week 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Hypothesis

A

is a specific, testable claim or prediction about what you expect observe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Research hypothesis

A

Statement you’re testing
What you expect to find
One-tailed: direction
Two-tailed: no direction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Null hypothesis

A

Provides a baseline against which to evaluate alternative hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Interpreting correlation

A

Correlation means that two variables vary together as one changes so does the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Extraneous variable

A

Anything other than the independent variable the could affect the dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Confounding variable

A

A type of extraneous variables that affects dependent variable
It is uncontrolled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Between subjects

A

Allocate people to different conditions and to only one of these conditions

Av: no carry over effects
Dv: greater expense, less statistical sensitivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Within subjects

A

each participant is tested in all conditions

Av: less expense, better statistical sensitivity
Dv: Carry over effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sample size

A

a lot to do with statistical power and effect size related to study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Effect size

A

Is a statistical measure of the magnitude of an observed effect in a population
Small effect size= larger sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Type 2 error. Statistical power

A

Failing to detect an effect that exists

Statistical power: is the probability of detecting a true effect when it actually exists in your population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Internal validity

A

We can be sure that the changes we observe have actually been caused by our manipulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Pre test

A

the observation or measure before the intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Experimental treatment

A

the different interventions or conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Post-test

A

the observation or measure after the intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Threats to internal validity

A

Confounding variables

In between subjects: Maturation effect: participants behaviour changes over time
History effect: something changes about the participants circumstance that influences the variables
Testing effect: merely having been testing before may have changed how they do on the post-test

Regression towards the mean: an extreme score is likely to become average

18
Q

Control group

A

Help minimise any influence maturation
don’t remove them

Types: passive- participants do nothing. Active- they do something. Wait list- participants are waiting to take part

19
Q

Eliminating confounding variables

A

Matched pairs design- participants are matched on a third variable and placed across the group
Random-participants design
Within-participants design

20
Q

Differential attrition

A

When people leave one condition or treatment more than any other

21
Q

Order effect

A

Practice effects-> participant perform a task better in later conditions
Fatigue effect-> participants perform a task worse in later conditions because they become tired or bored
Habituation -> participants may become less sensitive to stimulus through repetition

22
Q

Reduce order effect Counterbalancing

A

testing different participants in different orders
A then B
B then A
When lots of conditions use Latin-square design
Doesn’t remove order effect just balances them across the study

23
Q

Participants reactivity

A

Control groups awareness> active control
Evaluation apprehension> single blinding
Experimenter effect> double blinding

24
Q

Blinding

A

Single blinding: participants don’t know
Double blinding: neither participants or researchers know

25
Q

Stimuli

A

Should represent a good range of mor modalities
with manipulation check

Ceiling effects: the task is too easy or stimuli is extreme
Floor effects: task is too easy and stimuli is too weak

26
Q

External validity

A

linking experiment to real world increases generalisability