Week 4: Functional Morphology Flashcards

1
Q

bonobo

pan paniscus

A
  • live in central africa, south of the zaire river in relatively forested habitat
  • locomotion - knuckle walking on the ground, some climbing and suspensory behaviour, most suspensory of the african apes
  • mostly frugivorous and foliovorous, but both vertebrates and invertebrates are eaten if available
  • social system : fission-fusion, frequent use of sexual behaviour (male-female, f-f, rarely m-m) in social interaction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

comparative morphology of apes

cranium

A
  • hylobates: much smaller than other apes
  • pongo: tall, narrow oval orbits with “supraorbital costae”; small interorbital distance; airorhynchy (upward bent face); teeth with wrinkled, thick enamel
  • gorilla: large supraorbital torus; sagittal and occipital crests in males; sharp crests on teeth and thin enamel
  • pan: smaller and more gracile; supraorbital torus curved; usually no sagittal/occipital crests
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

comparative morphology of apes

orbital region

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

relationship between form and function

functional morphology

A
  • two main factors influencing morphology (phylogeny and function)
  • similarities in morphology can be either homologous (similarity due to common descent) or homoplasies (similarity due to similar function)
  • studies the relationship between function/behaviour and morphology
  • allows to use morphology to reconstruct behaviour of extinct taxa
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

homoplasy

A

independent evolution of streamlined shape

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

functional morphology

teeth

A

main function of teeth
* biting
* chewing
* defense
* social functions (display, tooth comb, etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

functional morphology

biting

A

different foods need to be bitten in different ways
* frugivores: broad incisors
* foliovores: narrow incisors
* massive and strong incisors can indicate that the animal bites hard things - wood to get insects (daubentonia) or sap (some callitrichines)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

functional morphology

chewing

A

different foods need to be chewed in different ways
* frugivores: low, rounded cusps, frequently thick enamel
* foliovores: teeth with sharp longitudinal and transverse crests, thin enamel
* insectivores: teeth with sharp, pointy cusps to pierce chitin
* morphology of course always a compromise between different functional constraints

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

morphological indicators of diet

frugivores

fruit eaters

A
  • broad incisors
  • low rounded molar cusps
  • small long intestine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

morphological indicators of diet

foliovores

leaf eaters

A
  • small incisors
  • well developed molar shearing crests
  • large caecum
  • complex stomach
  • enlarged large intestine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

morphological indicators of diet

gummivores

gum eaters

A
  • stout incisors
  • claws for clinging
  • long caecum
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

morphological indicators of diet

insectivores

insect eaters

A
  • sharp cusps
  • short, simple gut
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

diet and body mass

A
  • smaller primates tend to eat less leaves, but the regression only explains 27.7% of the variance
  • no primates below about 500g body mass is primarily foliovorous
  • smaller primates tend to eat higher quality food, however a lot less variability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

functional morphology

teeth and social behaviour

A
  • canine size correlates well with social system (at least in catarrhines)
  • papio: very strong sexual dimorphism, males with large, dagger-like canines ; polygenous (one male with many females)
  • hylobates: monomorphous canines (same size in males and females) ; monogamous
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

functional morphology

locomotion

A
  • locomotion very closely correlated to postcranial morphology
  • should allow to reconstruct locomotion/positional behaviour easily
  • not so easy when only fragementary material
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

locomotion adaptations

arboreal quadrupedalism

A
  • long tail
  • narrow thorax
  • laterally places scapula
  • long olecranon process
  • deep ulna
  • grasping foot
  • short similar length forearms
17
Q

locomotion adaptations

terrestrial quadrupedalism

A
  • narrow thorax
  • reduced tail
  • short digits
  • restricted shoulder joint
  • posteriorly extended olecranon process
  • robust radius
  • short digits
  • long similar length forelimb and hindlimd
18
Q

locomotion adaptations

vertical clinger and leaper

A
  • long lumbar regions
  • short femoral neck
  • deep femoral condyles
  • long hindlimb
  • narrow tibia
19
Q

locomotion adaptations

suspensory or brachiating locomotion

A
  • long curved fingers
  • rotary wrist joint
  • long forelimbs
  • short olecranon process
  • broad thorax
  • mobile hip joint
  • often no tail
  • short lumbar region
  • dorsally placed scapula
20
Q

locomotion adaptations

bipedalism

A
  • lumbar curve
  • short, broad illium
  • short ischium
  • relatively long hindlimbs
  • short toes
  • adducted great toe
  • affucted knee
  • large head of femur
21
Q

plesiadapiforms

primate-like mammals

A
  • widely distributed in the palaeocene and eocene of north america and europe
  • probably not the ancestors of the primates, as most of them are too specialized in their dentition, could have occupied the ecological niche of the rodents
  • but probably close relatives of the ancestors of the primates
  • about 45 genera with more than 100 species widely accepted, many more described
22
Q

plesiadapiforms

morphology

A
  • no postorbital bar or closure
  • dental formula of 3.1.4.3 in pergatorius, later strongly reduced
  • procumbent incisors, with diastema between canines and incisors
  • many arboreal quadrupeds, with hallux in most cases not opposable
23
Q

main reason

ecological scenarios for the origin of primates

A
  • “arboreal hypothesis”
  • grasping extremities were seen as having value for more secure climbing, and the distinctive primate orbital features were explained as being useful for judging distances in the trees during leaping
24
Q

hypothesis for the origin of the primates

arboreality hypothesis

szalay 1973

A
  • arboreality is plesiomorphic for the archonta (group including primates, scandentia, dermoptera, chiroptera, and plesiadapiformes)
  • derived behaviour of primates: herbivory, acrobatic jumping and climbing
  • jumping from branch to branch, need to be “securely anchored”
25
# hypothesis for the origin of the primates visual predation hypothesis | cartmill
* as not all arboreal mammals show primate characteristics, need other explantation * stereoscopic vision and nails are adaptations to a life style where you identify prey visually and then grip it with your forelimbs
26
# hypothesis for the origin of primates angiosperm hypothesis | sussman
* origin of the primates coincides with the origins of angiosperms * primate specializations to reach flowers, fruits and nectar on thin branches * does not really explain stereoscopic vision * visual predation is rare in recent primates (tarsiers, some strepsirhines) * our visual system convergent with cats, but most similar to megachiroptera (fruit bats)
27
# hypotheses for the origin of the primates locomotion hypothesis | crompton
* main selection pressure is locomotion * stereoscopic vision is important when you are jumping on small branches, it allows you to judge distances * jumping primarly as predator avoidance
28
# ecological scenarios for the origin of primates some problems
* visual predation: few primates are visual predators. tarsiers can capture prey with eyes closed, and lorises and mouse lemurs use scent to find their prey * in general, modern analogies can be midleading
29
# euprimates the first "real" primates adapoids and omomyoids
* from the early eocene on * almost worldwide (with the exception of austronesia, south america and antartica) * disapear almost completely with the "grande coupure" at the end of the eocene, the sivaladapinae survive in SE asia until the late miocene * hundreds of species
30
# the first real primates adapoids
* medium sized (most 700-1000g) * dental formula 2.1.4.3 in some reduced * small, vertical lower incisors * canines > incisors, in some taxa sexually dimorph * molars with long shearing crests
31
# the first real primates omomyoids
* very frequent in north america, less so in europe * smaller than adapoids * dental formula 2.1.4.3 in all later species reduced * small canines, molars with pointy cusps * short snout, large eyes
32
ida
* originally described as a "missing link" between "prosimians" and anthropoids * a much more likely interpretation is that she's actually an adapoid, likely a cercamoniine