Week 2-Grounded Theory Flashcards

1
Q

What is Grounded Theory?

A

-An approach to research that aims to produce a ‘theory’ grounded in the data (Birks and Mills, 2022, p.4)

-Widely used method of analysing qualitative data

-Set of guidelines for collecting and analysing qualitative data

-Involves creating codes by defining what you see in the data, not according to preconceived ideas – codes “grounded” in the data

-Use of constant comparison - persistent interaction with the data (Constant comparison =constantly interacting with the data e.g., codes, interviews)

-Involves forming a theory based on the collected data as opposed to collecting data after forming a theory (i.e., as in quant research).

-Lots of variation depending on theoretical stance: Glaser & Straus (1967), Strauss (1987), Charmaz (2003).

-It’s a philosophy in itself (a way of thinking)

-You produce a theory at the end following those themes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 3 main key characteristics of grounded theory?

A
  1. Systematic – The process by which theory is generated is through the careful application of the general principles and methods of grounded theory
  2. Guidelines: GT is essentially a set of guidelines which guide data collection, analysis, and theory generation
  3. Inductive NOT deductive – focuses on generating theories rather than confirming them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the origins of Grounded Theory? (Glaser & Strauss, 1965; 1967)

A

-To provide a sound basis for thorough qualitative research

-”the embarrassing gap between theory and empirical research”

-The first attempt to apply the same logic and rigor of quantitative data analysis to qualitative data (They wanted a strong robust methodology for qualitative research)

-Goal was to systematize/ standardize the collection, coding and analysis of qualitative data for the purpose of generating theory:

-Theoretical sampling

-Constant comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the case of the nurse and the dying patient? (Quint, 1967)

A

-The ‘Awareness of dying study’ 1965 (Glaser and Strauss)

-Known as the first GT publication (i.e., book) ever released

-Transformed models of palliative care

-Provided expert clinical input and the ‘patient voice’.

-Was Quint instrumental to GT formulation too? Highlights that GT was developed in multi-disciplinary setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How did Glaser and Strauss split? (aka Glaser vs Strauss)

A

-They eventually split in the 1990s and developed divergent schools of thought

-“Glaserian” and “Straussian” versions of grounded theory (Then Charmaz too*)

-Consequence: confusion around exactly what grounded theory procedures and terms are in the literature!

*We use “Constructivist” GT in the Department of Psychology (“Charmaz”) More on this to come…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the methodological and philosophical differences between Glaser and Strauss?

A

Glaser:
-Starts with a completely empty mind
-Has a less structured coding process
-Researcher is passive
-Anything can be used as data – even quant!
-Inductive only

Strauss:
-Has a general idea of where to start
-Has a more structured coding process
-Researcher is active
-Only traditionally qualitative data
-Believed in inductive, deductive and verification for GT. Then abductive. (and Corbin believed this too!)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Inductive Reasoning?

A

-Deals with probability

-Reasoning based on the likely conclusions based on the data

-Empirical observation and data/measurements

-Bottom up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Deductive Reasoning?

A

-Certainty (confirmation of theory)

-Produces a truth value

-Rationalism

-Top down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Abductive Reasoning?

A

-Guesswork

-Forms a hypothesis or likely explanation

-Rooted in both inductive and deductive thinking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Strauss and Corbin (1998a) say about the right way to analyse?

A

“Sometimes, one has to use common sense and not get caught up in worrying about what is the right or wrong way. The important thing is to trust oneself and the process. Students should stay within the general guidelines… and use the procedures and techniques flexibly according to their abilities and the realities of their studies”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Charmez’s (2014) Constructivist view on Grounded Theory?

A

-Reality is not an absolute or a positional “truth”

-“Constructivism” A paradigm that asserts that reality is constructed by those who experience it (Birks & Mills, 2022, p30)

-Or “constructionist”? Encourages researchers to present a social construction of reality through the GT research.

-Process between researcher and participant

-Found research has preconceived ideas and theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When can you use Grounded Theory?

A

-When you want to generate a theory: Understanding of social processes, experiences of a phenomenon

-When there is little or no existing research available on a topic: Exploratory, generates ideas for further research

-Can be used with any type of qualitative data: media content, conversations, focus groups, biographical data etc.. (Particularly well suited to interview data)

-Need to decide on a grounded theory analysis before data collection starts due to the sampling methods involved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 6 key features of Grounded Theory? (Tie, Birks & Francis, 2019)

A
  1. Theoretical sensitivity
  2. Theoretical sampling
  3. Memo-writing
  4. Stages of coding
  5. Constant comparison
  6. Data saturation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is involved in step 1 Theoretical Sensitivity? (Tie, Birks & Francis, 2019)

A

STEP 1 - Enter the research with as few predetermined ideas as possible:
-Literature review not carried out until after analysis (Literature review starts influencing your interviews)

-Debatable as subject dependant, but this prevents extensive reading

-Researcher not totally naïve – already has ‘sensitising concepts’ (basic understanding of topic)

STEP 2 - The ability to generate concepts from data and relate them meaningfully:
-Immersion: See from the respondent’s point of view

-Questioning: Who, when, what, where, how much, why?

