Week 4 - English School and Constructivism Flashcards
What is the English School and what is it also known as?
The English School is also known as the International Society and it is a product of the 1970s and 1980s.
The aim of it is to try and find a middle way between realism and liberalism and therefore it was a product of middle power actors
What principles of Realism are reflected in the English School?
- States are central actors
- Power is important
- There is no international government and therefore a strong belief in anarchy
What principles of Idealism are reflected in the English School?
- Norms and values matter
- International law matters
- Human rights matter
How does the English School reject Realism?
- There are other actors that are equally as important as the States
- There are more forms of power than State power
- Not pure anarchy but it is an anarchical society
How does English School reject Liberalism?
- Cannot rely on laws to fully structure the international system and laws can only go so far
- Power in the realist sense is a reality - strong states
- International system is a mix of power, norms, rules
According to the English School, what are the three levels of the International System?
International System, International Society and World Community
Outline the International System
This is where the realm of power politics is played. In this system, (1) there are interactions between actors but no shared rules, purposes or interests and (2) interactions take place due to practical contracts and (3) without an international system, there cannot be any International Society
Outline the International Society
Shared norms and identities and therein a common interest in maintaining order. It views a society of states, peaceful cooperation and hope without delusion, but focuses on the idea that we have to concentrate on the norms that contribute to peace
Outline the World Community
Very similar values around the world which focuses on the idea of universalist cosmopolitanism. Individuals rather than states are the key actors and therefore there are shared interests and values which link all parts of the human community and transcending the States.
How can order be achieved within the International System, despite ideological differences?
Order can be achieved within the International System even if all the States do not have the same ideology or conception of justice and this is because there is a desire to maintain order and a basic respect and recognition for each other
Why are some States ‘out’ of the pluralistic International System?
What problems does this cause?
Despite interactions, neither side believe themselves to be part of the same society and this can be due to the idea that some states may not share basic values at all = some states are part of the system but not part of the society.
This has severe implications i.e. they are at odds with the majority of the other states forming the International System and this means that they cannot benefit from the advantages of the International System. An example of this is North Korea who have limited interactions, no respects for basic human rights and a few shared values / no perception of common belonging and this can mean that they will be at odds with the International Society - then the IS can be under permanent threat.
What is the Realist critique of the English School?
(1) There is no evidence that norms are determinants of state policy or behaviour, even the sovereignty norm
(2) Persistence of war: sovereignty is insufficient to deter predatory states
(3) Evidence of norms is weak and there is no such thing as an international society - used by weak states to comfort themselves
What is the Liberalist critique of the English School
They should pay more attention to domestic policies and they cannot combine contradictory positions of state power and norms as this mixes both realism and liberalism.
Another critique is focused on the idea that the International Society focuses on order rather than justice - they did this because at the time of prominence of the theory, nuclear proliferation was the biggest worry and it was believed that we needed to focus on order in an attempt to keep us alive
What is the Critical Theory critique of the English School
Looks to the idea that the theory legitimises the Westphalian system of states, which holds society stagnant and doesn’t allow them to develop
What is Constructivism?
It stresses the socially constructed character of international relations and claims that political phenomenon are historically and socially contingent and therefore are not an inevitable consequences of human nature.