Week 4 Flashcards
Difference between screening and diagnostics?
- Diagnostics = use of tests to ascertain if indiv WITH a symptom has the condition
- Screening = testing for indiv who do NOT have symptoms (ex: routine colonoscopy)
Surveillance =
constant watching or monitoring of disesases to assess patterns and quickly identify events that do not fin in the pattern. (who is getting the disease and where?)
What might a spike incidence (detected through surveillance) indicate?
beg of epidemic
How might surveillance techniques be applied to individuals with infectious diseases? Genetically based?
o For infectious disease, this may include monitoring of individuals who already have the disease + their contacts, as well as general pop
o If genetically based, may track through extended family relationships
What is association?
• = reasonable evidence that a connection exists between a stress or environmental factor + disease.
o May be first noticed through observation, them CHN or epidemiologist examine the data to see if the relationship is weak or strong. If strong, do more extensive examination.
What is a causal relationship?
• = when a relationship or association has been confirmed beyond doubt. There is a definitie, statistical, cause-and-effect relationship
T/F It was harder to find causal relationships when most diseases were infectious
F - is harder now with chronic disease as are multifactorial
What is necessary + what is sufficient r/t causation:
o If cause is “necessary” = that stressor must be present before given effect can occur
o If case is “sufficient” = the amount of exposure required to result in the disease (*this sounds a little different than research class?)
What is a web of causation?
diagram illustrating how various relationships among the many causes or influences intersect in a particular health outcomes
What are the criteria for causation? (7)
1) Temporal relationship = person does not get the disease until after exposure
2) Strength of assoc – exposure to specific stress or cause is most likely to bring about the disease
3) Dose-response: person who are most exposed get the most ill
4) Specificity: cause is linked to a specific disease (one bacteria leads to the specified disease)
5) Consistency: everyone who eats the contaminated food gets ill
6) Biologic plausibility: consistent with biologic/medical knowledge that is known
7) Experimental replication – several studies show same results
Two measures of morbidity?
incidence or prevalence
Why are morbidity rates important?
give a picture of the pop and a disease or health challenge over time, suggesting questions about the susceptibility of the pop + the effectiveness of either HP or treatment strategies
Prevalence =
• number of people in a w disease in given pop at a point in time / # of total pop in that same time
If a diseae is short-lived, is prevalence very useful?
When might it be useful in thsi regard?
• If disease is short lived, prev doesn’t reveal much, but may use this in epidemic situations to plan for exta staff (ex: H1N1)
How does the inc + prev compare if the disease is short lived and results in few deaths
the incidence and prev are very similar