Week 2/3 Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

2 branches of statistics

A

Descriptive statistics - Organise, summarise, and communicate numerical information

Inferential statistics - Use representative sample data to draw conclusions about a population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Population

A

a collection of all possible members of a defined group
Could be any size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sample

A

A set of observations drawn from a subset of the population of interest
A portion of the population
Sample results are used to estimate the population results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Operationalisation

A

Refers to the logical connection between the measure and the theoretical construct, or to the process by which we try to derive a measure from a theoretical construct.

Starting off with a vague concept and narrowing it down to come up with a precise way to measure it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Psychological measurement examples

A

Examples – age, intelligence, memory for an event, happiness levels, how often someone drinks alcohol

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Theoretical construct

A

A thing you’re trying to take a measurement of
e.g. age, opinions, motives for drinking alcohol

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Measure

A

Refers to the method or the tool that you use to make your observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Variable

A

What we end up with when we apply our measure to something in the world. That is, variables are the actual “data” that we end up with in our data sets.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Types of variables - Continuous

A

Can take on a full range of values (usually decimals)
How tall are you?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Types of variables - discrete

A

Variables that can only take on specific values
e.g. Number of students
Can assign discrete values to things we’d normally consider words.
e.g. Political party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Classification of variables - Discrete

A

Nominal: category or name, frequency of belonging to a category – e.g., handedness

Ordinal: ranking of data; clear order to data but distance between points may vary – e.g., place in a race, 1st, 2nd, 3rd place etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Classification of variables - Continuous

A

Interval: used with numbers that are equally spaced; Order to data points, fixed distance between points and negative values – e.g., temperature, 1º is always the same, negative temperatures possible

Ratio: like interval, order to data points, fixed distance between points, but has a meaningful 0 point (absence of the thing you are measuring); no negative values – e.g., height, always measured in cm, no negative heights

Generally described as scale variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Examples of variables

A

Nominal: name of biscuit
Ordinal: ranking of favourite biscuits
Interval: temperature of biscuits
Ratio: how many biscuits are left?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Likert scales

A

(1) Strongly disagree
(2) Disagree
(3) Neither agree nor disagree
(4) Agree
(5) Strongly agree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Independent variables

A

For a true experiment: must be manipulated – meaning you changed it

Generally dichotomous variables (nominal) like experimental group versus control group

Variable you manipulate or categorise
For quasi experiment: used naturally occurring groups, like age; year of study
Still dichotomous, but you didn’t assign the group

when IVs are categorical, the groups are called levels
If political party is an IV, levels could be Conservative or Labour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

+Dependant variables

A

The outcome information, what you measured in the study to find differences/changes based on the IV

Generally, these are interval/ratio variables, but you can use nominal ones too

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Independent/dependent variables examples

A

Independent variable – Whether participants have 1 or 3 drinks
e.g. Group A – 1 drink
Group B – 3 drinks

Dependent variable – Participants’ reaction times on a driving simulator after 1 or 3 drinks
e.g. reaction time (ms)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Test-retest reliability

A

This relates to consistency over time.

If we repeat the measurement at a later date do we get the same answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Inter-rater reliability

A

This relates to consistency across people. If someone else repeats the measurement (e.g., someone else rates my intelligence) will they produce the same answer?

20
Q

Parallel forms reliability

A

This relates to consistency across theoretically-equivalent measurements. If I use a different set of bathroom scales to measure my weight does it give the same answer?

21
Q

Internal consistency reliability

A

If a measurement is constructed from lots of different parts that perform similar functions (e.g., a personality questionnaire result is added up across several questions) do the individual parts tend to give similar answers.

22
Q

Reliability

A

A reliable measure is consistent
Measure your height today and then again tomorrow
Standardised tests are supposed to be reliable

23
Q

Validity

A

A valid measure is one that measures what it was intended to measure
A measuring tape should accurately measure height
A valid study is one that measures what it was intended to measure

24
Q

Internal validity

A

Refers to the extent to which you are able draw the correct conclusions about the causal relationships between variables.

