we the people ch 4 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

— — defined as individual rights and personal freedoms with which governments are constrained from interfering; that is, they are protections FOR Americans FROM the government

A

Civil Liberties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

— — protections of citizen equality provided BY the government

A

Civil Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Article 1, Section 9, included the right of — —, court order demanding that an individual in custody be brought into court and shown the cause for detention; this prohibits the government from depriving a person of liberty without explaining the reason before a judge

A

Habeas Corpus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

As Jefferson put it: a – - – “is what people are entitled to against every government on earth”

A

Bill of Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Civil liberties are protections of — from improper government action.

A

Citizens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

— — - — is the right of every citizen to be protected against arbitrary action by national or state governments

A

Due process of law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

— — did not become part of the constitution until 1868, with the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, which sought to provide for each citizen “the equal protection of the laws”

A

Civil Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Civil rights as a category refers to the obligation imposed on government to – – – to protect citizens from any illegal actions by government agencies and by other private citizens

A

Take positive action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In the first 70 years of the country’s history, the bill of rights was understood to apply only to the – — and not to the —. in fact, the supreme court said this in the decision of — v — in 1833

A

National government
State
Barron v Baltimore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

After the war, the 14th amendment was added to the constitution, partially reading as though it were meant to tell — that they must adhere to the – - –

A

States

Bill of Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In — the court added Freedom of the press to the first amendment

A

1931

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In — the court added freedom of assembly and petitioning the government for redress of grievances

A

1939

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

*As late as 1937, the supreme court was still unwilling to nationalize civil liberties beyond the 1st amendment. The constitution, as interpreted by the supreme court in Palko v Connecticut, left standing the framework in which the states had the power to determine their own law on a number of fundamental issues

A

None

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

— — is the process by which different protections in the Bill of Rights were incorporated or applied to the states using the 14th amendment, thus guaranteeing citizens’ protection from the state as well as national government - continues to occur gradually, up until the last incorporation case in 2010. (— is also sometimes referred to “absorption” or the “nationalizing” of the Bill Of Rights.

A

Selective Incorporation

Incorporation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
The Bill of Rights begins by guaranteeing freedom, and the 1st amendment provides for that freedom in two distinct clauses; 
# 1 is called the --- ---: "congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion
A

Establishment clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
The Bill of Rights begins by guaranteeing freedom, and the 1st amendment provides for that freedom in two distinct clauses; 
#2 is called the --- --- ---: "congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion"
A

Free exercise clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The — — and the idea of “no law” regarding the establishment of religion can be interpreted in several ways.

1) the government is prohibited from establishing n official church
2) the “nonpreferentialist” or “accomodationalist” view that government may not take sides among competing religions but may provide assistance to religious institutions or ideas as long as it shows no favoritism
3) “wall of separation” between church and state

A

Establishment clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

*In Van Orden v Perry the court decided by a 5-4 margin that a display of the ten commandments t the Texas state capitol did not violate the constitution

A

None

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

*In contrast to Van Orden v Perry, in the case of McCreary v ACLU of Kentucky the court determined, at the same time and also by a 5-4 margin, that a display of the ten commandments inside two Kentucky courthouses was unconstitutional

A

None

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The – – – protects the citizen’s right to believe and to practice whatever religion he chooses; it also protects the right to be a nonbeliever.

A

Free exercise clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

*West Virginia State Board of Education v Barnette (1943) involved the children of a family of Jehovah’s witnesses who refused to salute and pledge allegiance to the American flag on the grounds that their religious faith did not permit it. Three years earlier, the court had upheld such a requirement and had permitted schools to expel students for refusing to salute the flag. But the entry of the US into war to defend democracy, coupled with the ugly treatment to which Jehovah’s witnesses children had been subjected, induced the court to reverse itself and to endorse the free exercise of religion even when it may be offensive to the beliefs of the majority.

A

None

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

*Hosanna -Tabor Church v Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2012) court ruled unanimously that employment discrimination laws did not apply to the hiring and firing of church leaders, including those who teach at religious educational institutions. This new “ministerial exception” created by the court left open the question of deciding who was and was not included in this exception.

A

None

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

– – government policies or programs that seek to address past injustices against specified groups by making special efforts to provide member of these groups with access to educational and employment opportunities

A

Affirmative action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

– – – the first 10 amendments to the US constitution, ratified in 1791, they ensure certain rights and liberties to the people

A

Bill of rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

– – – laws that declare a person guilty of a crime without a trial

A

Bills of attainder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

– v – – – the 1954 supreme court decision that struck down the “separate but equal” doctrine as fundamentally unequal. This case eliminated state power to use race as a criterion for discrimination in law and provided the national government with the power to intervene by exercising strict regulatory policies against discriminatory actions

A

Brown v board of education

27
Q

– – areas of personal freedom with which governments are constrained from interfering

A

Civil liberties

28
Q

– – obligation imposed on government to take positive action to protect citizens from any illegal action of government agencies and of other private citizens

A

Civil rights

29
Q

– – – – – test to determine whether speech is protected or unprotected, based on its capacity to present a “clear and present danger” to society

A

Clear and present danger test

30
Q

– – literally, “by fact” ; practices that occur even when there is no legal enforcement such as school segregation in much of the US today.

