Week 2 - Statutory Interpretation Flashcards
What is statutory interpretation
need for statutory interpretation due to ambiguity, inadequate expression, technical language or drafting errors
Parliament makes legislation, it is the role of the courts to interpret it
What is the primary rule of statutory interpretation
the plain meaning rule - is that the legislation does not need interpretation, and the meaning should be plain
What are the three rules of statutory interpretation?
The literal rule - The ordinary meaning of the words
The golden rule - Where the ordinary meaning could contradict or limit the intention of Parliament
The mischief rule - Considering the problem the law is trying to address
What is the purposive approach
The modern approach is the purposive approach
seeks to arrive at the best interpretation of the words
What is the modern approach
This is the leading case on the modern approach to statutory interpretation hold, as per Lord Bingham
It is to give effect to parliament’s purpose. So the controversial provision should be read in the context of the statute as a whole, and the statute as a whole should be read in the historical context of the situation
What does intrinsic aids mean
This is that courts will look beyond the wording of a provision to other parts of the statute.
Matters within the act itself to make it clearer
- Long title
- Section description - titles or different parts of the legislation
- Definition in the legislation itself
- Neighbouring provisions - could be in other parts of the legislation
What does extrinsic aids mean
This is that courts will look beyond the statute to other sources that are part of the legislative process, other statutes or academic writing
- Pre-parliamentary material
- Law Commission reports
- Command papers and consultations
- Explanatory notes - support public awareness and public explanation
- Parliamentary material
- Other statues
- Academic literature
The wording of the statute
The first principle is that the courts will read the act as a whole
Then there are three common rules, known by their Latin terms:
- Noscitur a sociis
- Ejusdem Generis
- Expressio unius exclusion alterius
Noscitur a Sociis
This means “known by the company it keeps”
Words in a statute derive meaning from the words around them. The provision should be read in the context of its neighbouring provisions
Presumed that a word should have the same meaning throughout the act unless the legislation says the word should be interpreted differently
Ejusdem Generis
This means of the same type
If wondering with general meaning follows a list of specific words in a statute, then the general wording applies to things of the same type as the specific words
For example, the Customs Consolidation Act 1876 reads: The importation of arms, ammunition, gunpowder or any other goods may be prohibited
Expressio unius excursion alterius
Expressio unius exclusion alterius means “to express one thing is to exclude another”
If there are only specific words, then the list is considered exhaustive
For example, section 2(3) of the immigration act 1983 states that the meaning of ‘parent’ in section 2(1) includes the mother of an illegitimate child. This means that the more general term parents are to be limited to mothers
The use of Hansard
The use of Hansard in interpreting a statute should follow the rules set out in the leading case of Pepper v Hart
- The legislation in question is ambiguous, obscure
- The material relied on consists of statements by a minister (or promoter of the Bill)
- The statements relied upon are clear
What are some key presumptions or working rules
The statute will not alter the common law
The crown is not bound by the statute
Men’s rea is required for criminal offences
The statute will work prospectively
The statute will work in favour of the defendant
Note these are presumptions are rebuttable - this means that they are working rules, but it could be that the legislation is intended to change them
Declarations of incompatibility
These are cases where the courts have been called upon to make declarations of incompatibility with the Convention