Week 13 - Freud, Mead, DuBois Flashcards
According to Freud, what causes individuals to become discontented?
- individual drives are fundamentally incompatible with society or ‘civilization
- however, the fact that individual drives and society must exist together creates such ‘discontented’ individuals
Define Id, Ego, and Superego, and the role of each.
- Id; self-interested innate primitive, instinctive and pleasure-seeking impulses of one’s personality
- our physical needs, ex. thirst, hunger - Ego; self-interested rationally-driven aspect of one’s personality
- operates according to the reality principle, working out realistic ways of satisfying the id’s demands, often compromising or postponing satisfaction to avoid negative consequences of society
- works to achieve a balance with our moral and idealistic standards (created by the superego)
- has no concept of right or wrong, something is good simply if it achieves its end of satisfying without causing harm to itself or to the id - Superego; aspect of one’s personality that control’s both the id’s impulses and the ego’s urges
- results from society’s morals and values
What are the 2 Conflicting Forces Within the Id? Why don’t they work together? Which part of the personality is responsible for mediating the two and how does it go this?
- Stability; drive to be social and create societies ex. families, nations
- Aggressiveness; hostility against individuals and civilizations
- aggression can’t be expressed within society, so it is internalized by the individual in the form of guilt
- superego has learned what society accepts, then guides individual, self-policing based on social rules, mediates aggression to make stability possible
- replaces external authority
Define/explain: cultural superego
- society wide, decides what is rights and wrong, then individuals’ superegos adopt these ideals
- this process enables us to set aside our individual self-interests and come together
What is the effect of he 2 Conflicting Forces Within the Id?
- a permanent internal unhappiness and sense of guilt
- neuroses; serious psychological problems that occur when one cannot deal with the tension, aka mental illness
Define: Mead’s concept of the ‘self’
- not initially there at birth
- only possible within society because it is hinged on your surrounding social structure and its symbolic systems, ex. language
- the things we learn in context impact the way we think
- distinguished from the body
- duality of mind and body; person knows that his or her body exists, but also that there is a socially-determined self that is somewhat separate from it
- result from social communication/interaction
How is the self both subject and object?
- subject; internal
- object; the self becomes an object when we externalize through communicating to ourselves
- we critique and view ourselves objectively, we hear and respond to ourselves
- the process of communicating with others teaches the individual how to communicate with him or herself
Define/explain Mead’s concept of multiple selves and the complete self. How are they connected?
- there are more than one socially determined selves that come out in different social contexts
- the way we communicate/interact differs in each context therefore we are a different self in each context
- we are made up of a complete self, which has many components
- the complete self is always there, certain selves stay on the margin/bench until needed
Define/explain: Mead’s concept of play
- play is ‘acting like’, child pretends to be someone
- their play is based on the things they have seen, and their interpretations of them
- thier understanding of how others do/should act
Define/explain: Mead’s concept of a game
- the player knows the rules, and wants to win
- their stage of development must allow them to understand and work within rules, and understand the motives of others
- the player understands the responses of the other and this, in turn, impacts his or her responses
- in a game the social context determines the individual’s response
- game provides an ‘other’; blend/synthesis of the attitudes of those involved in the same process, seen as one/a whole
Define/explain: Mead’s concept of the ‘generalized other’. What is its significance to the development of the self?
- an amalgamation of the individual attitudes of others
- the attitudes, values, ideals of a whole community, based on a majority
- understanding of the generalized other is necessary for the full development of the self
- once we understand the generalized other we then change our actions based on the attitudes of the generalized other, to fit in
- makes common meaning possible
Differentiate between the I and Me.
‘I’; an individual’s response to the Me, which allows for personality and individual variance
‘Me’; the internalized and organized set of attitudes of others (the generalized other) that an individual assumes
-the ‘Me’ understand and internalizes rules, the ‘I’ then performs an action and uses agency to individualize where it can
Define/explain: The Veil (Du Bois)
- exists for POC, in a racialized society
- similar to the feminist ‘glass ceiling’
- shuts POC out from the same opportunities as the Whites
- only lets him see himself through the eye of a generalized other that looks on in amused contempt and pity, they impose negative stereotypes on you
- stops the process of true self-actualization
- leads to double-consciousness; dealing with conflicting understandings of him or herself in relation to structural racism, ex. both an American and a Negro
Describe Du Bois’ process of negotiating the double self.
- in order to negotiate the double self, an individual must acknowledge that each self has something to offer
- they need to find their authentic self with a mix of both the ‘American’ and ‘Negro’ selves
- the idea is not to assimilate to social/structured racism
- the goal is to recognize that you have something valuable to contribute
How do the tensions resulting from the double consciousness affect Blacks?
- Black are constantly negotiating imposed double-aims: to escape white contempt and also to simultaneously fight for “his people”
- half-named Negro problem; when we see the struggle from an outsiders perspective it looks like weakness, all we see are the social problems related to that group and it’s easy to blame the race, ex. high rate of incarceration
- rather, they are strong for bearing the strain of racism and oppression