Webcasts Flashcards

1
Q

Will a defence be a complete defence?

A

There may be a full or partial defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the types of defences?

A
  • contributory negligence
  • volenti non fit injuria (consent)
  • illegality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the principle of contributory negligence?

A

Where a C fault contributed to their damage, they can be reduced in proportion to the C fault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Is contributory negligence a complete defence?

A

Partial (s1 law reform (contributory negligence) act 1945).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the elements of contributory negligence?

A
  • fault
  • causative potency
  • reduction in damages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the definition of fault?

A

S4 law reform (contributory negligence) act 1945 says it means negligence, breach of statutory duty or per act or omission, which gives rise to a liability in tort or rise to the defence of contributory negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is negligence needed for a C to be found liable for contributory negligence?

A

No (Nance) all that is needed is that e injured party did not take reasonable care of himself and contributed to his own injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Does a duty of care need to be established for whether contributory negligence is present?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In Froome v Butcher what does Denning say the difference is between negligence and contributory negligence is?

A

Negligence depends on a breach of duty, contributory negligence does not. Negligence is a mans carelessness in looking after his own safety. Guilty of contributory negligence if he ought reasonably to have foreseen that if he did not act as a reasonable prudent man he might hurt himself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Give some examples of situations where contributory negligence occurs?

A
  • seatbelts
  • intoxication
  • children
  • emergency action
  • rescuers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If you are intoxicated can you be contributory negligent in accepting a lift from a drunk driver?

A

Yes (Owen - 20% contributory negligent).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Can a child be contributory negligent?

A

Goth - young child cannot but an older child may, it depends on the circumstances. Only if he is of such an age that he is reasonably expected to take precautions for his own safety and then only if blame should be attached to him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can a rescuer be contributory negligent?

A

Only if their acts are so foolhardy to amount as unreasonable disregard for his own safety. Could break the chain (Tolley).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who has to establish that the C has been contributory negligent?

A

D.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In relation to seatbelts what does the D have to prove?

A

That not wearing a seatbelt added to the C harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Denning say the question was that needs to be asked with regards to wearing seatbelts and damage caused in the case of Froome?

A

The question is not what was the cause of the accident but rather what was the cause of the damage. The negligent driver must bear the greater share of responsibility.

17
Q

Who is the burden of proof on?

A

D and the standard of proof is the balance of probabilities.