Week 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Three methods to evidence research

A

-informally -focused -surveying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Generalisability

A

How the results work for various people in various places

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Secondary research

A

Combination of primary studies and their results and drawing conclusions from there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Detection bias

A

Differences in how treatment and control groups are assessed or measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Database inclusion bias

A

Bias to systematic reviews. Studies much more easily found because they are online

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Trunctuation

A

Identifies variations of a word without the need to individually enter each word E.G. hypno (hypnosis and hypnotherapy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Informally researching evidence

A

Surfing to quench curiosity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Boolean Operators

A

OR AND NOT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Our version of NHMRC guidelines

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Publication biases

A

Affects systematic reviews, omits unpopular topics so reviewers review is impacted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Allocation bias

A

Participants not allocated fairly, needs to be randomised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case series

A

Test outcomes before and after treatment, no control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Measurement bias

A

Outcomes measured inaccurately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Surveying evidence research

A

Studying existing literature prior to research project or clinical scenario

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Time lag bias

A

Bias to systematic reviews. Delays in publication prevent it being reviewed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reviewers personal bias

A

Bias to systematic reviews. May unfairly exclude an article they don’t like

17
Q

Attrition bias

A

Some participants leave the study so there is more in one group

18
Q

Duplication publication bias

A

Bias to systematic reviews. Same results continuously published, makes it appear to have more evidence

19
Q

Aetiological Study

A

Study of cause or origin. E.g. does playing competitive netball during adolescence increase risk of osteoarthritis in knee in later years

20
Q

Prospective cohort study

A

Study of future impact of something on a cohort

21
Q

Prognostic Study

A

Examine risk factors and their influence on disease

22
Q

Applicability

A

How the results apply to specific situations in healthcare

23
Q

4 Barriers of research evidence

A

-lack of time -lack of facilities -lack of searching skills -information overload

24
Q

Performance bias

A

Events other than the intended treatment happen during the experiment

25
Q

Outcome reporting bias

A

Bias to systematic reviews. Mainly desirable and expected results are published

26
Q

Primary research

A

Single research study

27
Q

Citation bias

A

Bias to systematic reviews. If many other authors cite this study it’s going to get more attention

28
Q

Four grades of recommendations

A

1)can be trusted to guide practice 2) can be trusted to guide practice in most situations 3) provides support for recommendations 4)weak and therefore recommendation must be applies with caution

29
Q

3 effective searching techniques

A

-Boolean operators -Trunctuation -Wildcard

30
Q

Wildcard

A

Enables altering of one search term to account for many different ways a word can be spelt. E.G. randomi?ation

31
Q

Focused evidence research

A

Looking for answers, having a question and researching accordingly

32
Q

Language bias

A

Bias to systematic reviews. A preference among reviewers for studies published in their dominant language