Week 11 Flashcards
Early childhood dev problems
Sleeping problems, toileting problems, ASD, learning
disorders
Starting kinder, school
Middle childhood dev problems
CD, ADHD, anxiety, somatic complaints
School success, peer relationships
Adolescence dev problems
Depression, eating disorders, OCD, schizophrenia
Transition to secondary school, peers, body image
Early adulthood
Depression, anxiety, substance use, personality disorders
Tertiary study, employment, intimate relationships,
parenting
Middle adulthood
Depression, anxiety, post-natal depression
Parenting, financial stressors, separation/divorce, care of
own parents, loss of parents
Older adults
Depression, dementia
Retirement, health declines, loss of partner
Conceptualising and validating child interventions
Historically:
One treatment fits all approach – “uniformity myth”
Practitioner (rigid) adherence to one theoretical viewpoint
Conceptualising and validating child interventions
More recently
Recognition of therapist effects
Recognition of comorbidity
Empirically supported treatments
Evidence-Based Practice
Important to consider equifinality
Challenges of efficacy studies:
Parent willingness to allow child to be part of trial
( many don’t want their kids in there. Might for payment or free child therapy)
Exclusion criteria in RCTs limits participants to those without comorbidities
Treatment fidelity in trials not necessarily carried over to
practise
- we tightly control what we do in an RCT, real therapy often less controled.
Research samples often do not have as severe symptomatology as clinical samples
Problems with dissemination to “real world” clinics
Evaluation of interventions for
children and adolescents
(Weis, 2014)
Despite challenges
Evaluations of efficacy: meta-analyses consistently show
moderate to large effect sizes
Efficacy of therapy for children similar to efficacy of therapy for adults
As with adult therapy outcomes, can not conclude that one type of therapy is best overall.
Conclusions from meta-analyses of efficacy studies:
Behavioural therapies tend to yield greater effect sizes
- behaviourists are more likely to apply beh therapies to problems with a beh underpinning
- beh ther lends itself well to rigorous RCTs
Treatments tend to work better for adolescents compared to children
Treatment equally efficacious for internalising and externalising disorders
Children show global and specific improvements
- If you target a specific behavioural issue or symptom within treatment, they tend to show improvements in that but also in other areas.
Effectiveness studies
Effect sizes much lower than efficacy studies.
Most therapy not delivered under same conditions as
efficacy studies
High therapist workloads
Lack of training in empirically supported interventions
Complexity and diversity in most clinics
Knowledge of normal development is essential
To distinguish normal from pathological behaviour
Understanding of developmental context, e.g., current
psychosocial tasks
Cognitive and emotional development is taken into account
dev transitions vs transactional processes
Consideration of developmental transitions
e. g., to primary school
- kids are in a context, interacting with other people. The other people are influenced by others. All complex and connected.
Consideration of transactional processes
Suggests importance of others, e.g., parents, peers
Developmental Psychopathology Approach:
Implications for intervention
Link intervention planning to understanding of pathogenic
processes
(Shirk et al., 2011, cited in Kerig, et al., 2012)
Case formulation: Clinician’s theoretical formulation of the
developmental issues underlying the child’s problem
Match the formulation of the pathological process to the most relevant change process
Case Formulation – “5Ps”
Presenting problem
Predisposing factors - historical, biological factors
Precipitating factors - why me, now? current triggers
Perpetuating factors - things that maintain the problem
Protective factors - things that help protect against risk
Interventions with Children:
Cross-cultural Considerations
(Kerig, et al., 2012
Cultural differences in pathology
e.g., due to hostility and prejudice associated with racism
Cultural differences in treatment
e.g., involvement of families, involvement of therapist from own cultural group
Cultural differences in knowledge (clinician being culturally competent)
Culturally responsive treatments - Modified to create a better fit with the individual
Common factors in therapy
Unconditional positive regard: acceptance
Congruence: genuineness
Empathy: attempt to understand the world from the client’s perspective