Week 3: Genetics and Evolution Flashcards
Nature-Nurture Question, Evolutionary Theories in Psych, Epigenetics in Psych
Nature-Nuture as a “debate”
So much controversy over this question - we are so concerned w nature/nurture because our very sense of moral character seems to depend on it
Born with certain characteristics while others are acquired
How do you set up an experiment to answer this question?
In typical human families, children’s biological parents raise them, so it’s difficult to know whether children act like their parents due to genetic (nature) or environmental (nurture) reasons
We see real-world examples of nature/nurture at work in the human sphere, though they only provide partial answers to our many questions
Behavioural Genetics
Empirical science of how genes & environments combine to generate behaviour
Easiest opportunity to observe this is the adoption study
Adoption Study
Behaviour genetic research method that involves comparison of adopted children to their adoptive and biological parents
Twin Studies
Behaviour genetic research method that involves comparison of the similarity of identical (monozygotic; MZ) and fraternal (dizygotic; DZ) twins
Identical - Monozygotic; results from a single zygote (fertilized egg) and have same DNA; clones
Fraternal - Dizygotic; develops from two zygotes and share 50% of DNA; ordinary siblings who happen to have been born at the same time
Compare similarity of MZ and DZ pairs to analyze nature/nurture
Quantitative Genetics
Scientific & mathematical methods for inferring genetic & environmental processes based on the degree of genetic and environmental similarity among organisms
scientific discipline in which similarities among individuals are analyzed based on how biologically related they are
Twin/adoption studies are two instances of a much broader class of methods for observing nature/nurture called quantitative genetics
Heritability coefficient
An easily misinterpreted statistical construct that purports to measure the role of genetics in the explanation of differences among individual
Varying from 0-1, meant to provide a single measure of genetics’ influence of a trait; measures how strongly differences among individuals are related to differences among their genes
deceptively difficult to interpret
You can’t leave… out of the equation
you can’t leave GENES out of the equation
Best predictors of an adopted child’s personaility/mental health are found in BIO parents they have never met, rather than the adoptive parents who raised them - presents a significant challenge to purely environmental explanations of personality or psychopathology
*No behavioural traits are completely inherited, can’t leave environment out all together
“Correlation doesn’t equal causation” - genetic AS WELL AS environmental
Behaviorism
middle of 20th century, psych was dominated by doctrine of behaviourism - behaviour could only be explained in terms of environmental factors; neither behaviourism nor psychoanalysis is in compatible w genetic influences on behaviour, neither Freud/skinner was naive abt importance of organic processes in behaviour
Back in the day, it was widely though children’s personalities were shaped entirely by imitating their parents’ behaviour and that schizophrenia was caused by certain kinds of “pathological mothering”
More-to-less genetic traits
Inability to organize traits from more to less genetic; everything has turned out to be at least SOMEWHAT heritable, yet nothing ABSOLUTELY heritable; not much consistency as to which traits are more heritable than others
Problem: heritability coefficient (and the whole quantitative structure that underlies it) doesn’t match up w our nature/nurture intuitions
Genes and environment are crucial to EVERY trait; the cause of a given trait depends not only on the trait itself, but also on the differences int hat trait between members of the group being studied
The heritability of a trait is not simply a property of that trait, but a property of the trait in a particular context of relevant genes/environmental factors
The science of nature and nurture has demonstrated that genetic differences among people are vital to human moral equality, freedom, and self-determination, not opposed to them
Evolution
Change over time; certain traits and behaviours developing over time because they are advantageous to our survival
Natural Selection
Differential reproductive success as a consequence of differences in heritable attributes
Reproductive success, not survival success, is the engine of evolution by natural selection
In order for our genes to endure over time we have inherited adaptive, psychological processes designed to ensure success
Adaptations
Evolved solutions to problems that historically contributed to reproductive success
We can think of organisms as having two large classes of adaptations that evolved over time to increase our reproductive success
- Survival adaptations - mechanisms that helped our ancestors handle the “hostile forces of nature”; sweat glands, shivering mechanisms, craving for fats/sugaras, fear to stay safe
- Reproductive adaptations - help us compete for mates; described in evolutionary theory proposed by Charles Darwin - sexual selection theory
Sexual Selection Theory
The evolution of characteristics because of the mating advantage they give organisms
Darwin noticed there were many traits/behaviours of organisms that couldn’t be explained by survival selection
two processes:
1. Intrasexual competition - members of one sex compete against each other, winner gets to mate w a member of the opposite sex; more attractive to potential maters increasing reproductive success; whatever qualities lead to success in intrasexual competition are then passed on w greater frequency due to association w greater mating success
- Intersexual selection - members of one sex are attracted to certain qualities in mates (brilliant plumage, signs of good health, intelligence); desire qualities get passed on in greater numbers, simply bc their possessors mate more often
Intrasexual v. Intersexual Competition
Intra - Process of sexual selection by which members of one sex compete w each other, and the victors gain preferential mating access to members of the opposite sex
Inter - process of sexual selection by which evolution occurs as a consequence of the mate preferences of one sex exerting selection pressure on members of the opposite sex
Mutual Mate Choice
Unlike other animals, where one sex has dominant control over mate choice, humans have mutual mate choice
Both women and men typically have a say in choosing their mates; both value qualities such as kindness, intelligence, dependability that are beneficial to long term relationships - qualities that make good partners/parents