or knowledge?)
*pay performance management incr. motivation (do employees know what is expected from them?)
*teamwork and info sharing opportunities (Do employees operate in an environment conducted to performance?)
Traditional performance management cycle
performance plan—>feedback—>mid-year evaluation—>year-end performance appraisal
How performance management works? (theories)
- The goal-setting theory (Locke-Lathan)
5 Elements of goals- “the star”
1.Clarity
2.Challenge
3.Commitment
4.Feedback
5.Task complexity
*motivation to increase performance
*SMART goals
*Goal impotance
*self-efficacy, ones self-confidence in ability to perform
*feedback mechanism
- Expectancy theory
employee motivation is base on 3 factors:
1) Expectancy- work efforts gives task performance
2)Instrumentality- if my performance reaches target, will I be rewarded?
3)Valence- are this reward good enough for the hard-work? - Equity theory-
inputs (what individual brings- effort, performance)
outputs (factors received in return for inputs-reward, recognition)
—> How equally are employees treated?
Disbalance–>inequality–>worse performance
4.Den Hartog, Bosile, Paauwes model
If PM is aligned with other HRM practices employees perception and attitudes will be affected (motivation, trust, commitment). Consisted messages should be delivered to employee.
Engagement
To extent to which employees demonstrate energy, dedication, immersion in their work.
Improves performance and company’s competitive advantage.
Performance management schemes
1.Rating
2.Ranking
3.Critical incident technique
4. 180 degr. feedback
5. 360 degr. feedback
6.Competency based assessment
Performance management pitfalls
*pressure on workers –> stress, burnout
*threaten self-esteem
*ratings can be irrelevant
*employees having little contol over performance targets can be discounted
*human error
*biases
PM Biases
*contrast effect
*first impression error
*the regency effect- opposite of “first impression error”, only remembering end of appraiser.
*Similar-to-me effect
*Central tendency bias- rating all employees average
*Skewing bias- overly + or - effect on rating
*Attribution bias- understanding incorrect reasons for job not well done
*Stereotyping
How to overcome PM pitfalls?
A) 5 steps:
*identify and agree on the problem
*establish reasons for underperformance
*decide, agree on action
*resource action
*monitor, provide feedback
SMART goals and GROW model
redesign jobs, job rotation
B) 1. Goal setting- SMART goals
2. Coaching- assign coach to employee, GROW model
3. Training- providing training to increase knowledge and skills
4. Role redesign and job rotation
Trends of PM
*Feedback can reduce performance
*Managers despise perf. reviews
*Strength based feedback
*Feedforward interview protocol
*ADOBE disrupted perf. reviews - frequent dialogues and discussions.
Indirect vs direct discrimination
Direct discrimination- discrimination that is obviously contrary to the terms of equality legislation.
Indirect discrimination- seemingly normal provision attached to job acts to exclude a person or group protected under equality legislation.
ex. job req. to be tall—> automatically exclude women.
Positive discrimination vs positive action
Positive discrimination- treatment of a minority group over majority group to fight disadvantages in the market.
Positive action- measures taken aiming to achieve fair and effective equality for member, groups that are disadvantaged. BUT does not seek to discriminate others.
Comparator
A person or group making a claim comparing to demonstrate that they have been treated differently using the comparator or standard.