Week 12 & 13: Promulgation of Judgment & Post Judgment Remedies Flashcards
Rule 120. Sec. 1. Judgment; definition and form. – Judgment is the […] and the […]. It must be […], personally and directly prepared by […] and shall contain […].
Rule 120. Sec. 1. Judgment; definition and form. – Judgment is the adjudication by the court that the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offense charged and the imposition on him of the proper penalty and civil liability, if any. It must be written in the official language, personally and directly prepared by the judge and signed by him and shall contain clearly and distinctly a statement of the facts and the law upon which it is based.
May the judge defer the writing of the decision on the ground of lack of stenographic notes?
No. Under Par. III. 15. of AM No. 15-06-10 Continuous Trial Rules, “Judges who conducted the trial and heard the testimonies of some or all of the witnesses shall not defer the submission of the case for decision on the ground of incomplete or missing transcript of stenographic notes.”
What shall be the duty of the judge who is tasked to write the decision but was not the judge who conducted the trial and had not heard the testimonies of the witnesses?
The judge who is tasked to write the decision but did not conduct the hearing and had not heard the testimonies of the witnesses shall direct the stenographers concerned to submit the complete transcript within a period of thirty (30) calendar days from the date of his/her assumption to office. [Continuous Trial Rules].
Rule 120. Sec. 2. par. 2. In case the judgment is of acquittal, it shall state whether the […] or merely […]. In either case, the judgment shall determine if […].
Rule 120. Sec. 2. par. 2. In case the judgment is of acquittal, it shall state whether the evidence of the prosecution absolutely failed to prove the guilt of the accused or merely failed prove his guilty beyond reasonable doubt. In either case, the judgment shall determine if the act or omission from which the civil liability might arise did not exist.
CONST. Art. III. Sec 21. No person shall be […]. If an act is punished by a law and an ordinance, […].
CONST. Art. III. Sec 21. No person shall be twice put in jeopardy of punishment for the same offense. If an act is punished by a law and an ordinance, conviction or acquittal under either shall constitute a bar to another prosecution for the same act.
Rule 117. Sec. 3(i). Grounds. – The accused may move to quash the complaint or information on any of the following grounds: [xxx xxx]
(i) That the accused has been […], or otherwise […].
Rule 117. Sec. 3(i). Grounds. – The accused may move to quash the complaint or information on any of the following grounds: [xxx xxx]
(i) That the accused has been previously convicted or acquitted of the offense charged, or otherwise terminated without his express consent.
Rule 117. Sec. 7. par. 1. Former conviction or acquittal; double jeopardy. – When an accused has been convicted or acquitted, or the case against him dismissed or otherwise terminated without his express consent by a court […], upon a […] sufficient in form and substance to sustain a conviction and after the […], the conviction or acquittal of the accused or the dismissal of the case shall be a bar to another prosecution for the offense charged, or for any attempt to commit the same or frustration thereof, or for any offense which […].
Rule 117. Sec. 7. par. 1. Former conviction or acquittal; double jeopardy. – When an accused has been convicted or acquitted, or the case against him dismissed or otherwise terminated without his express consent by a court of competent jurisdiction, upon a valid complaint or information or other formal charge sufficient in form and substance to sustain a conviction and after the accused had pleaded to the charge, the conviction or acquittal of the accused or the dismissal of the case shall be a bar to another prosecution for the offense charged, or for any attempt to commit the same or frustration thereof, or for any offense which necessarily includes or is necessarily included in the offense charged in the former complaint or information.
Rule 117. Sec. 7. par. 2. Former conviction or acquittal; double jeopardy. – However, the conviction of the accused shall not be a bar to another prosecution for an offense which necessarily includes the offense charged in the former complaint or information under any of the following instances:
(a) the […] arising from the same act or omission constituting the former charge;
(b) the […] was entered in the former complaint or information; or
(c) the plea of guilty to the lesser offense was […] except as provided in […].
In any of the foregoing cases, where the accused satisfies or serves in whole or in part the judgment, he shall be credited with the same in the event of conviction for the graver offense.
Rule 117. Sec. 7. par. 2. Former conviction or acquittal; double jeopardy. – However, the conviction of the accused shall not be a bar to another prosecution for an offense which necessarily includes the offense charged in the former complaint or information under any of the following instances:
(a) the graver offense developed due to supervening facts arising from the same act or omission constituting the former charge;
(b) the facts constituting the graver charge became known or were discovered only after a plea was entered in the former complaint or information; or
(c) the plea of guilty to the lesser offense was made without the consent of the prosecutor and of the offended party except as provided in Section 1(f) of Rule 116.
In any of the foregoing cases, where the accused satisfies or serves in whole or in part the judgment, he shall be credited with the same in the event of conviction for the graver offense.
