Week 2 Flashcards
What is the linear model of science?
Standard model
Evidence-based decision-making
more science leads to reduced uncertainty, which leads to political action
“Science as a disinterested force that can guide political decision making by providing appropriate facts - so long as it was kept separate from politics”
What is the political model of science?
Messy model
What does the role of science have to do with environmental conflict?
- assessing human-wildlife impacts
- suggesting and testing alternative mitigation techniques
- helping parties explore trade-offs.
What is the challenge in managing environmental conflict?
- unwillingness of parties to engage
- distrust
- striving for unrealistic goals
Based on the linear model of science, what are the sources of conservation conflicts?
- distrust
- when science is done to discover a specific outcome
What is the big take-away from this lecture?
That an obstacle to achieving shared understanding is not a lack of scientific knowledge, but (to the contrary) a huge body of knowledge that can be assembled and interpreted to yield competing views of a problem and how society should respond.
What is scientific bias?
when values and special interest are too closely connected to research
Three ways of doing impact assessment
what is the technocratic approach?
- the scientific approach (evidence-based decision-making)
- science and technique is dominated, politics are sidelined but still present.
- attempts to overcome politics through science by attempting to provide objective observations and guidelines
- the technocratic approach places too much emphasis on science
Three ways of doing impact assessment
what is the decisionistic approach?
- the political approach to decision making (decision-based evidence-making)
- political and economic interests are in a position to wield considerable influence
- places too much emphasis on politics
Three ways of doing impact assessment
what is the pragmatic approach?
- deliberative democracy (English coffee houses - 1650’s)
- debate and discussion aimed at producing reasonable, well-informed opinions
- instead of privileging science over values, it calls for openness and equality of information that is based on multiple sources and models of information