A

De Facto

31
Q

– – literally, “by law”; legally enforced practices such as school segregation in the south before the 1960s

A

De Jure

32
Q

– – the 5th amendment right providing that a person cannot be tried twice for the same crime

A

Double jeopardy

33
Q

– – – – the right of every citizen against arbitrary action by national or state governments

A

Due process of law

34
Q

– – the right of government to take private property for public use

A

Eminent domain

35
Q

– – – provision of the 14th amendment guaranteeing citizens “the equal protection of the laws” this clause has served as the basis for the civil rights of African Americans, women and other groups

A

Equal protection clause

36
Q

– – the first amendment clause that says that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” this law means that a “wall of separation” exists between church and state

A

Establishment clause

37
Q

– – the ability of courts to exclude evidence obtained in violation of the 4th amendment

A

Exclusionary rule

38
Q

– – – – laws that declare an action to be illegal after it has been committed

A

Ex Post Facto Laws

39
Q

– – one of three civil war amendments; guaranteed voting rights for Africana American men.

A

15th amendment

40
Q

– – speech that directly incites damaging conduct

A

Fighting words

41
Q

– – one of three civil war amendments; guaranteed equal protection and due process

A

14th amendment

42
Q

– – – the firth amendment clause that protects a citizens right to believe and practice whatever religion he or she chooses

A

Free exercise clause

43
Q

– – the jury that determines whether sufficient evidence is available to justify a trial; this does not rule on the accused’s guilt or innocence

A

Grand jury

44
Q

– – a court order demanding that an individual in custody be brought into court and shown the cause for detention

A

Habeas Corpus

45
Q

– a written statement made in “reckless disregard of the truth” that is considered damaging to a victim because it is “malicious, scandalous, and defamatory”

A

Libel

46
Q

– – the requirement, articulated by the supreme court in Miranda v Arizona (1966), that persons under arrest must be informed prior to police interrogation of their rights to remain silent and to have the benefit of legal counsel

A

Miranda rule

47
Q

– – an effort by a governmental agency to block the publication of material it deems libelous or harmful in some other way; censorship. In the US, the courts forbid this except under the most extraordinary circumstances

A

Prior restraint

48
Q

– – – the right to be left alone which has been interpreted by the supreme court to entail individual access to birth control and abortions

A

right to privacy

49
Q

– – the process by which different protections in the bill of rights were incorporated into the 14th amendment thus guaranteeing citizen’s protection from state as well as national government

A

Selective incorporation

50
Q

– – – – doctrine that public accommodations could be segregated by race but still be considered equal

A

separate but equal rule

51
Q

– an oral statement made in reckless disregard of the truth which is considered damaging to the victim because it is “malicious, scandalous, and defamatory”

A

Slander

52
Q

– – speech accompanied by conduct such as sit-ins, picketing, and demonstrations. Protections of this form of speech under the first amendment is conditional and restrictions imposed by state or local authorities are acceptable if properly balanced by considerations of public order.

A

Speech plus

53
Q

– – test, used by the supreme court in racial discrimination cases and other cases involving civil liberties and civil rights that places the burden or proof on the government rather than on the challengers to show that the law in question is constitutional

A

Strict scrutiny

54
Q

– – one of three civil war amendments; abolished slavery

A

13th amendment

55
Q

This law was not included in the original constitution

— — —- — — —

A

Prohibition of warrantless search and seizure

56
Q

— Amendment
This provided that all of the protections contained in the bill of rights applied to the states as well as the national government

A

The 14th amendment

57
Q

the process by which some of the liberties in the bill of rights were applied to the states or nationalized is known as

A

Selective incorporation

58
Q

The judicial doctrine that places a heavy burden of proof on the government when it seeks to regulate or restrict speech

A

Strict scrutiny

59
Q

In McDonald v Chicago the supreme court ruled that The — —applied to states as well as the federal government.

A

Second amendment

60
Q

The 4th, 5th, 6th, and 8th amendments taken together define

— — – —

A

define due process of law

61
Q

Supreme court ruled that state governments no longer had the authority to make private sexual behavior a crime in the case of — v. —, this ruling meant that gay men and lesbians could claim rights to privacy.

A

Lawrence v Texas

62
Q

When did civil rights become part of the constitution?

Year? Amendment?

A

1868, the 14th amendment

63
Q

This was not a way the 24th amendment of 1964 and the voting rights act of 1965 significantly extended and protected voting rights

A

By requiring all voters to register two weeks before any federal election

64
Q

The supreme courts decision in Bakke v Board of Regents was significant because It stated that — is a compelling state interest and that university admissions that take racial categorized into account are constitutional as long as they are highly —.

A

diversity

individualized