Week 4 - Ethics Flashcards

1
Q

Tri council policy statement

A

framework for ethical research involving human participants
in canada

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

3 federal agencies

A

Canadian institues of health research
o Natural sciences and engineering research council of canada
o Social sciences and humanities research council of canada

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

core ethical principles

A
  • Respect for persons
    o Acknowledge intrinsic value and autonomy of individuals
    o Emphasize importance of informed consent and protecting vulnerable
    populations
  • Concern for human welfare
    o Overall quality of life
    o Consider health, housing, employment, community involvement
  • Justice
    o Fairness and equity in research
    o Benefits and burdens of research are distributed justly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dissemination

A

openly share results unless it risks participant safety, provide
feedback when possible, acknowledge limitations, avoid data distortion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Indigenous research

A

Researchers and indigenous partners must navigate individual vs collective interests

importance of elders, knowledge keepers, indigenous governance structures

exploitative research practices have led to apprehension in indigenous
communities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

OCAP principles

A

ownership, control, access, possession – guides ethical research
practices, highlight need for reflection on academic freedom, engagement with future
generations, spiritual values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Open mindset

A

Enter research without preconceived notions, avoid expecting pariticpants to confirm your assumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Questioning technique

A

Favour “how” questions over “why” questions – encourage contextual
discussions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Acknowledge constraints

A

Be aware of factors that may limit a participants autonomy, such as fear of
authority or lack of understanding, recognize social and personal contexts that may influence wilingness to share

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Contextual approaches

A

Adapt research methods to a specific community and culture, show respect for participants values and norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Descriptive rather than remedial

A

Avoid a fix it mentality, focus on observing and understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Authentic relationships

A

o Treat participants as partners rather than subjects
o Build genuine relationships to help dispel bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Gaining access to the field

A
  • Community leaders as gatekeepers – getting permission to study the group

o Honestly state research intenti9ons
- Corporate research complexity
o Gaining access to corporations may involve navigating legal departments,
companies may dictate terminology and research focus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Spending time in the field

A

Researcher presence – demeanor and visibility can vary, be aware of how presence impacts the community

Building relationships – familiarity with community can foster openness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ethical considerations in the field

A

Friendships – genuine friendships can complicate ethical responsibilities

Intimate relationships – complex ethical challenges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Leaving the field

A

Done respectfully, maintain integrity of relationships, consider informing
participants of findings to show appreciation

Transition to a frienship role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Covert field research

A

Observing without revealing ones identity

Justified when it aims to protect individuals or groups from harm

expose injustices or
improve conditions

by police, governments, is opposed as it is seen as an intrusion

truly anonymous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Interviewing and transcribing

A

Participants may want to be anonymous, so they don’t want to sign forms
- Verbal consent
o Explains the same details as written consent, does not require a signature

19
Q

Presentism

A

researchers must avoid judging historical documents by modern standards

20
Q

Collaborative analysis

A

can be used to help mitigate viewpoints

21
Q

Analyzing data

A

Remain true to the data, do not force it to fit into preconceived theories

22
Q

Acting ethically in the digital age

A

Accessibility – information on publicly accessible web pages may be treated like printed
materials in magazines

  • Anonymity and informed consent – social media challenges traditional commitments to
    anonymity, need for informed consent is questioned
23
Q

Ethical reflection in writing

A

Avoid jargon, use the active voice, neutral tone, allow reader interpretation, avoid influencing readers opinions, be consistent

24
Q

Two dimensions of ethics

A
  • Procedural ethics – formal ethical guidelines, typically established through research
    ethics board
  • Ethics in practice – day to day ethical decisions that arise as researchers engage in the
    field
25
Q

Reflexivity as an ethical tool

A

Reflexivity – researchers relfecting on their actions, decisions, and impact throughout the
research process
- Allows researchers to examine their own role, biases, and ethical considerations in
conducting research
- supplements limitations of procedural ethics

26
Q

procedural ethics

A

seen as a formality
ethics committee may be unfamiliar or antagonistic toward qualitative methods
ethical committees cannot see all unexpected ethical challenges. Researchers may
gloss over potential risks

27
Q

ethics in practice

A

unanticipated situations arise, demanding quick and thoughtful responses

react to sensitive disclosures or participant vulnerabilities
o breaching confidentiality to avoid harm

28
Q

microethics

A

address issue between high level bioethical debates and everyday issues faced in clinical practice

ethical complexities in everyday interactions

relationship and interactions between
researchers and participants, for respondng to sensitive disclosures

29
Q

frustration with procedural ethics

A

biomedical models may not fit research needs, ethics applications are formal and
bureaucratic

30
Q

history of procedural ethics

A

after WWII with the Nuremberg code, created to protect research participants
after atrocities committed by Nazi doctors

31
Q

value of procedural ethics

A

protects basic rights and safety of participants

provides a checklist for researchers, prompting them to consider issues like
confidentiality, consent, risks, benefits

32
Q

limitations of procedural ethics

A

not much guidance in dealing with real life situations faced in qualitative research

33
Q

knowledge construction

A

research is a collaboration between researchers and participants
o process requires scrutiny, reflection, and interrogation of how data is gathered

34
Q

defining reflexivity

A

continuously examine their actions, roles, and research process with the same
critical scrutiny as the data itself
o actively construct interpretations and critically question how those interpretations
come about

35
Q

two-step process

A

process: first, objectively observing the research subject, and second,
reflecting on that observation itself

36
Q

RESEARCH ETHICS

A

principles - guide interactions w/ research participants & our commitment to safeguard their
rights & interests

37
Q

The Most Basic Ethical Dilemma

A
  • Balancing 2 important & sometimes conflicting responsibilities
38
Q

confidentiality

A

do not disclose information that identifies any one participant to anyone else

38
Q

Protecting confidentiality

A

informed consent, confidentiality forms, electronic or handwritten codes, assign pseudonyms

38
Q

Primary obligation

A

do no harm

39
Q

anonymity

A

protecting identity of participants
individuals cannot be identified

40
Q

individual conflict of interest

A

interests of researcher dont coincide with interests of participants

41
Q

institutional conflict of interest

A

interests of institution conflict with ethical obligations

42
Q

all ethical research requires…

A

systematic data gathering
transparency and accuracy
collection of original data
fair and accurate data representation