Week 3 Flashcards

1
Q

4 Principles of Administration

A
  1. follow standardized procedure (same stimuli for everyone)
  2. the examiner is non-directive (let the client lead)
  3. Capture the clients performance accurately (write down all that is said by the client and you)
  4. Focus on what the client sees and how they see it (solve the problems the inkblot presents)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Materials

A

10 cards
2 location sheets
plenty of paper
two pens
clipboard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Preparation

A

have at least an hour to test
quiet area with no distractions
establish rapport
ask what they know about the Rorschach (investigate their knowledge, clarify any misunderstandings, “I want you to tell me what they look like to you”
Move to side-by-side seating, slightly behind
have the cards face down in order with card I at top

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Possible coaching or motivated distortion

A

Ask directly about preparation
if so, decide whether to proceed
if proceed, ask client if willing to be honest and spontaneous
Be familiar with public availability of materials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

2 phases

A

Response phase (what might this be)

Clarification phase (carefully worded questions to resolve coding ambiguities)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Administration Issues

A

what might this be –> then quiet

keep location sheets out of sight (but don’t be secretive)

Administration requires energy and focus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what not to do:

A

avoid saying:
ambiguous
unstructured
“there is no right or wrong answer”
“most people can/should say/do something”

don’t mislead the client into thinking that imagination or creativity is being tested

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can I turn it? Should I use the whole thing?

A

“its up to you”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How are they made?

A

briefly explain and move on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Does everybody look at different ones?

A

No, it is a standard set; everyone gets the same one”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what does it mean? is there a right answer?

A

Let’s discuss that once the testing is completed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

do you see it?

A

response phase: let’s come back to that after we go through the cards

Clarification phase: yes i see it. (or) No, not yet?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Prompt: first 2-3 cards

A

“what might this be”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Prompt: if only 1 response

A

try to see two things possibly three

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

when to pull

A

after 4 responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Card rejections

A

don’t accept
“take your time, there is no hurry.”

“look some more to see something else too”

“you can do it”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

if 15 of fewer responses

A

“thats fine, however we need a few more responses for the test for the test to be helpful. so lets go through the cards again. take your time when looking at them and see what other things you can come up with”

start with card 1 and say: “what else might this be”

do not use extra prompts

not necessary to get a response on each card
do not present a card on which they already gave 4 responses
once there are 4 pull the card!

add additional responses to the protocol and in the clarification phase clarify card by card (integrating the supplementary responses with each card)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Phase 2: Clarification phase

A

used only to resolve scoring uncertainties (location, determinants)
clarify key words or phrases (pretty, ugly, rotten, wild, mysterious, back there)

focus the questions to resolve coding dilemmas

write down everything said as best you can

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

how to ask in clarification phase:

A

verbatim

should include 1-2 questions
be directive as possible to minimize danger of influencing client’s answers
location clarification is rarely needed (no need to be overly precise)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

are clarification questions always needed

A

no
if you have enough information to score response phase

21
Q

visual language in the clarification phase

A

use “looks” “see”

rather than “suggests”

ex: what makes it look mean

22
Q

how to vary language so we dont set a problem-solving set:

A

“what makes it look like”
“help me see the”
“what gives it the look of”
“you said it was a dark stain”
“a deep valley”

23
Q

when responses are confusing…

A

“I’m not sure how you see it”

24
Q

clarifying when an ambiguous verbalization is one or two responses

A

repeat back the response and often the client will spontaneously clarify the question in your mind

if client reported 2 things, read the first and see if they clarify by including the second

If still not clarified, you may need to ask directly, “was that one or two answers”

25
Q

Clarification donts …

A

dont:
- ask questions that don’t have a purpose (target one or more specific coding category)
- ask too many questions
- keep going after a score you “know” must be there
- ask leading questions (is it moving? are you using color?)

26
Q

Documentation

A

document enough that another person could code the record (use common shorthand)
verbatim responses, relevant gestures
orientation of the card
note prompts and pulls
location on location sheet during clarification
ask client to slow down or repeat when necessary
put examiner comments/questions in parentheses
document if supplemental responses were needed
code as soon as possible!

27
Q

Coding principles

A

code:
- how client saw this cloud at this time (not clouds in general)
- what is articulated and sometimes gestures (rubbing the card)
- what is on the card, not something off the card (although it doesn’t have to be seen as long as it resides on the card)
- categories independent of each other
- what is seen in the RP (ignore CP info that contradicts the RP)

28
Q

Goal of coding

A

to code accurately not necessarily to see it the way they do

29
Q

Why is coding important

A

necessary to know what needs clarification

30
Q

coding problems are usually due to

A

due to clarification problems

31
Q

Inter-rater reliability

A

critical aspect of the Rorschach
85 studies done on reliability

32
Q

2 levels of reliability analysis

A

response level (response characteristics are coded)

Protocol levels (response characteristics are combined to form interpretive indexes)

33
Q

Calculating reliability

A

response level: K=PA-PC/1-PC)(range -1 to 1) (PC= proportion of chance agreement)

Protocol level: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) proportion of total variance in observers ratings that is attributable to true variation among target variables (range 0-1, 1 - perfect agreement)

34
Q

Viglione, Blume-marcovici, miller, Giromini and meyer (2012) results

A

Mean ICC of 62 RPAS indicators = .88
Std deviation = .11; median = .92)

35
Q

Test-retest reliability

A

strong

36
Q

Inter-rater reliability

A

seems to be good except for a few indicators

37
Q

what came out of Acklin et al study:

A

a coding book has been published with detailed guidelines covering how to code, presumably increasing those variables that showed lower inter-rate reliability

38
Q

<v>
</v>

A

card orientation

39
Q

W, D, Dd

A

location

40
Q

SR, SI

A

space reversal
Space integration

41
Q

Sy,Vg

A

synthesis
Vagueness

42
Q

2

A

pair

43
Q

o u -

A

form quality

44
Q

P

A

popular

45
Q

Pr/Pu

A

prompt
pull

46
Q

Extrapolation

A

FQ extrapolation must have the same shape, form features, and spatial orientation (not just content)

47
Q

Extrapolation for single objects

A

search FQ table for responses with similar shape
search like areas
search subcomponents of an objet (bird > wings, bull > horns)
consider results and make a determination

48
Q

extrapolation for multiple objects

A

score the lowest form quality of important components