Rule 65. Sec. 1. Petition for certiorari. – When any […] has acted […], or with […], and there is […] in the ordinary course of law, a person aggrieved thereby may file a verified petition in the proper court, alleging the facts with certainty and praying that judgment be rendered […], and granting such incidental reliefs as law and justice may require.
The petition shall be accompanied by a certified true copy of the judgment, order or resolution subject thereof, copies of all pleadings and documents relevant and pertinent thereto, and a sworn certification of non-forum shopping as provided in the third paragraph of Section 3, Rule 46.
Rule 65. Sec. 1. Petition for certiorari. – When any tribunal, board or officer exercising judicial or quasi-judicial functions has acted without or in excess of its or his jurisdiction, or with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction, and there is no appeal, nor any plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, a person aggrieved thereby may file a verified petition in the proper court, alleging the facts with certainty and praying that judgment be rendered annulling or modifying the proceedings of such tribunal, board or officer, and granting such incidental reliefs as law and justice may require.
The petition shall be accompanied by a certified true copy of the judgment, order or resolution subject thereof, copies of all pleadings and documents relevant and pertinent thereto, and a sworn certification of non-forum shopping as provided in the third paragraph of Section 3, Rule 46.
Rule 120. Sec. 2. par. 1. Contents of the judgment. – If the judgment is of conviction, it shall state (1) the […] constituted by the acts committed by the accused and the aggravating or mitigating circumstances which attended its commission; (2) the […] in the offense, whether as […], or […]; (3) the […] upon the accused; and (4) the […] caused by his wrongful act or omission to be recovered from the accused by the offended party, if there is any, unless the […].
Rule 120. Sec. 2. par. 1. Contents of the judgment. – If the judgment is of conviction, it shall state (1) the legal qualification of the offense constituted by the acts committed by the accused and the aggravating or mitigating circumstances which attended its commission; (2) the participation of the accused in the offense, whether as principal, accomplice, or accessory; (3) the penalty imposed upon the accused; and (4) the civil liability or damages caused by his wrongful act or omission to be recovered from the accused by the offended party, if there is any, unless the enforcement of the civil liability by a separate civil action has been reserved or waived.
When may the court grant a new trial or reconsideration?
The court may grant a new trial or reconsideration at any time before a judgment of conviction becomes final, and on motion of the accused or at its own instance but with the consent of the accused. [Rule 121. Sec. 1]
What are the grounds for a new trial?
The court shall grant a new trial on nay of the following grounds:
(a) That errors of law or irregularities prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused have been committed during trial;
(b) That new and material evidence has been discovered which the accused could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial and which if introduced and admitted would probably change the judgment. [Rule 121. Sec. 2]
What are the grounds for reconsideration?
The court shall grant reconsideration on the ground of errors of law or fact in the judgment, which requires no further proceedings. [Rule 121. Sec. 3]
What shall be the form of motion for new trial or reconsideration?
The motion for new trial or reconsideration shall be in writing and shall state the grounds on which it is based.
If based on a newly-discovered evidence, the motion must be supported by affidavits of witnesses by whom such evidence is expected to be given or by duly authenticated copies of documents which are proposed to be introduced in evidence.
Notice of the motion for new trial or reconsideration shall be given to the prosecutor. [Rule 121. Sec. 4]
What is the effect of granting a new trial on the ground of errors of law or irregularities committed during the trial?
When a new trial is granted on the ground of errors of law or irregularities committed during the trial, all the proceedings and evidence affected thereby shall be set aside and taken anew. The court may, i the interest of justice, allow the introduction of additional evidence. [Rule 121. Sec. 6(a)].
What is the effect of granting a new trial on the ground of newly-discovered evidence?
When a new trial is granted on the ground of newly-discovered evidence, the evidence already adduced shall stand and the newly-discovered and such other evidence as the court may, in the interest of justice, allow to be introduced shall be taken and considered together with the evidence already in the record. [Rule 121. Sec. 6(b)].
What is the in all cases when the court grants new trial or reconsideration?
In all cases, when the court grants new trial or reconsideration, the original judgment shall be set aside or vacated and a new judgment rendered accordingly. [Rule 121. Sec. 6(c)].
Who may appeal judgment?
Any party may appeal from a judgment or final order, unless the accused will be placed in double jeopardy. [Rule 122. Sec. 1].
When may appeal not be allowed?
Appeal is not allowed when the accused will be placed in double jeopardy. [Rule 122. Sec. 1].
Where do you appeal in cases decided by the Metropolitan Trial Court, Municipal Trial Court in Cities, Municipal Trial Court, or Municipal Circuit Trial Court?
Regional Trial Court. [Rule 122. Sec. 2(a)].
Appeals from decisions in these courts may be elevated to the Regional Trial Court.
Metropolitan Trial Court, Municipal Trial Court in Cities, Municipal Trial Court, or Municipal Circuit Trial Court. [Rule 122. Sec. 2(a)].