-Researcher needs to be aware of implicit meanings of the data

-Theoretical sensitivity is creative, insightful, conceptual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the Principles of Sampling? (Tie, Birks & Francis, 2019)

A

Convenience sampling: Initial participants to identify scope and major themes/components

(The majority of themes are collected within the first four interviews of thematic analysis. Guest et al., 2020)

Purposeful sampling: Participants are selected by initial participants or through specific inclusion criteria via research question

Theoretical sampling: Participants are selected according to emerging concepts

Theoretical group model: Group interviews would be conducted to expand upon and verify the emerging model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is involved in step 2 Theoretical Sampling? (Tie, Birks & Francis, 2019)

A

-Unique to Grounded Theory (Also known as purposive sampling)

-The process of selecting “incidents, slices of life, time periods, or people on the basis of their potential manifestation or representation of important theoretical constructs” (Patton, 2002, p.238).

-Start with an initial (a priori) sample

-Generally, quite broad inclusion criteria

-Further cases included on the basis of their usefulness in generating theory

-Simultaneous data collection & analysis (Constant Comparison)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is involved in step 3 Memo Writing? (Tie, Birks & Francis, 2019)

A

-Cannot be over-emphasised!

Writing memos throughout analysis:
-Reflective memos during data collection
-Guides theoretical sampling
-Coding & theory generation

-Start as soon as you have interesting ideas

-Object is to increase theoretical sensitivity

-They evolve – need to come back to them as analysis progresses

-Should be conceptual and not descriptive

-Sometimes it can be descriptive (whatever you need in the moment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was Strauss & Corbin’s (1998) take on Memo Writing?

A

-Varies in length & detail

-At the start ‘awkward and simple’

-Individual styles

-Forces you to work with concepts, not data

-Force reflection & coherence

-Necessary at end of any analytic session

-Can be written from other memos, not just raw data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is involved in step 4 Stages of Coding? (Tie, Birks & Francis, 2019)

A

-Open coding (codes)

-Axial coding (categories)

-Selective coding (themes)

-Theory formation

-Literature review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is Open Coding? (Tie, Birks & Francis, 2019)

A

-Read the transcript line-by-line

-Name each potential code of data

-Varied and numerous

-Quick, generative – can produce 100s of codes

-For exploratory studies, there may be open codes across the data.

-For specific research questions, open codes may be more focused

-Each code should be one or two words (no more than three)

-If more than 1 words, the words should be linked (usually an adjective and noun)

-Can use words which the respondent uses

-However, be mindful as this can create ‘over-coding’

-Gives you leads to pursue

-Start memo writing at this stage; open codes….

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is Axial Coding? (Tie, Birk & Francis, 2019)

A

-Creation of higher-order codes (“conceptual categories”) from open codes (per transcript)

-Only those that reflect data most accurately.

Looking for:
-Relationships between categories
-Properties of categories
-Action-oriented

Form categories by:
-Bunching frequent, similar codes into a single category
-Can form a category based on 2 frequent, opposing codes (e.g., safe/fearful or anxious/relieved)

-Still memo-writing

-Look for quotes to support your categories (in the appendix)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is Selective Coding? (Tie, Birk & Francis, 2019)

A

-“The process of integrating and refining categories” (Strauss & Corbin, 1998)

-Now looking across all transcripts

-Form themes based on axial categories

-No set number of themes; this is data dependant

-All themes should be made up of categories which appear in at least two of the interviews.

-Bunch frequent, similar categories into a single theme

-Only those that reflect data most accurately.

-Now a lot more abstract & generalised

-Look for quotes to support these themes (to go in your results)

-Reflexive: Return to open and axial codes

-Start of theory formation

23
Q

What is involved in step 5 Constant Comparison? (Tie, Birks & Francis, 2019)

A

-“The principle analytic task, [it involves] continually sifting and comparing elements throughout the lifetime of a project” (Richardson, 1996, p.78)

Comparisons can include:
-Code to code, case to case, situation to situation, concept to concept

Finding questions to ask for comparative purposes
-What’s going on between this code or category and previous ones? Or category & sub-categories?
-What patterns are occurring here?
-What’s going on with this respondent compared to that one?
-What’s the basic socio-psychological problem?

