Week 18 - Making capital investment decisions Flashcards
What is the effect of taking a project on a firm’s cash flows?
Taking a project changes the firm’s overall cash flows both today and in the future.
What key question should a firm ask when evaluating a project’s impact on cash flows?
A firm should compare:
Cash flows without the project
Cash flows with the project
What is the direct consequence of taking a project?
The direct consequence is the change in net cash flows, which includes both additional revenues and new costs associated with the project.
What are incremental cash flows?
Incremental cash flows are the relevant cash flows that result from the direct consequences of taking a project.
What principle focuses only on incremental cash flows when evaluating a project?
The stand-alone principle — it focuses solely on the project’s resulting incremental cash flows.
What are relevant cash flows in project evaluation?
Relevant cash flows are any changes in the firm’s current and future cash flows that result directly from taking the project.
What type of cash flow is NOT relevant in project evaluation?
Any cash flow that exists regardless of whether or not the project is undertaken is not relevant.
What is the first step in evaluating a proposed project?
Obtain a set of pro-forma financial statements, which are projected or estimated financial statements.
What does “pro-forma” mean in financial analysis?
Pro-forma means projected, estimated, or predicted financial data.
How should a project be treated for evaluation purposes?
Treat the project as a mini-firm and forecast its financial statements to reflect future operations.
How can cash flow be derived from financial statements?
Compute cash flows using data from the project’s balance sheets and income statements.
What decision rules are commonly used to evaluate a proposed project?
The key evaluation methods include:
Net Present Value (NPV)
Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Payback Period
Average Accounting Return (AAR)
What key question should you ask when identifying relevant cash flows?
Ask: “Will this cash flow occur ONLY if we accept this project?”
What should you do if the answer to the key question (“Will this cash flow occur ONLY if we accept this project?”) is yes?
Include the cash flow in the analysis because it is incremental.
What should you do if the answer to the key question (“Will this cash flow occur ONLY if we accept this project?”) is no?
Exclude the cash flow, since it will occur regardless of the project.
What should you do if the answer to the key question (“Will this cash flow occur ONLY if we accept this project?”) is partly?
Include only the portion of the cash flow that occurs because of the project.
What are sunk costs and how should they be treated in cash flow analysis?
Sunk costs are past expenses that cannot be recovered. They should be excluded from project evaluation as they are not incremental
What are opportunity costs and how should they be treated in cash flow analysis?
Opportunity costs are the value of the best alternative foregone. They should be included in cash flow analysis because they are a real economic cost.
What are side effects in project evaluation?
Side effects are impacts on other areas of the firm, such as cannibalisation (when a new product reduces sales of an existing product). They should be included if they affect cash flows.
How do changes in net working capital affect cash flow analysis?
Increases in net working capital (e.g., inventory buildup) are a cash outflow, while decreases are a cash inflow. These changes should be included in project evaluation.
How should financing costs be treated in project evaluation?
Financing costs (e.g., interest expenses) should be excluded from project cash flow analysis as they are accounted for in the discount rate.
How should tax effects be treated in cash flow analysis?
Taxes must be included in project evaluation since they directly impact net cash flows. Consider tax shields from depreciation and other deductions.
Sunk costs example:
The General Milk Company is evaluating the NPV of a new project to make chocolate milk. As part of the evaluation, the company has paid a consulting firm £100,000 to perform a test-marketing analysis.
* The test marketing analysis shows that the present value of all the future cash flows from this project are £300,000. However, the initial investment is £250,000
* Should we take this project?
* is the £100,000 spent on consultants relevant for the capital budgeting decision?
The £100,000 spent on the consulting firm is a sunk cost and is not relevant for the capital budgeting decision.
Sunk costs are costs that have already been incurred and cannot be recovered. Since this money has already been spent regardless of whether the project goes ahead or not, it should not factor into the NPV calculation or decision-making.
The key consideration is whether the future cash flows exceed the initial investment.
NPV = Present value of future cash flows - initial investment
NPV = 300,000 - 250,000 = £50,000
Since the NPV is positive, the project is financially viable and should be accepted. The sunk cost of £100,000 is irrelevant to this calculation.
How should the £100,000 spent on test-marketing analysis be treated in project evaluation?
The £100,000 test-marketing cost is a sunk cost because it has already been incurred and cannot be recovered, regardless of whether the project is accepted or rejected. Therefore, it should be excluded from the project’s incremental cash flow analysis.