Week 3: Basic Design 2 - Simple Experiments That Have 1 Independent Variable Flashcards
How many levels do you need for a TRUE EXPERIMENT?
A: 1
B: 2
C: 3+
B: 2
We need a minimum of 2 levels. 3 or more is better because then we can determine a non-linear/functional relationship.
Can you use either a quantitative or a qualitative independent variable?
A: Yes
B: No
A: Yes
EXAMPLE:
Research Question: Does our environment influence our well-being?
Hypothesis: A cluttered environment causes stress
Qualitative: Dirty coffee cups vs. Dirty food plates
Quantitative: Manipulate # of dirty dishes (How many levels? What range will we use?)
What are the three different measures we can use for the dependent variable?
A: Self-report, behavioral, and physiological
B:
C:
A: Self-report, behavioral, and physiological
> Self-report (E.g., rate how stressed you feel)
> Behavioral (E.g., observe stress behaviors like fidgeting, nail-biting, etc.)
> Physiological (E.g., heart rate, cortisol)
What are the four different scales of measurement we can use?
A:
B: Nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio
C:
B: Nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio
Nominal:
> Categorical
> E.g., categorize participants as “Stressed” or “Not Stressed”
Ordinal:
> Categorical
> E.g., not stressed, a little stressed, somewhat stressed, very stressed
Interval:
> Numerical
> E.g., rate level of stress on a scale of 1 (not stressed) to 50 (extremely stressed)
Ratio:
> Numerical
> E.g., count the number of stress behaviors
What is test-retest reliability?
A:
B:
C: Test-retest reliability means that if they test a participant and then test them again, they want to make sure they are getting the same kind of response. In other words, if they test someone’s stress level with some kind of instrument, they should get a similar result every time they test that participant.
C: Test-retest reliability means that if they test a participant and then test them again, they want to make sure they are getting the same kind of response. In other words, if they test someone’s stress level with some kind of instrument, they should get a similar result every time they test that participant.
> Ensure any instruments/measures you use are dependable
> E.g., stress survey, instrument used to test participant heart rate
What is interrater reliability?
A: Interrater reliability means that if they have multiple judges assessing behaviors, they want to make sure the judges come to similar conclusions about the participants. So if they have different people rating how stressed a participant seems based on their behaviors, they want the ratings to be consistent between the different judges.
B:
C:
A: Interrater reliability means that if they have multiple judges assessing behaviors, they want to make sure the judges come to similar conclusions about the participants. So if they have different people rating how stressed a participant seems based on their behaviors, they want the ratings to be consistent between the different judges.
> Ensure ratings are consistent, no matter which particular person is making them
> E.g., judges ratings of participant stress levels
What is construct validity?
A:
B:
C: Construct validity asks whether the operational definitions chosen are appropriate. For example, if they define “clutter” operationally as having more than 10 dirty dishes in a room, construct validity would ask if having dirty dishes actually measures the construct of clutter. It also asks if their measure of stress (e.g. blood pressure) actually measures the construct of stress.
C: Construct validity asks whether the operational definitions chosen are appropriate. For example, if they define “clutter” operationally as having more than 10 dirty dishes in a room, construct validity would ask if having dirty dishes actually measures the construct of clutter. It also asks if their measure of stress (e.g. blood pressure) actually measures the construct of stress.
Clutter → dirty dishes appropriate?
Stress → ???
What is external validity?
A:
B: External validity asks whether the study can be generalized beyond the materials and participants used in the study. It questions whether the results from a laboratory study, for example, can be generalized to the real world.
C:
B: External validity asks whether the study can be generalized beyond the materials and participants used in the study. It questions whether the results from a laboratory study, for example, can be generalized to the real world.
When defining variables and population, those choices will determine how widely you can generalize results.
What is internal validity?
A: Internal validity asks whether, in a study with an independent variable and dependent variable if the differences in the dependent variable can actually be attributed to the manipulation of the independent variable. In other words, it asks if we can conclude that changes in the independent variable caused the changes in the dependent variable.
B:
C:
A: Internal validity asks whether, in a study with an independent variable and dependent variable if the differences in the dependent variable can actually be attributed to the manipulation of the independent variable. In other words, it asks if we can conclude that changes in the independent variable caused the changes in the dependent variable.
Does a cluttered environment (IV) cause stress (DV)
What is an extraneous variable?
A:
B:
C: Extraneous variables are absolutely anything in the study that is not the independent variable and is not the dependent variable. Everything that is not the independent or dependent variable is considered an extraneous variable.
C: Extraneous variables are absolutely anything in the study that is not the independent variable and is not the dependent variable. Everything that is not the independent or dependent variable is considered an extraneous variable.
EXAMPLE:
> Rat running speed study
> The age of the rats, whether they were hungry, their gender, where they were from (e.g. Ohio vs Wyoming), and how they were handled.
> Anything not related to the independent variable (drug vs placebo) or dependent variable (running speed) could be considered an extraneous variable.
What is a confounding variable?
A:
B:
C: A confounding variable is a type of extraneous variable that will cause havoc to the study’s internal validity. A confounding variable is an extraneous variable where the level of the variable systematically changes across levels of the independent variable. This is very bad for internal validity because it means the confounding variable is entangled with the independent variable, making it impossible to determine if outcomes are due to the independent variable or the confounding variable.
C: A confounding variable is a type of extraneous variable that will cause havoc to the study’s internal validity. A confounding variable is an extraneous variable where the level of the variable systematically changes across levels of the independent variable. This is very bad for internal validity because it means the confounding variable is entangled with the independent variable, making it impossible to determine if outcomes are due to the independent variable or the confounding variable.