24
Q

How can we include new research questions into the schedule?

A

-Instinctual

-Co-incidental

-Just quickly ask – do not want to prejudice the participant response

-Listen for intensity of response:
-“oh wow yes, I never thought of this”
-“yes, but not much”

-Explore but be mindful that the new question should be representative of the study’s main research question

-Stay critical yet inquisitive

25
Q

What is involved in step 6 Data Saturation? (Tie, Birks & Francis, 2019)

A

-Theoretical saturation of data means that researchers reach a point in their analysis of data that theoretical sampling of more data will not lead to new information related to their research questions.

-No additional data can be found to generate new relationships and concepts

-Researchers see the same codes, categories, and themes in their data repeatedly

-Empirically confident that data is saturated

How much is enough?:
-Guest et al. (2006) – “Twelve interviews is enough”
-Vasileou et al. (2018) – study and context dependent

-Essentially you keep getting the same information again and again

26
Q

What are the characteristics of a core theme?

A

-It’s central!

-Frequent appearance in data

-Abstract

-Can explain variation in the data

-There may be more than one

27
Q

How can we choose the core theme?

A

-Reviewing earlier stages of coding

-Reviewing memos

-The focal part of an emerging storyline

-You generally just know by this point.

-But avoid circularity!

28
Q

How can we generate a theory?

A

Generating relationships between the themes and both the core theme and each other - interrelationships:
-Writing a storyline
-Moving from description to conceptualisation
-Diagramming (very common, goes in your appendix)
-Reviewing coding and memos

-Essentially, the product of this is the grounded theory

-Main question should always be “does it answer the initial research question/s?”

-Structure of the theory should emerge naturally from the themes in the analysis

-Does it answer the initial research question/s?

-Theory must be explanatory, not descriptive…

-No two grounded theories will look the same

29
Q

Storytelling: How do we build Grounded Theory? (The nuts and bolts of the GT write-up)

A

Facilitates integration, construction, formulation and presentation:

Theory takes precedence

Allows for variation

Limits gaps

Evidence is grounded

Style is appropriate

30
Q

Storytelling: What is meant by Theory takes precedence?

A

-The theory is the end goal of the process

-The theoretical constructs (categories and their relationships) are discussed

-Balancing Act: Between making the story accessible and reflective of the analysis

-Charmez (2006) states that it is possible to write an interesting imaginative and inspired grounded theory.

31
Q

Storytelling: What is meant by Allows for variation?

A

-Do not need to account for every piece of information

-Be selective with your evidence or “voice”

-Ensure different perspectives of the ‘similar’ are represented

32
Q

Storytelling: What is meant by Limits Gaps?

A

-Storyline format helps identify gaps and inconsistencies

-Construction is intuitive and logical

-Avoid poetic license

-Use supporting literature or further data to describe or fill in gaps for narrative

33
Q

Storytelling: What is meant by Evidence is grounded?

A

-Integration of the data and using the data as the ”voice” to carry the category/theme

-Evidence as direct quotes

-Provides validity

34
Q

Storytelling: What is meant by Style Appropriate?

A

-Presentation is key

-Technical aspect of cohesion and digestibility

-Write for a broad audience

35
Q

How can we select appropriate quotes?

A

-Let the respondents voice be heard

-Select either “typical” or “poignant” quotes

-Typical quotes highlight the essence of a theme or inter-relationship

-“e.g., theme of support – “she helps me emotionally and practically”

-Poignant quotes highlight the extent of the theme or inter-relationship – should be emotive

-E.g., “without her help I would have died”

Quotes should be:
-Evocative, thought provoking, emotive, attention grabbing, add to the story, explain the story

36
Q

How do you Contextualise quotes in the write up?

A

-Quotes can’t stand by themselves in isolation

-Need to be illustrative of research findings

When reporting quotes:
-Say what the finding is
-Introduce the quote by saying who said it and in what context
-Provide the quote
-Comment on the quote by comparing it to other quotes from the same person, other quotes from different people on the same topic, etc.

37
Q

What are the 3 Methodological Considerations of GT?

A
  1. Trustworthy
  2. Reliability
  3. Generalisability
38
Q

What is Trustworthiness within GT Methods?

A

-Help ensure grounded theory is more than “just a nice story” (Sikolia et al., 2013)

-Some strategies lie within the grounded theory method:
1. Theoretical Sampling
2. Constant Comparison

39
Q

What is Theoretical sampling?

A

-Opposing cases that may refute our theory

-Examination of cases that contradict the initial coding

-Exploring all avenues

40
Q

What is Constant comparison?

