Week 2 RESEARCH METHODS Flashcards

1
Q

Key components to a statistical investigation are:

A

Planning the study: ask testable research question & decide how to collect the data

Examining the data: how? Using what graphs?

Reliability: consistency of measure

Validity: degree to which a measure is assessing what it is intended to measure (how much smth is actually testing what it’s supposed to)

Inferring from the data: draw inferences “beyond” the data

Drawing conclusions: based on what you learned, what can you draw?

Cause and effect conclusion: whether one variables changes the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Distributional thinking

A

Data varies, so think of meaningful ways to capture that data-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Pattern of variation:

A

the distribution of the data (how variated it is)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Statistical significance/Significance:

A

a result is important only if it is unlikely to be caused by chance but rather science

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

P-value

A

the amount of probability something might happen (want it to be low, so that it can actually be related to science)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sample: (DEF)

A

subset of individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Population: (DEF)

A

large group of individuals that sample came from and represents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Generalized

A

Conclusions from a sample can be generalized to represent the larger population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Random sample: (DEF)

A

use probability to select subset of people for a sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Margin of error: (DEF)

A

statistic expressing the amount of random sampling error in the results of a survey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Randomly assigning: (DEF)

A

using probability-based method to divide sample into smaller treatment groups (Balances all variables)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Correlational design

A

▪ When scientists passively observe and measure phenomena

▪ Do not interfere and change behavior.

▪Identify patterns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Positive correlation (scatter plot)

A

variables move together (inr. slope)
as x incr. y incr.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

negative correlation (scatter plot)

A

variables move in opposite directions (dcr. slope)
as x incr. y decr.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strong VS weak correlation

A

strong: Higher absolute value
weak: if close to 0 variables are unrelated to eachother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If correlation found, can you assume there is causation?

A

NO. CORRELATION =/= CAUSATION
Just because 2 variables have a correlation, can’t say they are caused by one other because don’t know which one came first. perhaps confounding variable present.

17
Q

Experimental design

A

▪ Researchers measure abstract concepts, like happiness, with operational definitions

▪ Random assignment so participants can choose their conditions

▪ Researchers manipulate independent variable to observe changes in dependent variable

18
Q

Operational definitions: (DEF)

A

Should be clear, objective, and specific to be tested and quantified

19
Q

Confounding variables: (DEF)

A

other things that affect influences both IV and DV

20
Q

Examples of cofounding variables

A

▪ Placebo effect
▪ Experimenter expectations
▪ Participant demand

21
Q

Double-blind procedure: (DEF)

A

experimenter nor participant knows participant’s conditions

22
Q

Qualitative designs:

A

Allows to study topics that we cant experimentally manipulate.

23
Q

Observation

A

often involves researcher embedding self into group- (ex. Wanted to study cult, pretending to be in cult)

24
Q

Case study

A

examines specific individuals or contexts

25
Q

Narrative analysis

A

studies stories and personal accounts (analyze themes, structures, and dialogues of these narrative)

26
Q

Quasi- Experimental designs:

A

▪ does not require random assignment
▪ Subjects assigned to nonrandom groups (e.g. marriages, classes)
▪ Treated as IVs

27
Q

Longitudinal studies

A

Def: follows same group of individuals over time
More precise than a survey but quite costly to conduct

28
Q

Internal validity: (DEF)

A

make sure results are bc of iv being changed (not biases and not confounds)

29
Q

External validity: (DEF)

A

make sure results can be applied to other studies (if post results, people can use them to apply to other situations)

30
Q

External or Internal validity? which one more important and why?

A

Internal

31
Q

Field studies:

A

doesn’t happen in the lab/in the feild

32
Q

Ecological validity: (DEF)

A

rather than being so controlled (in a lab setting) makes the experiment more natural and day-to-day(being in a lab is so controlled, so less likely to happen in real world)

33
Q

Experience-sampling method: (Studying psychology in the real world)

A

participants report throughout their day

34
Q

Diary method: (Studying psychology in the real world)

A

participants report and have questionnaire at the end of their day

35
Q

Electronically activated recorder (EAR): (Studying psychology in the real world)

A

put something in ur ear to record different parts and understand day-to-day experiences

35
Q

Day reconstruction method (DRM): (Studying psychology in the real world)

A

obtains info by having participant systematically break down and reflect on
prior day, noting feelings/mood changes of distinct events

36
Q

Ambulatory assessments: (Studying psychology in the real world)

A

EEGs, ECGs, sweat tests, and biomarkers all help study physiology in daily lives

37
Q

Linguistic analyses:

A

way to extract grammatical and psychological info from a test by counting word frequencies