Week 3 & 4: Matters Affecting Validity Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Which case highlights that third party rights are not protected under void agreements.

A

Morrison v Robertson.
- M thought he was contracting with Wilson not T
- The contract with T was void
- There was an error in the substantials
- M had been induced into agreement by misrepresentation
- M entitled to get cows back from R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What case highlights that third party rights are protected under voidable agreements?

A

Macleod v Kerr.
- There was no error as to identity
- The contract between K and G was voidable not void
- Misrepresentation did not induce error therefore not an error in the substantial
- Car had been resold therefore restitutio in itegrum not possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

‘All people have capacity to enter into contracts.’

What are the four exceptions?

A
  1. Children*
  2. Incapable adults
  3. The intoxicated
  4. Illegal aliens
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Under what circumstances can children enter contracts.

A
  1. Bargains commonly entered into
  2. Not unreasonable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which Act regulates the ability for children to enter contracts?

A

Age of Legal Capacity (Scotland) Act 1991

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What Act provides for adults with incapacity in Scotland

A

Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What case highlights force and fear in the negotiation process ?

A

Earl of Orkney v Vinfra

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case highlights that the threat of lawful action does not constitute force and fear ?

A

Hunter v Bradford Property Trust Ltd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What case highlights that a right cannot be passed down if a party is facile or there is circumvention.

A

Macgilvary v Gilmartin.
- Daughter stayed with Mother following the passing of Father
- Daughter convinced Mother to sell property
- Mother declared unfit to understand and comprehend the implications of agreement
- Contract declared voidable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the three key elements of undue influence?

A
  1. Lack of independent council for weaker party
  2. Gratitious benifit for stronger party
  3. Ascendent and subordinate relationship between the parties
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the seven circumstances under which a contract may be declared void?

A
  1. Force and fear
  2. Age
  3. Incapable adults
  4. Intoxication
  5. Enemy aliens
  6. Induced unilateral error
  7. Bilateral error
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the circumstances under which a contract may be declared voidable?

A
  1. Facility and circumvention
  2. Undue influence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the two forms of bilateral error

A

Mutual: Parties are at cross purposes on an essential terms of the contract

Common: Parties both make the same mistake on an essential.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which case highlights mutual error?

A

Raffles v Winchelhaus.
- Mutual error as to ship (one leaving in October and one leaving in December)
- Both ships had the same name

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which case highlights common error?

A

Hamilton v Western Bank of Scotland
- A bank sold a property that it was not aware that it in fact did not own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which case highlights that a matter of opinion cannot be considered induced unilateral error?

A

Flynn v Scott.
- Party suggested van was in good working order.

17
Q

What was the judgement in Ritchie v Glass?

A

Induced unilateral error can be described as when a reasonable man only enters a contract because of the misrepresentation made by the other party.

18
Q

What are the three forms of misrepresentation?

A
  1. Innocent
  2. Fraudulent
  3. Negligent