Week 2 Flashcards
Quantitative Design methods
Use mathematical analyses
Descriptive statistics
Inferential statistics
Goal
To describe, compare, predict factors (variables)
Reasoning
Deductive
but inductive approach to form hypothesis if one is used
Experimental
experiment- randomized control trial
Quasi-experiment- pretest/post test and case design
Non- experimental
Observational / Descriptive / Exploratory
Cohort study
Case control
Cross-sectional / correlational
Randomized Clinical Trial / Randomized Controlled Trial(RCT)
Prospective
An intervention is intentionally applied (variable is manipulated)
Purpose is to test a hypothesis
A set of subjects is:
Identified
Sorted randomly into groups
One group receives intervention (treatment) = intervention group
One group receives no intervention (treatment) = control group
Random allocation allows:
comparison of group outcomes because randomization strongly increases the likelihood of homogeneity (similarity) between the groups
a.k.a. The chance of another factor (a confounding variable) existing more frequently in one of the groups and influencing the outcomes is reduced
To provide sufficient factor variation amongst individuals so that the groups are homogeneous require:
larger sample size
Design is prospective = direction of time in study is forward moving
Advantages vs disadvantages
Disadvantages:
Expensive
Sometimes not ethical to have control groups that do not receive treatment
Advantages:
Can indicate causation
Variations
Testing between multiple interventions
Interventions A & B, Control C
Compare A x C B x C (A + B) x C (A x C) x (B x C)
Non-homogeneous population
Use stratification
Case Design
1 subject or several subjects is (are) subjected to an event or intervention and evaluated on outcome(s) of interest
Prospective study
The ‘outcome of interest’ is measured at the start of the study and after the intervention
Subject therefore acts as its own control