WEEK 2 Criminology Paradigm and Criminal Theory Flashcards
Terms, Naming and Theorists
paradigm
is like a toolbox of ideas and methods for studying crime. Schools of thought are different approaches within this toolbox, each focusing on specific aspects of crime.
- Classical Paradigm
Era: 18th century
Principles:
Rationality
Free will
Morality knowing what is right or wrong
Pain-pleasure
Deterrence
Individual choice
Theories:
Rational choice
punishment will stop crime
you can Crime prevention
Opportunity
Application: Law, enforcement, punishment
Issues: Rationality assumption, neglects social factors, punishment debate and lack of systematic injustice and inequalities
- Positivist Paradigm:
Time: 19th century
Beliefs:
Behavior not fully under control
Causes: Biology, psychology, society
Focus on understanding criminals
Uses scientific methods
Predicts behavior
Theories:
Biosocial theories
Treatment:
Rehabilitation focus
Issues:
Ethical concerns
Neglects societal factors
Effectiveness of rehab questioned
- Interactionist Paradigm:
Key Idea:
Criminals are created through labeling and societal reactions.
Perspectives:
Looks at society’s view and the individual’s view.
Response:
Focuses on how society and the justice system respond.
Theories:
Includes theories like differential association, broken windows, and labeling theory.
- Critical Paradigm:
Perspectives: Draws from critical, conflict, and radical viewpoints.
Root Causes: Social structures and resulting inequality.
Social Conflict: Norms favor powerful; law used for control.
Radical Criminology: Capitalism fosters crime; focuses on power dynamics.
Impact: Examines differential treatment based on class, race, and gender.
social structure vs social process
Social Structure:
Examines how society’s framework relates to crime.
Investigates why certain communities experience high crime rates.
Analyzes social factors influencing individual criminal behavior.
Considers societal features affecting crime rates in specific areas.
Social Process:
Explores how individuals are socialized.
Investigates how socialization can lead to criminality.
Focuses on the process by which individuals develop criminal behaviors.
Concentric Zone Theory
Developed by Robert E. Park and Ernest W. Burgess
Divided the city of Chicago into five concentric zones to study urban dynamics and crime rates.
Zones:
Central Business District: City’s main hub for businesses and commerce.
Transition Zone: Mix of residential, industrial, and commercial areas with social and economic instability.
Inner City/Working Class Zone: Older residential areas occupied by working-class families.
Residential Zone: Newer housing developments with middle and upper-class families.
Commuter Zone: Suburbs and rural areas where residents commute to the city for work.
collective efficacy
To address social disorganization, collective efficacy, which combines informal social control and neighborhood cohesion, can reduce crime. It involves neighbors intervening to maintain public order without formal legal intervention, based on mutual trust and solidarity.
Recap of Social Disorganisation
Social disorganization: Community can’t maintain values or control due to instability.
Factors: Residential instability, diversity, family disruptions.
Result: Lack of control fuels crime and deviance.
Breakdown: Social cohesion, common goals hinder organization and child supervision.
Impact: Disrupted institutions like schools, families shape communities.
Shaw and McKay: Disorganization leads to delinquent gangs passing on norms.
Effect: Crime perpetuated across generations.
Policy Implications of Social Disorganization Theory:
Make things better like roads and buildings.
Make laws stronger to keep people safe.
Help people get along better in communities.
Help families with things they need.
Have police work closely with communities.
Get neighbors to watch out for each other.
Help people who need support more.
Encourage programs that help dads be good parents.
Strain/Anomie Theory
by Robert K Merton
Economic success emphasis weakens norms.
“American Dream” focuses on wealth.
Over-prioritizing money undermines proper goal pursuit.
“Blocked opportunity” leads to crime.
Crime arises when goals can’t be achieved rightly.
Merton’s five adaptations.
Conformity: Accepting goals and proper means.
Innovation: Pursuing goals through unauthorized means.
Ritualism: Giving up goals but sticking to accepted means.
Retreatism: (drop out) withdrawing from society, rejecting both goals and means.
Rebellion: Opposing societal goals and means, seeking change.
General Strain Theory
by Robert Agnew
Builds on Merton’s theory, focusing on individual-level explanations.
Emphasizes the role of emotions in response to structural conditions and strain.
Defines strain as disliked events or conditions experienced by individuals.
Identifies three sources of strain:
Loss of positively valued stimuli, like losing a parent.
Aversive or negative treatment by others, such as living in a violent household or experiencing bullying.
Inability to achieve positively valued goals, such as economic success or good grades.
Subjective Strain vs. Objective Strain
Objective strain: Disliked event or condition generally disliked by most people, like losing a parent.
Subjective strain: Disliked event or condition specifically disliked by the individual, such as conflicts with parents.
Vicarious strain: Strain experienced by others around the individual.
Statement: Subjective strain is more predictive of criminal behavior than objective strain.