Week 1 - Quality and Safety Flashcards
Define an adverse event.
An injury that is caused by medical management (rather than the underlying disease) that prolongs hospitalisation, produces a disability or both
Define an adverse preventable event.
An adverse event that could be prevented given the current state of medical knowledge
What is clinical governance?
A framework through which NHS organisations are accountable for continuously improving the quality of their services and safeguarding high standards of care by creating an environment in which excellence in clinical care will flourish
State the quality improvement mechanisms employed by the NHS.
- Standard setting
- Commissioning
- Financial incentives
- Disclosure
- Regulation, registration and inspection
- Clinical audit and quality improvement - local and national
What is a NICE Quality Standard?
A set of statements that are;
- Markers of high quality, clinical and cost-effective patient care across a pathway or clinical area
- Derived from the best available evidence such as NICE Guidance or other NHS accredited sources
- Produced collaboratively with the NHS and social care, along with their partners and service users
What is a clinical audit?
A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through a systematic review of care against criteria and implementation of change
Outline the practical criticisms of evidence-based practice.
- May be an impossible task to create and maintain systematic reviews across all specialties
- May be challenging and expensive to disseminate and implement findings
- RCTs are seen as the gold standard but not always feasible or even necessary/desirable, e.g. due to ethical considerations
- Choice of outcomes often very biomedical and therefore may limit which interventions are trialed and therefore which are funded (e.g. NICE Guidance)
- Requires good faith on the part of pharmaceutical companies (i.e. trusting that all relevant evidence is in the public domain)
Outline the philosophical criticisms of evidence based practice.
- Does not align with most doctors’ modes of reasoning, i.e. deterministic vs probabilistic causality
- Aggregate population-level outcomes does not mean that an intervention will work for an individual
- Potential of EBM (or its implementation e.g. through NICE or clinical governance) to create unreflective rule followers out of professionals
- Might be understood as a way of legitimising rationing, with potential to undermine trust in the doctor-patient relationship and ultimately the NHS
- Professional responsibility/autonomy
Give the criteria a screening test should fulfill before a screening test can be considered.
- Should be simple and safe, screening healthy people
- Precise and valid (i.e. it should tell the truth)
- Acceptable to the population
- Distribution of test values in the population must be known
- An agreed cut-off level must be defined and agreed
- Must be an agreed policy on who to investigate further
- If the test is for a particular mutation or set of genetic variants, the method for their selection and the means through which they must be kept under review in the programme should be clearly set out
Define lead time bias.
When a screening programme leads to earlier diagnosis but not improved survival
Define length time bias.
When a screening programme diagnoses a larger proportion of slower growing tumours than fast growing tumours leading to the false impression of improved survival
What are latent conditions?
Contexts within which active failures occur: e.g. organisational processes, understaffing, poor communication
State two generic health-related quality of life instruments.
- SF-36
2. EQ 5D
State the disadvantages of generic health-related quality of life instruments.
- Loss of detail
- Loss of relevance
- May be insensitive to changes that occur as a result of intervention
- May be less acceptable to patients
State the reasons why evaluating any health promotion intervention can be difficult.
- Design of the intervention
- Possible time lag to effect - delay
- Initial effects might wear off - decay
- Many potential intervening or concurrent confounding factors
- High cost of evaluation research