Week 4 Part 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Where can homo habilis be found?

A

Eastern & Southern africa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many millions of years ago was Homo habilis around?

Point 4 to point 4.

A

2.4 to 1.4 mya

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Did Homo habilis use Acheulian technology?

A

No. They used Oldowan technology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What’s different about homo habilis than its predecessors?

3 points and 2 sub-points

A
  • Larger braincase
  • Shallower face and teeth
    • > Moderately prognathic
  • Smaller teeth than Australopithecus but strong jaws and thick tooth enamel
    • > Designed for hard food chewing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What do we learn from homo habilis butchery patterns and dental microwear? 1 point each.

A
  • Dental microwear suggests flexible and versatile diet

- Butchery patterns suggest use of Oldowan tools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why is it so hard to study Homo rudolfensis? 1 point

A

There is only 1 decent H. rudolfensis fossil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When was Homo rudolfensis around? .9 to .8

A

1.9 - 1.8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What species was originally thought to be Homo habilis?

A

Homo rudolfensis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is different about H. Rudolfensis to its predecessors? 1 point

A
  • Lacked heavy jaw and strong muscle attachments

- > Indicates different diets to Paranthropus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why can’t we be sure that H. Rudolfensis used Oldowan tools?

A
  • No stone tools discovered from same layers as H. Rudolfensis
  • But they do occur during the same time period
    • > But 4 species can be found in the Turkana basin
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Where are Homo ergaster and Homo erectus from? What’s the scientific debate about their differences?

A

Homo ergaster
- African

Homo erectus
- Asian

Some academics believe they’re the same species
- They lump them together as Homo erectus sensu lato

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What species was around 1.9 to 1.4 mya?

A

Homo ergaster

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What species was around 1mya to 143 kyr?

A

Homo erectus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe the anatomy of Homo ergaster. 2 points

A
  • Reduced tooth size

- Relatively strong built hominin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What lithic technologies were Homo ergaster and Homo erectus using?

A

Oldowan and Earliest Acheulian technologies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What adaptations can be seen in the H. Erectus sensu lato specimen ‘Turkana boy’?

A
  • Long slender body in accordance with Bergmann/Allen’s rule

- Long legs and narrow pelvis for fast running

17
Q

How does homo erectus anatomy differ from H. Ergaster? 5 points

A
  • Low cranium
  • Thicker cranial bone
  • Very prominent brow ridges
  • Shortened face and projecting nasal aperture
    • > First appearance of typical human nose with downward facing nostrils
  • Robust post-cranial skeleton
    • > suggesting greater strength than modern humans