25
External validity
relates to the generalisability or applicability of your findings.
26
Construct validity
Does your measurement measure what you think it should?
27
Ecological validity
can the conclusions be extrapolated to the real world?
28
Hypothesis testing
Process of drawing conclusions about whether a relationship between variables is supported or not supported by the evidence
29
Null hypothesis
No effect
30
Alternative hypothesis
Predict that there will be an effect
31
Two-tailed hypothesis
predict effects will be found but you don’t specify the direction e.g. Reaction times will differ between participants drinking one and three alcoholic drinks
32
One tailed hypothesis
predicts the direction Participants will respond quicker after drinking one alcoholic drink than after drinking three alcoholic drinks
33
Experiments
studies in which participants are randomly assigned to a condition or level of one or more independent variables able to make causal statements Control the confounding variables
34
Quasi experiments
we still have an experiment but we can’t randomly assign participants to the IV –e.g., handedness
35
Between-groups design
Different people complete the tasks, and comparisons are made between groups
36
Within groups design
The same participants do things more than once, and comparisons are made over time
37
Correlational studies
Correlational studies do not manipulate either variable Variables are assessed as they exist Cannot determine causality
38
Categorical analysis
Looking at the frequency of occurrence across one or two categorical variables Involves looking at the frequency at which participants ‘belong’ to particular categories In the analysis, you look at the observed frequency and see whether this differs from the frequency that you expect to see by random chance
39
Correlational analysis
Video game playing and aggression are related No evidence that playing video games causes aggression
40
Informed consent
researchers describe their research project and obtain participant’s consent to take part in the research based on their understanding of the project's methods and goals Whenever children or individuals with impairments are asked to participate, consent from them must be obtained wherever possible, as well as consent from the participant’s parent or guardian (dual consent) If a participant cannot provide consent or has an impairment in communication or understanding that prevents them being able to consent, then a written consent form signed by a parent or guardian who is in a position to understand the participant’s reaction must be obtained (dual-consent by proxy) In cases such as this, it is also advisable for the researcher to seek approval from a disinterested advisor who is familiar with ethical issues in research
41
Deception
deliberately misleading participants about any aspect of the research In some instances, it would be ok to deceive our participants, acknowledged by the BPS code of conduct This would be included in the ethics application where one would explain the deception and why its necessary Deception should be avoided, however in some studies this would be impossible to achieve since lots of psychological processes can be modified by individuals if they're aware they're being studied
42
Debriefing
explaining to participants the nature, results, and conclusions of the research they participated in and correcting any misconceptions Debriefing occurs after the completion of the study It is an opportunity for the researcher to deal with issues of withholding information, deception, and any potential harmful effects of participation The researcher should consider what the most appropriate form of debriefing is given the nature of the research being conducted
43
Internet research
Individuals conducting research on the internet should consider the potential implications of participation without having fully read the relevant information Yet another potential problem concerns the researcher’s inability to confirm the identity of online participants: E.g. if someone checks a box saying “I am over 18” because the research specifically requires that only over-18s can participate, then there is no way of verifying whether this person is actually over 18 A person can easily maintain anonymity by using a pseudonym that cannot be traced back to reveal their identity The exchange of information in open, public internet forums does not fall under the heading of research that requires informed consent and can be legitimately studied as long as there is no potential harm to participants When deception is used you have an obligation to debrief your participants, however, debriefing may be more difficult in internet research
44
Designing Ethical Research and Applying for Ethical Approval
Cost benefit approach – Does the potential of psychological distress or physical harm outweigh the benefits of the study? Study design – Making sure informed consent is collected, no deception if avoidable, no risk if avoidable, full debriefing Potential issues and safeguards included – Contact details in case any issues arise, outlining potential issues that could arise in the experiment but reassuring that the researchers are prepared to handle these issues in a safe and ethical way Role of ethics committee – They are an independent and objective committee who will look at the ethics application independently and objectively and assess whether or not it is feasible to go ahead Build time into research process – Make time to write consent forms, info sheets, debrief sheets etc., being available to wait for decision making from ethics committee
45
Research fraud
occurs when a researcher intentionally produces research which is inaccurate or untruthful
46
Ethics
a branch of philosophy concerned with the way in which we formulate codes and principles of moral behaviour
47
Morals v ethics
personally defined, are related to your own character – your moral values or principles – and generally don’t change much (although they sometimes do) Ethics are related to the system in which we live