A

-Continually asking whether new data provides similar codes, categories and themes to previous data

-Staying close to the original data to ensure respondent’s voice is heard

41
Q

What is Data Triangulation?

A

-Combination of different interpretations of different data types

-This allows for a richer and more acceptable version of the research question

-Allows for a more objective and pragmatic perspective across all data

-Form of GT mastery

42
Q

What are some analytic strategies?

A

-Questioning (Question even if it makes sense)

-Making comparisons

-Thinking about the various meanings of a word

-Looking at language

-Looking at the emotions that are expressed

-Looking for words that indicate time

-Thinking in terms of metaphors or similes

-Looking for the negative

-Using other analytical tools if needed

43
Q

Analytic strategies: What is flip-flopping? (Corbin & Strauss, 2015)

A

-Viewing a concept from varying perspectives

-‘Opposite, inverse or similar’ in comparison

-Raises your thinking to a more abstract level

Example word “negligence”:
-Legal or colloquial?
-Implications of this word?
What is the context? Can it be used in other frameworks?

44
Q

Analytic techniques: What is meant by waving the red flag?

A

-“when biases, assumptions or beliefs are intruding into the analysis” (Corbin & Strauss, 2015, p.98).

The researcher is an instrument of the data analysis:
-post-positivistic position
-“intruding” or are we “unduly influencing”?

-Need to be aware and ready to ‘wave the red flag’ if we are missing any higher levels of abstraction

-Be aware of absolutist statements of ‘always’, ‘never’, ‘everyone’, or ‘no way’

-Basically you’re putting words in their (it’s you not them)

45
Q

How can our preconceptions affect the analysis process?

A

-Assumptions can be deeply ingrained - influence often imperceivable

-Personal, professional, experiential history informs theoretical sensitivity

-Acknowledge your own assumptions/preconceptions

-Try to articulate them

-Do this at the beginning of the project

-Include it in memo (along with everything else)

-Staying ‘true to the data’ and challenging oneself is a grounded theorist

46
Q

How can one mitigate one’s own bias?

A
  1. Memoing
  2. Self-Reflection diary
  3. Presuppositional interviewing

-Acknowledgment is key for the data and for transparency

47
Q

How can we justify the sampling method?

A

Memo, memo, memo:
-Are there any easy elements of recruitment?
-Any challenges to reflect upon?

-Sampling will be presented within your methods section

-May need to re-address this in Discussion:
-Strengths
-Limitations

48
Q

What are the practicalities of sampling?

A

How can it be achieved within a short time frame?
-Under-grad / Post-grad study

Reliance on patient organisations or social media groups for recruitment:
-Not all will support the study
-Reach out before ethics for their recruitment strategy

Who are your participants?
-Adults (general adult population)
-Children
-Parents/Caregivers
-Professionals
-Vulnerable individuals

49
Q

What are the advantages of the design?

A

■ Theoretical sampling allows cases to be chosen based on their usefulness to
the emerging theory. Allows us to select opposing cases that may refute our
theory and examine cases that contradict the initial coding.

■ Advantageous design where there is little or no existing literature on a topic. Exploratory in nature and generates lots of ideas for future research.

50
Q

What are the advantages regarding the interview-based aspect?

A

■ Flexible in that it can be used with any type of qualitative data (i.e. media
content, conversations, focus groups, biographical data)

■ In-depth interviews with open questions and prompts allow for rich, detailed data
and thick description

51
Q

What are the advantages regarding the analysis-based aspect?

A

■ Structured coding process ensures rigour and consistency in the analysis approach. Also provides a clear set of analytic guidelines for novice researchers.

■ Constant comparison asks whether new data provides similar codes, categories and
themes to previous data which ensures that the researcher stays close to the original
data and ensures the respondent’s voice is heard.

52
Q

What are the disadvantages of the design?

A

■ Lots of variants of grounded theory design depending on theoretical stance (e.g.
Charmaz, Strauss, Glaser) leaves confusion around exactly what grounded theory procedures and terms are in the literature

■ Must decide on grounded theory analysis in planning stages due to the sampling
methods involved, cannot be decided mid-way through a study.

53
Q

What are the disadvantages regarding the interview-based aspect?

A

■ Burdensome in terms of time for researcher and participant and resource
intensive (both arranging face to face interviews and transcription of interviews)

■ Preparation of the interview schedule must be carefully planned otherwise there
is a risk that the questions may be prescriptive or leading

54
Q

What are the disadvantages regarding the analysis-based aspect?

A

■ Grounded theory tends to produce large amounts of data which can be difficult
to manage during analysis and requires skill

■ Grounded theory analysis requires subjective interpretation of data and may be prone to researcher bias