EXAMPLE:
In the study looking at whether the color of text impacts reading speed, using different story topics (e.g. about a dog, cat, or cow) for each color condition would create a confounding variable. This is because the story topic would systematically vary depending on the color condition, making it impossible to tell if any differences were due to color or the topic.
What are three ways to control an extraneous variable?
A: Keep it constant, vary it randomly, counterbalance it across conditions
B:
C:
A: Keep it constant, vary it randomly, counterbalance it across conditions
What does “keep it constant” mean?
A:
B: One way to control an extraneous variable is to keep it constant, meaning no matter what condition a participant is assigned to, they will be exposed to the same level of the extraneous variable. As an example, in the rat running speed study, they could keep the age of the rats constant by only using rats that are 10 months old in both conditions.
C:
B: One way to control an extraneous variable is to keep it constant, meaning no matter what condition a participant is assigned to, they will be exposed to the same level of the extraneous variable. As an example, in the rat running speed study, they could keep the age of the rats constant by only using rats that are 10 months old in both conditions.
> The same value or level is maintained for all conditions
EXAMPLE:
> Violent TV study
> Manipulate the quantity of Violent TV (0, 5, 10 hours)
> Keep constant TYPE OF VIOLENT TV (E.g., only Tom and Jerry cartoons)
What does “vary it randomly” mean?
A:
B: Another way to control an extraneous variable is to allow it to vary randomly. For example, in the rat study, they could randomly assign rats of varying ages between 2-10 months to the different conditions. This allows the extraneous variable to randomly vary across conditions.
C:
B: Another way to control an extraneous variable is to allow it to vary randomly. For example, in the rat study, they could randomly assign rats of varying ages between 2-10 months to the different conditions. This allows the extraneous variable to randomly vary across conditions.
> Level or value is randomly distributed across participants
> Most common way of dealing with an extraneous variable
> By randomly assigning participants to conditions we assume participant traits (e.g., talents, height, intelligence, hobbies) are more or less distributed across conditions.
What does “counterbalance it across conditions” mean?
A: The third way to control an extraneous variable is to counterbalance it across conditions. This means making sure the extraneous variable, or its effects, are balanced or distributed equally across the different conditions. For example, in the rat study, they could counterbalance age by ensuring an equal number of young and old rats are assigned to each condition.
B:
C:
A: The third way to control an extraneous variable is to counterbalance it across conditions. This means making sure the extraneous variable, or its effects, are balanced or distributed equally across the different conditions. For example, in the rat study, they could counterbalance age by ensuring an equal number of young and old rats are assigned to each condition.
> COUNTER the effect of an EV by BALANCING it across
conditions
> E.g. Height of participants
What does it mean when something varies systematically?
A:
B:
C: When an extraneous variable varies systematically across levels of the independent variable, it is very bad for internal validity. A systematic variation means the extraneous variable changes predictably depending on the level of the independent variable being tested. For example, if all the young rats were in one condition and all the old rats in another, their age would be varying systematically with the condition. This makes the extraneous variable difficult to disentangle from the independent variable.
C: When an extraneous variable varies systematically across levels of the independent variable, it is very bad for internal validity. A systematic variation means the extraneous variable changes predictably depending on the level of the independent variable being tested. For example, if all the young rats were in one condition and all the old rats in another, their age would be varying systematically with the condition. This makes the extraneous variable difficult to disentangle from the independent variable.
RAT STUDY SOLUTIONS:
> If you’re going to “vary randomly” you could still let age vary randomly but use many more participants
in each condition.
> If you’re going to “counterbalance” it’s more work-intensive than the other options BUT If we are really worried about age, counterbalancing is the best way to ensure equality across conditions. This would look like having a 2-month-old in both “no drug” and “drug” and so on with all the different ages between 2-10 months.
What is a within-subjects design?
A:
B:
C: A within-subjects design means that each participant is exposed to all conditions of the study. So every participant experiences all levels of the independent variable, rather than different participants being assigned to different levels as in a between-subjects design.
C: A within-subjects design means that each participant is exposed to all conditions of the study. So every participant experiences all levels of the independent variable, rather than different participants being assigned to different levels as in a between-subjects design.
> All participants experience all levels of the Independent Variable
> The Stroop Experiment from your lab used this design
> E.g., all rats would take part in both levels of the Independent Variable (Placebo, Drug)
> Crossing over from one IV level to the other - everyone competes with themselves - the participant gets the placebo and the drug and their reaction is measured
PROS:
> Strongest test of the hypothesis
> Each participant serves as their own control
> Need fewer participants
> Less costly
CONS:
> Possible order effects
> More complex design for controlling extraneous
variables
What is a between-subjects design?
A:
B: A between-subjects design means that each participant is only exposed to a single level of the independent variable. So different participants are assigned to each level or condition, rather than one participant experiencing all levels as in a within-subjects design.
C:
B: A between-subjects design means that each participant is only exposed to a single level of the independent variable. So different participants are assigned to each level or condition, rather than one participant experiencing all levels as in a within-subjects design.
> Participants experience only one level of the Independent Variable
> The Violent TV/Aggression study; kids watched either 0, 5, or 10 hours
> E.g., all rats would take part in only one level of the Independent Variable (Placebo, Drug)
> There is NO crossover from one IV level to the other - everyone is competing with other participants - the participant either gets only the placebo or only the drug and their reaction is measured to whichever level they got and compared to everyone else
PROS:
> No concern about order effects
> Easier to design
CONS:
> Less powerful test of hypothesis
> More participants
> More costly
> No guarantee that groups are truly equivalent