Week 3 and Week 4 Flashcards
What is a short model?
We replace some variables with a new variable, ex. Beta:2X2 + U becomes V and replace beta for alpha
if the short model satisfies the exogeneity assumption E[V | X1] = 0 then
αˆ_1 ≈ α_1 = β_1
What 2 condition can confirm that cov(X1, V ) = 0
1 of these has to hold:
• the variable X2 does not affect the outcome, β2 = 0,
• the regressors X1 and X2 are uncorrelated, cov(X1, X2) = 0.
What is omitted variable bias /OV bias and how does the formula look?
The term (cov(X1,X2)/var(X1))β2 is called the omitted variable bias of αˆ1.
This bias indicates by how much the estimator αˆ1 deviates systematically from its estimand β1.
When is OV bias not zero?
The bias is different from zero if
• the variable X2 does affects the outcome, β2≠ 0 and
• the regressors X1 and X2 are correlated, cov(X1, X2)≠ 0.
Can we reduce OV bias by adding more regressors?
No.
When dealing with measurement error what is omitted variable bias called?
(cov(X1∗, W )/var(X1∗))β2 is called the attenuation bias.
What does it mean if αˆ1 is biased toward zero.
Therefore, in large samples, αˆ1 is a scaled-down version of the true effect β1, it has the same sign but is smaller in absolute value. In other words, αˆ1 estimates a value that is closer to zero than the true effect. We say that αˆ1 is biased toward zero.
if the variance of the measurement error is small relative to the variance of X1 the attenuation factor will be …
close to 1 and the attenuation bias will be small.
- Conversely, if the variance of the measurement error is large relative to the variance of X1 the attenuation factor will be close to 0 and the attenuation bias will be large.
-In particular, we may estimate the effect of X1 to be close to zero even if its true effect is substantially different from zero.
What does exogeneity mean?
That we can’t predict U from the regressors.
Transforming a long model to a short model might create an issue
Endogeneity, we can then predict U from ex. B2
Is the correlation (covariance) never zero in the short model.
It is never zero.
If we have a positive B1, Can a VERY negative OV-bias flip the sign of B^1?
Yes. A very negative can do that.
classical measurement error assumptions
- E[w]=0 measures correctly on average
- W is independent of X1 and U, no systematic MISmeasurement.
- var(w)>0 measurement error exist
Attenuation bias formula, can we switch B2 to -B1
Yes.
What does RCT stand for?
Randomized controlled trial
3 examples for when exogeneity isn’t fulfilled
- omitted variables
- measurement error exists
- equilibrium conditions
OLS function for B^_1
E^[Y|X_1=1]-E^[Y|X_1=0] / E^[X|X_1=1] - E^[Y|X_1=0]
IV regression for B^_1
E^[Y|group1]-E^[Y|group 2] / E^[X|group1]-E^[X|group 2]
What does endogenous sorting do
reveals ceteris paribus effect horizontally.
Instrumental variable in IV
Z, binary or dummy
Instrumental exogeneity
E[U|Z]=0
Biv for instrumental variable
E^[Y|Z=1]-E^[Y|Z=0] / E^[X|Z=1]-E^[X|Z=0]
What does Instrumental exogeneity and instrument relevance mean and imply?
Instrument exogeneity: E[U|Z]=0
Instrument relevance: E^[X|Z=1]≠E^[X|Z=0]
both assures that we are only moving horizontally in graph.
OLS characteristics
- for all X1
- B^1= Cov^ (Y,X) / var (X)
for x binary
B^_1 = E^[Y|X=1]-E^[Y|X=0] / E^[X|X=1]-E^[X|X=0]
- slope coefficient: B^_1 is the estimated change in y and X when Z increases by one unit
IV characteristics
- for all X Z
- B^1= Cov^ (Y,Z) / cov ^ (X, Z)
for binary instrument
B^_1 = E^[Y|Z=1]-E^[Y|Z=0] / E^[X|Z=1]-E^[X|Z=0]
- slope coefficient: delta / fi is the estimated change in y and X when X´Z increases by one unit
What differs between the first stage and second stage regression in 2SLS
The regression at the second stage deviates from the OLS regressions that we have considered so far in that one of the regressors is an estimated quantity.
instrument relevance assumption
cov(X1,X2)≠0
Is this true: A linear model that may be suitable for causal inference may not be a good choice for prediction and vice versa.
True.