WEEK 4 - Chapter 6: Supply, Demand and Government Policies Flashcards
Control on prices.
To see how price controls affect market outcomes, let’s look once again at the market for ice-cream. As we saw in chapter 4, if ice-cream is sold in a competitive market free of government regulation, the price of ice-cream adjusts to balance supply and demand – at the equilibrium price, the quantity of ice-cream that buyers want to buy exactly equals the quantity that sellers want to sell. To be concrete, suppose the equilibrium price is $3 per ice-cream.
Some people may not be happy with the outcome of this free-market process. Suppose the Australian Association of Ice-cream Eaters complains that the $3 price is too high for everyone to enjoy an ice-cream a day (their recommended daily allowance). Meanwhile, the National Organisation of Ice-cream Makers complains that the $3 price – the result of ‘cutthroat competition’–is depressing the incomes of its members.
Each of these groups lobbies the government to pass laws that alter the market outcome by directly controlling prices.
Because buyers of any good always want a lower price and sellers want a higher price, the interests of the two groups conflict. If the Ice-cream Eaters are successful in their lobbying, the government imposes a legal maximum on the price at which ice-cream can be sold, called a price ceiling. If the Ice-cream Makers are successful, the government imposes a legal minimum on the price, called a price floor. Let us consider the effects of these policies in turn.
What is a price ceiling?
A legal maximum on the price at which a good can be sold.
Eg. Rent controls, home loan interest rates
Effects: . Lost consumer surplus . Lost producer surplus . Lower quantity traded . Less consumed . Some producer surplus is transferred . Most importantly, tends to adversely affect the very people, it is meant to protect! - unintended consequence
What is a price floor?
A legal minimum on the price at which a good can be sold.
There will be surplus at the price set by the price floor, because the price is preferred by suppliers, but not by consumers.
Eg. Wool, wheat and butter.
Effects: . Lost consumer surplus . Lost producer surplus . Lower quantity traded . Less consumed . Some producer surplus is transferred . Most importantly, tends to adversely affect the very it is meant to protect! - unintended consequence
How price floors affect market outcomes?
2 outcomes:
When the government imposes a price floor on the ice-cream market, two outcomes are possible. If the government imposes a price floor of $2 per ice-cream when the equilibrium price is $3, we obtain the outcome in panel (a) of Figure 6.4.
In this case, because the equilibrium price is above the floor, the price floor is not binding. Market forces naturally move the economy to the equilibrium and the price floor has no effect.
Panel (b) of Figure 6.4 shows what happens when the government imposes a price floor of $4 per ice-cream. In this case, because the equilibrium price of $3 is below the floor, the price floor is a binding constraint on the market. The forces of supply and demand tend to move the price towards the equilibrium price, but when the market price hits the floor, it can fall no further. The market price equals the price floor. At this floor, the quantity of ice-cream supplied (120 ice- creams) exceeds the quantity demanded (80). Some people who want to sell ice-cream at the going price are unable to. Thus, a binding price floor causes a surplus.
What about the minimum wage?
Conventional view is that price floor analysis applies to minimum wages - minimum wage should result in a decrease in employment.
This view has been challenged - little evidence on support of this view: minimum wage appears to have no effect on employment.
Perhaps the standard price floor model does not work well in labour markets.
Evaluating price controls.
P. 130
What is tax incidence?
The study of who bears the burden of taxation.
Free Vs Regulated Markets.
. Price ceiling . Price floors . Taxes . Tariffs and subsidies . Rationing/quotas . Bans
Essentially dealing with trade-off between equity and efficiency.
Rent controls.
Short run effects on owners:
. Don’t make it available
. Use discrimination
. Illegal activities
Long run effect on owners:
. Less investment on repairs and renovations
. Sell and move into commercial property, or other investments
Price controls on pharmaceutical drugs.
. Reduces revenue to drug companies
. Less incentive to engage in research and development
- slower pace of innovation
- takes longer for new drugs to be created
- lives lost, greater pain and suffering, etc.
Other examples of price controls.
France: a prosperous agricultural nation. However, price controls imposed during the French Revolution in 1973 created widespread food shortages.
Zimbabwe: price controls and imprisoned people who did not comply - food disappears from shop shelves.
Venezuela: food price controls have led to major food crisis.
Rationing (quotas).
Supply line begins as normal and then becomes vertical.
Effects of Rationing/
– Transfers surplus from producers to consumers
– Efficiency loss
– Some consumers who value the good highly might miss out and suffer huge surplus loss (Can lead to black markets)
– Some consumers who do not value the good are encouraged to consume it
Bans.
. Some markets are illegal –Heroin, Marijuana etc –Prostitution –Blood –Kidneys Black Markets form
Black markets.
Price controls often force trade underground
• Exchange becomes illegal but some people resort to crime
• Fuels organised crime, corrupts governments
Cost of bans.
• 16,151 Australians were waiting for a life-saving transplant and only 308 donations were made last year (Transplant Australia)
• Constant shortage of blood
–No market in blood, so price can’t eliminate the shortage
• Currently rely on altruism but $ might be provide incentive to increase supply