Week 11 - Altruism and Prosocial Behaviour Flashcards

1
Q

Who was Kitty Genovese?

A

1960s New York
- Was stabbed, raped, and murdered
- Allegedly witnesses by over 30 people - but NO ONE HELPED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Compare the definition of altruism vs prosocial behaviour?

A

Altruism - any act of voluntary self-sacrifice intended to benefit another person with NO EXPECTATION OF REWARD

Prosocial Behaviour - any act performed by an individual with the goal of benefiting another person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why are we helpful: Evolutionary Perspective

A

Natural selection is a poor fit for altruism (risky behaviour = dangerous?)

Contemporary evolution suggests that altruistic behaviours contribute to INCLUSIVE FITNESS
–> The GENE is the unit of selection, not the individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Study: Burnstein et al (1994) - Kinship and Helping

A

Degree of relatedness, health, and situation all matter
-> overall: participants more likely to help someone who is CLOSER IN RELATION
-> in a life or death situation - helping someone who is in good health
-> under normal situation - helping someone who is sick

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Study: Korchmaros & Kenny - Emotional Connection

A

Emotional closeness predicted willingness to help MORE STRONGLY than genetic closeness

Genetic closeness plays a ROLE but is STRENGTHENED BY EMOTIONAL BONDS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Study: Wu et al (2016) - Cultural Differences

A

Taiwan: in everyday and life-or-death scenarios - participants prioritise their mother

US: in both situations - participants prioritise saving their spouse

CULTURAL DISSIMILARITY: strong cultural component that cannot be explained by evolution (social roles)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the limits to an evolutionary perspective?

A

Demonstrating causal relationships is difficult, if not impossible

There are reasons beyond genetics that we choose to help - emotional attachment

How would we explain instances of helping complete strangers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Alternative Theories: What is social exchange theory?

A

Builds on behaviourist notions –> behaviour motivated by the desire to maximise rewards and minimise costs

Rewards can be:
Tangible (eg. money)
Intangible (eg. social approval)
Removal of aversive states (eg. distress)

Negative State Relief Hypothesis: Seeing people in need causes us to feel distressed, so we try and help them (to enhance our mood)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the Empathy-Altruism Model?

A

“Whether people help depends on how they respond emotionally to the victim’s plight”

Empathy is the critical factor - it decides the action:
1. If you DO feel empathy: help is given regardless of self-interest
2. If you DO NOT feel empathy: help is given if it is in your interest to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Toi & Batson - Testing the empathy altruism model (1982)

A

Found that in a low empathy situation (maintaining emotional distance) - more % willing to help in the high cost situation (student will be in their class vs working from home)

Found that in high empathy situation (putting yourself in their shoes) regardless of cost helping was similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Batson et al. (1991) - Empathetic Joy

A

Empathetic Joy - a warm glow
- Are people’s actions guided by the egoistic motivation to experience empathetic joy

Batson - told they would or would not hear back from the person they helped

FOUND:
- Work shows that the experience of empathy for another person over-rides cost-benefit analysis
–> altruistic helping is independent from any rewards including emotional ones (‘glow’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Study: Latane & Darley (1970) - The Bystander Effect, Situational Factors that influence helping behaviour?

A

Students sit in a room to complete a series of questionnaires and smoke begins to fill the room:
–> 75% called out when alone
–> 38% called out when with strangers
–> 10% called out when with strangers who ignored the smoke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Study: Garcia et al. (2002) - The Bystander Effect (thinking about others)

A

Even THINKING about other people can elicit the BYSTANDER EFFECT
- thinking about a large group - willing to donate a much smaller proportion of their income

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Study: Levine (2010) - Repetition of Levine with varied audience

A

Female undergraduates - thinking about other women provokes thinking about gender identity group membership…and the stereotypes about communality that come with it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is attribution theory (responsibility and control)

A

Who is ‘deserving’ of our help?
- Responsibility: is the person responsible for their situation?
- Control: do they have control over their predicament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Study: Schmidt & Weiner (1988) - Victim Responsibility

A

Perceptions of personal control and responsibility were:
- Positively correlated with anger
- Negatively correlated with empathy and intentions to help

17
Q

Study: Levine et al. (2005) - Victim Identity

A

Manchester United Fans run into victim in a manu/liverpool/neutral shirt

Helping highest for manchester united fan, then neutral, then liverpool

^ Individual membership “I am a manchester united fan” way of thinking

THEN

Asked to think about why they were a football fan?

Manchester U and Liverpool shirt victim helping was similar

^ Group membership “We are both football fans”